The result of the debate was speedy delete
Looks like we have another potential Maoririder on our hands...
User:Potatomaster27 has created a handful of...interesting... templates, of which this is one (the other two are below). A split by a specific people within a country goes against stub precedent, and there is no evidence that this would find anywhere near enough usage for a separate stub type. Red-linked category, and this is only used on a user page. Usefully (?) there is also a redlinked, non-existent WikiProject. The icon would probably be offensive to many true Cossacks, too. delete
Grutness...
wha?
01:30, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was speedy delete
And now we get into weightier territory. There are only 48 articles in
Category:Klingons, so the chances of 650 stubs is remote, to say the least - plus we've recently been in long talks with the Star Trek WikiProject about splitting the Star Trek stubs, and this wasn't the way decided. Another redlinked WikiProject on this one, but a blue-linked cat 9also nominated). Delete with a capital d.
Grutness...
wha?
01:30, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete
The mind boggles. Several articles, all with tsome 9often very tenuous) link to potatoes. The category is, to say the least, interesting, and there's no sign of the red-linked WikiProject Potato. The template has interwiki links to Catalan and Czech templates, which unfortunately are on German geography. As does Klingon-stub. Delete with a capital potato.
Grutness...
wha?
01:30, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was no consensus
Not necessary. Feeds into
Category:Square Enix stubs, which has fewer than 40 stubs, let alone being close to needing to be split. And the template is, erm, not standard, to say the least. Delete.
Grutness...
wha?
01:30, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
reply
Comment: I wonder why there are multiple Final Fantasy and Dragon Quest stubs that pertain to individual games or characters? Why not have one universal Final Fantasy stub and one universal Dragon Quest stub? Those might serve to remove redundant stubs. If there would be just one Square Enix stub, then it should be okay to remove all other Square Enix stubs. I suppose there is concern about the existence of excessive stubs. Though, it can be tricky when elements of a franchise expand beyond the ownership of Square Enix, such as the Dragon Quest manga and anime. (I heard that these weren't owned by Enix, but I could be mistaken.)-- Rika95 21:25, 21 February 2007 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was speedy delete
Looks like we have another potential Maoririder on our hands...
User:Potatomaster27 has created a handful of...interesting... templates, of which this is one (the other two are below). A split by a specific people within a country goes against stub precedent, and there is no evidence that this would find anywhere near enough usage for a separate stub type. Red-linked category, and this is only used on a user page. Usefully (?) there is also a redlinked, non-existent WikiProject. The icon would probably be offensive to many true Cossacks, too. delete
Grutness...
wha?
01:30, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was speedy delete
And now we get into weightier territory. There are only 48 articles in
Category:Klingons, so the chances of 650 stubs is remote, to say the least - plus we've recently been in long talks with the Star Trek WikiProject about splitting the Star Trek stubs, and this wasn't the way decided. Another redlinked WikiProject on this one, but a blue-linked cat 9also nominated). Delete with a capital d.
Grutness...
wha?
01:30, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete
The mind boggles. Several articles, all with tsome 9often very tenuous) link to potatoes. The category is, to say the least, interesting, and there's no sign of the red-linked WikiProject Potato. The template has interwiki links to Catalan and Czech templates, which unfortunately are on German geography. As does Klingon-stub. Delete with a capital potato.
Grutness...
wha?
01:30, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was no consensus
Not necessary. Feeds into
Category:Square Enix stubs, which has fewer than 40 stubs, let alone being close to needing to be split. And the template is, erm, not standard, to say the least. Delete.
Grutness...
wha?
01:30, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
reply
Comment: I wonder why there are multiple Final Fantasy and Dragon Quest stubs that pertain to individual games or characters? Why not have one universal Final Fantasy stub and one universal Dragon Quest stub? Those might serve to remove redundant stubs. If there would be just one Square Enix stub, then it should be okay to remove all other Square Enix stubs. I suppose there is concern about the existence of excessive stubs. Though, it can be tricky when elements of a franchise expand beyond the ownership of Square Enix, such as the Dragon Quest manga and anime. (I heard that these weren't owned by Enix, but I could be mistaken.)-- Rika95 21:25, 21 February 2007 (UTC) reply