Home • Search • Translate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2014-10-25 (Suspected copyright violations)
  • Author states he wrote the article there first, as their notability standards are lower, then created it here with the same content. The user name is the same in both places, and that would make the source PD, regardless of the shadiness they impart on WP-to-Alpha articles, so I think we're ok here. Crow Caw 22:36, 4 November 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Most of the major hits are book titles, of which many are named in the article. Remaining hits are small and essentially factual (" a B.A. in philosophy magna cum laude from Brandeis University"), etc. Crow Caw 20:58, 1 November 2014 (UTC) reply
  • From what I can dig up, the speech itself would be PD as the author died in 1945, but the quoted material is a translation, thereby generating a new copyright. Checking now with the author as to where they got the translation, in case it is a US Gov, thus PD. Crow Caw 23:39, 1 November 2014 (UTC) reply
  • See talk page of article. Author states the source is from Nat'l Archives, but does not have a linkable source or a NARA record ID. Pinging @ Moonriddengirl: for advice here, (rather than for the Wikialpha thing at the top of today, which I think I have sorted). The fragment of the speech quoted here appears in several sources, most calling it the "Stalingrad speech" as this article does. I was able to source the entire speech (called by a different name) to ibiblio, which calls itself "free" but I can't find the copyright statement saying so. So summoning MRG with the traditional offering of a Wine & Cheese plate. :) Crow Caw 22:36, 4 November 2014 (UTC) reply
  • On this one, we are probably fine, since we are not entirely sure who translated it, but whether it's NARA or FBIS, it would likely be public domain, and if it was an individual instead, it would be PD from not having a renewed copyright. While I'd prefer more concrete proof of where the translation was originally from, I don't see this as one worth going after. Wizardman 00:24, 17 November 2014 (UTC) reply
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Suspected_copyright_violations/2014-10-25&oldid=1084291892"
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2014-10-25 (Suspected copyright violations)
  • Author states he wrote the article there first, as their notability standards are lower, then created it here with the same content. The user name is the same in both places, and that would make the source PD, regardless of the shadiness they impart on WP-to-Alpha articles, so I think we're ok here. Crow Caw 22:36, 4 November 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Most of the major hits are book titles, of which many are named in the article. Remaining hits are small and essentially factual (" a B.A. in philosophy magna cum laude from Brandeis University"), etc. Crow Caw 20:58, 1 November 2014 (UTC) reply
  • From what I can dig up, the speech itself would be PD as the author died in 1945, but the quoted material is a translation, thereby generating a new copyright. Checking now with the author as to where they got the translation, in case it is a US Gov, thus PD. Crow Caw 23:39, 1 November 2014 (UTC) reply
  • See talk page of article. Author states the source is from Nat'l Archives, but does not have a linkable source or a NARA record ID. Pinging @ Moonriddengirl: for advice here, (rather than for the Wikialpha thing at the top of today, which I think I have sorted). The fragment of the speech quoted here appears in several sources, most calling it the "Stalingrad speech" as this article does. I was able to source the entire speech (called by a different name) to ibiblio, which calls itself "free" but I can't find the copyright statement saying so. So summoning MRG with the traditional offering of a Wine & Cheese plate. :) Crow Caw 22:36, 4 November 2014 (UTC) reply
  • On this one, we are probably fine, since we are not entirely sure who translated it, but whether it's NARA or FBIS, it would likely be public domain, and if it was an individual instead, it would be PD from not having a renewed copyright. While I'd prefer more concrete proof of where the translation was originally from, I don't see this as one worth going after. Wizardman 00:24, 17 November 2014 (UTC) reply
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Suspected_copyright_violations/2014-10-25&oldid=1084291892"

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook




Top Of Page

Home • Search • Translate

© CSE