From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Wwilloughby

Wwilloughby ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)
22 September 2012
Suspected sockpuppets

Repeated addition of inappropriate list entries of individuals in violation of WP:MOSLIST, WP:NOTDIR, and WP:Source list on List of CNN anchors. Continued after level 4 warning and repeated attempts to communicate on article talk page and user's talk page. After level 4 warning given, rather than going beyond the level 4, the same edits were made under the username User talk:Cameronperkins. This page history shows connection between accounts for User:Wwilloughby, User talk:Perkins FC2, and IP 65.191.181.27, editing the other editor's sandboxes. User talk:Cameronperkins has repeatedly created articles violating copyright about subjects related to CNN. History of this page [1] indicates subject may also be editing as User:Wwilloughby, with Wwilloughby also editing sandbox pages of Perkins FC2. May have missed other accounts. Cindy( talk to me) 07:33, 22 September 2012 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I would like to comment on the charge of sock-puppetry.
Perkins FC2 is not Cameronperkins. While we share the same IP address, we have different interests and different levels of training, expertise, and recieve advice from different Wikipedia usage "coaches." Since i did not know Cameronperkins was editing Wikipedia pages, I have now asked Cameronperkins to refrain from posting until he is better trained on the Wikipedia rules.
While Perkins FC2 and Wwilloughby are not the same person, Wwilloughby has assisted Perkins FC2 with technical issues. Any belief that there is an effort to use two accounts for one user is not true. Possible mistakes are not intentional, and are probably a lack of understanding. No offense, the rules for Wikipedia are hard to understand for the layperson. I hope this is helpful to the case and is the right way to post .... That is even unclear to me. Perkins FC2 ( talk) 12:45, 23 September 2012 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Wwilloughby

Wwilloughby ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)
22 September 2012
Suspected sockpuppets

Repeated addition of inappropriate list entries of individuals in violation of WP:MOSLIST, WP:NOTDIR, and WP:Source list on List of CNN anchors. Continued after level 4 warning and repeated attempts to communicate on article talk page and user's talk page. After level 4 warning given, rather than going beyond the level 4, the same edits were made under the username User talk:Cameronperkins. This page history shows connection between accounts for User:Wwilloughby, User talk:Perkins FC2, and IP 65.191.181.27, editing the other editor's sandboxes. User talk:Cameronperkins has repeatedly created articles violating copyright about subjects related to CNN. History of this page [1] indicates subject may also be editing as User:Wwilloughby, with Wwilloughby also editing sandbox pages of Perkins FC2. May have missed other accounts. Cindy( talk to me) 07:33, 22 September 2012 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I would like to comment on the charge of sock-puppetry.
Perkins FC2 is not Cameronperkins. While we share the same IP address, we have different interests and different levels of training, expertise, and recieve advice from different Wikipedia usage "coaches." Since i did not know Cameronperkins was editing Wikipedia pages, I have now asked Cameronperkins to refrain from posting until he is better trained on the Wikipedia rules.
While Perkins FC2 and Wwilloughby are not the same person, Wwilloughby has assisted Perkins FC2 with technical issues. Any belief that there is an effort to use two accounts for one user is not true. Possible mistakes are not intentional, and are probably a lack of understanding. No offense, the rules for Wikipedia are hard to understand for the layperson. I hope this is helpful to the case and is the right way to post .... That is even unclear to me. Perkins FC2 ( talk) 12:45, 23 September 2012 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook