All accounts (two of them recently activated) engage in an identical edit-warring pattern on Babek (ballet), in an apparent attempt to avoid breaking WP:3RR and/or bait others into breaking it: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. --> Parishan ( talk) 17:15, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Recent revision history of page Arijit Singh
The page was initially persistently vandalized by the master sock account e.g- deleting references and replacing it by citation needed tag (disruptive editing). Removing direct quotes violating MOS:PMC policy. Intentional acts of removing contents and justifying it by misinterpreting policies by master sock account. It's quite interesting to note that the suspected sock account Intoxicatedmidnight was created in June 2017 , when the disruptive editing by the mastersock begun. Recently the suspected sock Intoxicatedmidnght vandalized contents on the same page. It is to be noted that the suspected mastersock Umair Aj was previously blocked for edit warring and multiple abusive use of accounts. Anoptimistix Let's Talk 04:46, 6 August 2017 (UTC) Anoptimistix Let's Talk 04:46, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
I have reported User:Anoptimistix for sockpuppeting [8] a few days ago because being a fan he was vandalizing Arjit Singh. The article resembles a fan site and me as well as other editors removed the promotional content as it had serious issues of impartiality of tone, undue weight, peacocking and overuse of quotes. My removal of POV content was not objected by any editor less Anoptimistix and here [9] is the evidence of his false claims. So logically speaking being well versed with the consequences of sockpuppeting, I have no need to create multiple accounts. Moreover, he has reported me to WP:ANI several times but did not get the desired results. My best guess is Anoptimistix himself created his sock and just trying to put all this on me not knowing that such actions cannot remain hidden from an SPI clerk.- Umair Aj ( talk) 10:22, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Reply : Well Umair Aj thanks for sharing SPI report, where I was proved as innocent. But you really need to understand what is vandalism WP:Vand defines vandalism as any addition, removal, or change of content, in a deliberate attempt to damage Wikipedia, which you are doing since many days admins and other users too warned you on your talk page for vandalizing contents many times. Anoptimistix Let's Talk 15:59, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Reply by Anoptimistix - Well I do not intend to interrupt SPI investigation or comment in other users section but as the suspected Master sock (who were also previously blocked for sockpuppeting) are making personal attacks on me, I have no option except reply. Firstly the page of Arijit Singh was not created by me, secondly trusted prolific and great administrator who is also a checkuser who goes by username Materialscientist visited that page several times for reverting vandalism, they never raised any objection on any contents which were edited by several editors over years, much before I joined wikipedia. And recently administrator Hyacinth made edits on the page like fixing inlinks when the page was admin protected, but didn't removed anything and also administrator CambridgeBayWeather fixed the vandalized direct quotes by observing the original wording policy, the original quotes we're smartly twisted by Umair Aj. These admins are respected, prolific and have decades of editing experience. I still stand by my checkuser request, as checkuser can only check how many accounts were used by a single person for editing Wikipedia. Anoptimistix Let's Talk 12:10, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
'Sunrays21' was created by an IP(and other IPs) after semi-protection of pages they were vandalizing. Both 'Sunrays21' and 'Umair Aj' are stalking my edits since last couple of days, it can not be a coincidence. Both these account edit only those pages I have edited earlier. Earlier they were using IPs, one of which was blocked earlier. DHSULP ( talk) 10:30, 13 August 2017 (UTC) DHSULP ( talk) 10:30, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Currently there is a sock puppet investigation going on against this user here [10] and he has been previously blocked here [11]. I have also reported him at WP:AN/3RR. This might be a counter attack from the sock.- Umair Aj ( talk) 10:39, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
See below. Bbb23 ( talk) 21:47, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
All accounts (two of them recently activated) engage in an identical edit-warring pattern on Babek (ballet), in an apparent attempt to avoid breaking WP:3RR and/or bait others into breaking it: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. --> Parishan ( talk) 17:15, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Recent revision history of page Arijit Singh
The page was initially persistently vandalized by the master sock account e.g- deleting references and replacing it by citation needed tag (disruptive editing). Removing direct quotes violating MOS:PMC policy. Intentional acts of removing contents and justifying it by misinterpreting policies by master sock account. It's quite interesting to note that the suspected sock account Intoxicatedmidnight was created in June 2017 , when the disruptive editing by the mastersock begun. Recently the suspected sock Intoxicatedmidnght vandalized contents on the same page. It is to be noted that the suspected mastersock Umair Aj was previously blocked for edit warring and multiple abusive use of accounts. Anoptimistix Let's Talk 04:46, 6 August 2017 (UTC) Anoptimistix Let's Talk 04:46, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
I have reported User:Anoptimistix for sockpuppeting [8] a few days ago because being a fan he was vandalizing Arjit Singh. The article resembles a fan site and me as well as other editors removed the promotional content as it had serious issues of impartiality of tone, undue weight, peacocking and overuse of quotes. My removal of POV content was not objected by any editor less Anoptimistix and here [9] is the evidence of his false claims. So logically speaking being well versed with the consequences of sockpuppeting, I have no need to create multiple accounts. Moreover, he has reported me to WP:ANI several times but did not get the desired results. My best guess is Anoptimistix himself created his sock and just trying to put all this on me not knowing that such actions cannot remain hidden from an SPI clerk.- Umair Aj ( talk) 10:22, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Reply : Well Umair Aj thanks for sharing SPI report, where I was proved as innocent. But you really need to understand what is vandalism WP:Vand defines vandalism as any addition, removal, or change of content, in a deliberate attempt to damage Wikipedia, which you are doing since many days admins and other users too warned you on your talk page for vandalizing contents many times. Anoptimistix Let's Talk 15:59, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Reply by Anoptimistix - Well I do not intend to interrupt SPI investigation or comment in other users section but as the suspected Master sock (who were also previously blocked for sockpuppeting) are making personal attacks on me, I have no option except reply. Firstly the page of Arijit Singh was not created by me, secondly trusted prolific and great administrator who is also a checkuser who goes by username Materialscientist visited that page several times for reverting vandalism, they never raised any objection on any contents which were edited by several editors over years, much before I joined wikipedia. And recently administrator Hyacinth made edits on the page like fixing inlinks when the page was admin protected, but didn't removed anything and also administrator CambridgeBayWeather fixed the vandalized direct quotes by observing the original wording policy, the original quotes we're smartly twisted by Umair Aj. These admins are respected, prolific and have decades of editing experience. I still stand by my checkuser request, as checkuser can only check how many accounts were used by a single person for editing Wikipedia. Anoptimistix Let's Talk 12:10, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
'Sunrays21' was created by an IP(and other IPs) after semi-protection of pages they were vandalizing. Both 'Sunrays21' and 'Umair Aj' are stalking my edits since last couple of days, it can not be a coincidence. Both these account edit only those pages I have edited earlier. Earlier they were using IPs, one of which was blocked earlier. DHSULP ( talk) 10:30, 13 August 2017 (UTC) DHSULP ( talk) 10:30, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Currently there is a sock puppet investigation going on against this user here [10] and he has been previously blocked here [11]. I have also reported him at WP:AN/3RR. This might be a counter attack from the sock.- Umair Aj ( talk) 10:39, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
See below. Bbb23 ( talk) 21:47, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.