The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user,
read this for detailed instructions.
I believe the users are one and the same due to the new IP adding "a douche nozzle" to the Andy Borowitz page, which the old IP also did frequently
Comments
Conclusions
Practically, it might be justified to extend the 31-hour block on the ...212.33 IP because the ...117.27 IP evaded the block, vandalizing within an hour after the original IP was blocked. However, since he stopped after one edit, I think the simplest thing is to ignore the problem and let the block run its course (which it already has).
ShalomHello02:15, 6 August 2007 (UTC)reply
The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user,
read this for detailed instructions.
I believe the users are one and the same due to the new IP adding "a douche nozzle" to the Andy Borowitz page, which the old IP also did frequently
Comments
Conclusions
Practically, it might be justified to extend the 31-hour block on the ...212.33 IP because the ...117.27 IP evaded the block, vandalizing within an hour after the original IP was blocked. However, since he stopped after one edit, I think the simplest thing is to ignore the problem and let the block run its course (which it already has).
ShalomHello02:15, 6 August 2007 (UTC)reply