Trendsies ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

10 October 2010

Suspected sockpuppets

• Nazarethian ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Ip101 ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Evidence submitted by Sven Manguard

This is a cut and past from ANI, where sockpuppetry in an AfD became an issue in a discussion on an article.

User:Trendsies and User:Nazarethian are  Confirmed. User:Ip101 is  Possible to the former two due to similar approximate geographical location and user agents. – MuZemike 21:52, 10 October 2010 (UTC) reply

No one got banned despite the sockpuppetry. This is a request for a confirm and block, and may not need a full investigation. Sven Manguard _Talk 22:54, 10 October 2010 (UTC) reply

Comments by accused parties   

See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 Administrator note Not blocking Ip101 ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki) due to differences in behavior combined with only a "possible" result. Blocked the sockpuppet. Sockmaster blocked 1 week. -- Shirik ( Questions or Comments?) 17:02, 11 October 2010 (UTC) reply

• Nothing left to do here. -- DQ (t) (e) 17:03, 11 October 2010 (UTC) reply