From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2012-08-27 (Suspected copyright violations)
Content is a Philippine law, which would appear to be subject to some restrictions (non-commercial use forbidden) per Philippine_copyright_law#Government_copyright. Removed. Hut 8.5 10:41, 28 August 2012 (UTC) reply
I recall some conversation a few years ago about the copyrightability of statutes in the US regardless of their status in the country of origin, so I'll be looking into that, but otherwise this is cleared. VernoWhitney ( talk) 14:45, 28 August 2012 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2012-08-27 (Suspected copyright violations)
Content is a Philippine law, which would appear to be subject to some restrictions (non-commercial use forbidden) per Philippine_copyright_law#Government_copyright. Removed. Hut 8.5 10:41, 28 August 2012 (UTC) reply
I recall some conversation a few years ago about the copyrightability of statutes in the US regardless of their status in the country of origin, so I'll be looking into that, but otherwise this is cleared. VernoWhitney ( talk) 14:45, 28 August 2012 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook