Mayalld ( talk) 10:23, 30 October 2008 (UTC) reply
45Factoid44 has previously disclosed that he formerly edited from 96.5.66.240, but when that IP began editing and showing ownership in a MEDCAB case raised by 45Factoid44, it was denied that the two were the same person, or that they even knew each other. I closed the MEDCAB, per WP:DUCK evidence of sockpuppetry.
All 3 are clearly located in Nashville, TN (IPs geolocate, and registered user has self-identified as once having posted from one of the IPs)
All 3 share a common opinion, and are seeking to oppose the classification of airports as Focus Cities unless the airline says so in a primary source.
Clear evidence of the use of multiple identities to make an opinion held by only a single person look more widely held.
I'm not sure if multiple users are able to post comments, but I'd like to note that on this very case, 96.5.66.240 has added responses which have then been re-branded as being from 45Factoid44. This is not an isolated case, either. While a shared IP is always a possibility, I find it extremely coincidental that three people from the same school could all being fervently interested in protesting airline focus cities and hubs (not exactly a broad and popular topic, I think) and that two, specifically, could verge on the same article. All three users also appear to have the same short-temper, as can be seen in various edit comments and replies. NcSchu( Talk) 17:42, 2 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Noting that 45Factiod44 and 96.5.66.240 both cleaned up their user spaces within 5 minutes of each other today. What a co-incidence! Mayalld ( talk) 15:30, 4 November 2008 (UTC) reply
This disruptive editing and elusiveness is continuing to the present so I am blocking all three for a week. — Wknight94 ( talk) 16:23, 14 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Mayalld ( talk) 10:23, 30 October 2008 (UTC) reply
45Factoid44 has previously disclosed that he formerly edited from 96.5.66.240, but when that IP began editing and showing ownership in a MEDCAB case raised by 45Factoid44, it was denied that the two were the same person, or that they even knew each other. I closed the MEDCAB, per WP:DUCK evidence of sockpuppetry.
All 3 are clearly located in Nashville, TN (IPs geolocate, and registered user has self-identified as once having posted from one of the IPs)
All 3 share a common opinion, and are seeking to oppose the classification of airports as Focus Cities unless the airline says so in a primary source.
Clear evidence of the use of multiple identities to make an opinion held by only a single person look more widely held.
I'm not sure if multiple users are able to post comments, but I'd like to note that on this very case, 96.5.66.240 has added responses which have then been re-branded as being from 45Factoid44. This is not an isolated case, either. While a shared IP is always a possibility, I find it extremely coincidental that three people from the same school could all being fervently interested in protesting airline focus cities and hubs (not exactly a broad and popular topic, I think) and that two, specifically, could verge on the same article. All three users also appear to have the same short-temper, as can be seen in various edit comments and replies. NcSchu( Talk) 17:42, 2 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Noting that 45Factiod44 and 96.5.66.240 both cleaned up their user spaces within 5 minutes of each other today. What a co-incidence! Mayalld ( talk) 15:30, 4 November 2008 (UTC) reply
This disruptive editing and elusiveness is continuing to the present so I am blocking all three for a week. — Wknight94 ( talk) 16:23, 14 November 2008 (UTC) reply