189.106.*.* (
talk
+ ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
tag ·
block user ·
block log ·
CheckUser)
Extra evidence after first report:
Blocked the accounts some days ago. The IPs are dynamic and only used for a couple of hours, no point in blocking them now. Semi-protection is currently not justified due to low rate of edits. Rangeblock would be overkill (>10 constructive edits every day).
Procedure: Report obvious sock IPs that are active (edited < 1 hour ago) and accounts to WP:AIV with link to this page, they don't need a warning (already received enough), block IPs for a couple of hours/single purpose socks indef. In case this user persists, semi-protection can be considered at WP:RFPP or my talk page. -- Oxymoron 83 16:52, 22 December 2008 (UTC) reply
189.106.*.* (
talk
+ ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
tag ·
block user ·
block log ·
CheckUser)
Extra evidence after first report:
Blocked the accounts some days ago. The IPs are dynamic and only used for a couple of hours, no point in blocking them now. Semi-protection is currently not justified due to low rate of edits. Rangeblock would be overkill (>10 constructive edits every day).
Procedure: Report obvious sock IPs that are active (edited < 1 hour ago) and accounts to WP:AIV with link to this page, they don't need a warning (already received enough), block IPs for a couple of hours/single purpose socks indef. In case this user persists, semi-protection can be considered at WP:RFPP or my talk page. -- Oxymoron 83 16:52, 22 December 2008 (UTC) reply