From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  • There is a disagreement about whether they should be merged back together, I have added appropriate attribution in the mean time, so as far as copyvio it should be resolved. Monty 845 20:42, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
  • There is a disagreement about whether they should be merged back together, I have added appropriate attribution in the mean time, so as far as copyvio it should be resolved. Monty 845 20:47, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
  • Original article deleted G12. Monty 845 20:59, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
  • Article blanked for evaluation and closure through WP:CP. Monty 845 20:59, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:21, 15 May 2012 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Cleaned by User: DGG. Monty 845 21:10, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
  • Rephrased to avoid close paraphrasing. Monty 845 21:18, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
  • Current version does not appear to be a copyvio, copyvio was in original revision, so no way to clean history without destroying attribution. Monty 845 21:25, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
  • Most of the article text is the poem itself, which is obviously PD, there was one copied sentence that would not be PD, and it has been rephrased. Monty 845 21:34, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
  • Copied as a template for new article, attribution corrected. Monty 845 21:39, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
  • Same author, new topic, no need for attribution based on the report, there may be a page somewhere to which the formatting should be attributed, but no evidence here of it. Monty 845 21:43, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
  • Need an admin to check the source article that was deleted G7 to see if hist merge is needed Monty 845 21:04, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  • There is a disagreement about whether they should be merged back together, I have added appropriate attribution in the mean time, so as far as copyvio it should be resolved. Monty 845 20:42, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
  • There is a disagreement about whether they should be merged back together, I have added appropriate attribution in the mean time, so as far as copyvio it should be resolved. Monty 845 20:47, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
  • Original article deleted G12. Monty 845 20:59, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
  • Article blanked for evaluation and closure through WP:CP. Monty 845 20:59, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:21, 15 May 2012 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Cleaned by User: DGG. Monty 845 21:10, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
  • Rephrased to avoid close paraphrasing. Monty 845 21:18, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
  • Current version does not appear to be a copyvio, copyvio was in original revision, so no way to clean history without destroying attribution. Monty 845 21:25, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
  • Most of the article text is the poem itself, which is obviously PD, there was one copied sentence that would not be PD, and it has been rephrased. Monty 845 21:34, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
  • Copied as a template for new article, attribution corrected. Monty 845 21:39, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
  • Same author, new topic, no need for attribution based on the report, there may be a page somewhere to which the formatting should be attributed, but no evidence here of it. Monty 845 21:43, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply
  • Need an admin to check the source article that was deleted G7 to see if hist merge is needed Monty 845 21:04, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook