I recall some conversation a few years ago about the copyrightability of statutes in the US regardless of their status in the country of origin, so I'll be looking into that, but otherwise this is cleared.
VernoWhitney (
talk)
14:45, 28 August 2012 (UTC)reply
No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. PD with no limitation on commercial use per
[1] Sections 175, 176. Also an
edict of government so in the U.S. we're free to ignore their claimed commercial restrictions regardless.
VernoWhitney (
talk)
15:37, 28 August 2012 (UTC)reply
I recall some conversation a few years ago about the copyrightability of statutes in the US regardless of their status in the country of origin, so I'll be looking into that, but otherwise this is cleared.
VernoWhitney (
talk)
14:45, 28 August 2012 (UTC)reply
No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. PD with no limitation on commercial use per
[1] Sections 175, 176. Also an
edict of government so in the U.S. we're free to ignore their claimed commercial restrictions regardless.
VernoWhitney (
talk)
15:37, 28 August 2012 (UTC)reply