From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Starstarstar123

Starstarstar123 ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)

03 June 2016

Suspected sockpuppets


Starmaker1234 is a disruptive editor who has been blocked for vandalism, including persistent hoaxing on rugby league related articles. To copy-paste from my ANI report,

Some edits are bald-faced, blatant vandalism: 1 2 3
Others are less so. Examples of hoaxing include this (details of a match that has yet to be played), this (again, details of a match that has yet to be played), this (false information) and this (again, false statistics).

These three accounts meanwhile are obvious WP:DUCKs quacking with very similar behaviour; for Cheeselandbac, this includes rugby league-related hoaxing 1, vandalism to rugby league articles 2 and other petty vandalism 3 in a similar fashion to Starmaker1234.

For Starstarstar123, this includes rugby league-related hoaxing 1 2, and vandalism to William Shakespeare 3, the exact same edit as Starmaker1234's vandal edit #3 above. Not to mention the similar usernames.

Johntraviola, despite having only three edits, is another hoaxer on rugby league articles 1 with a similar editing style to the above socks.

This nonsense has gone on since March '15 and over hundreds of edits unnoticed, and needs to be stopped now. Sleeper check requested. Satellizer el Bridget  (Talk) 14:01, 3 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Surely Starmaker1234 and Cheeselandabc aren't, though, as their last edits were in late May? Even if that isn't doable, I daresay WP:DUCK still applies, and even if DUCK isn't usable the individual accounts should still be blocked for hoaxing and disruption. I requested CheckUser mostly to see if there were sleepers. Satellizer el Bridget  (Talk) 05:36, 4 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Unfortunately, main range is from a large educational service provider and so there would be heavy collateral damage, I'm afraid. There are two subranges that can and will be blocked. -- Avi ( talk) 16:11, 5 June 2016 (UTC) reply

@ Vanjagenije: Thoughts on Johntraviola? Mike VTalk 02:44, 7 June 2016 (UTC) reply

10 June 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

  Sounds like a duck quacking into a megaphone to me, further hoaxing on rugby league-related articles Satellizer el Bridget  (Talk) 11:43, 10 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Yes, it seems User:Cricketgalore is another sock from the same master. Mattlore ( talk) 02:16, 22 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Clerk note: @ Satellizer: Can you list and provide an explanation for representative diffs from 211.30.131.54 and Starstarstar123 or a sock from the archives? I flipped through a couple random contribs and saw no immediate red flags. You're more familiar with this sock drawer, can you explain? Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 20:25, 11 June 2016 (UTC) reply
This guy has had a long history of introducing hoaxes to articles, especially in the form of details/results of rugby league sports matches that have yet to be announced and/or played. 211.30.131.54 has vandalized‎ 2017 Rugby League World Cup and 2016 Rugby League Four Nations with his fake nonsense, mirroring Starmaker1234's efforts on 2016 State of Origin series, 2016 Rugby League Trans-Tasman Test Match, Cheeselandabc's vandalism on 2017 State of Origin series as well as 2017 Rugby League World Cup (same article as this IP). A quick glance at the other sockpuppets' edits will show very similar editing styles and hoaxes. Satellizer el Bridget  (Talk) 03:53, 12 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Try these edits [5] [6] compared to this [7] Mattlore ( talk) 20:44, 27 June 2016 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Starstarstar123

Starstarstar123 ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)

03 June 2016

Suspected sockpuppets


Starmaker1234 is a disruptive editor who has been blocked for vandalism, including persistent hoaxing on rugby league related articles. To copy-paste from my ANI report,

Some edits are bald-faced, blatant vandalism: 1 2 3
Others are less so. Examples of hoaxing include this (details of a match that has yet to be played), this (again, details of a match that has yet to be played), this (false information) and this (again, false statistics).

These three accounts meanwhile are obvious WP:DUCKs quacking with very similar behaviour; for Cheeselandbac, this includes rugby league-related hoaxing 1, vandalism to rugby league articles 2 and other petty vandalism 3 in a similar fashion to Starmaker1234.

For Starstarstar123, this includes rugby league-related hoaxing 1 2, and vandalism to William Shakespeare 3, the exact same edit as Starmaker1234's vandal edit #3 above. Not to mention the similar usernames.

Johntraviola, despite having only three edits, is another hoaxer on rugby league articles 1 with a similar editing style to the above socks.

This nonsense has gone on since March '15 and over hundreds of edits unnoticed, and needs to be stopped now. Sleeper check requested. Satellizer el Bridget  (Talk) 14:01, 3 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Surely Starmaker1234 and Cheeselandabc aren't, though, as their last edits were in late May? Even if that isn't doable, I daresay WP:DUCK still applies, and even if DUCK isn't usable the individual accounts should still be blocked for hoaxing and disruption. I requested CheckUser mostly to see if there were sleepers. Satellizer el Bridget  (Talk) 05:36, 4 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Unfortunately, main range is from a large educational service provider and so there would be heavy collateral damage, I'm afraid. There are two subranges that can and will be blocked. -- Avi ( talk) 16:11, 5 June 2016 (UTC) reply

@ Vanjagenije: Thoughts on Johntraviola? Mike VTalk 02:44, 7 June 2016 (UTC) reply

10 June 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

  Sounds like a duck quacking into a megaphone to me, further hoaxing on rugby league-related articles Satellizer el Bridget  (Talk) 11:43, 10 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Yes, it seems User:Cricketgalore is another sock from the same master. Mattlore ( talk) 02:16, 22 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Clerk note: @ Satellizer: Can you list and provide an explanation for representative diffs from 211.30.131.54 and Starstarstar123 or a sock from the archives? I flipped through a couple random contribs and saw no immediate red flags. You're more familiar with this sock drawer, can you explain? Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 20:25, 11 June 2016 (UTC) reply
This guy has had a long history of introducing hoaxes to articles, especially in the form of details/results of rugby league sports matches that have yet to be announced and/or played. 211.30.131.54 has vandalized‎ 2017 Rugby League World Cup and 2016 Rugby League Four Nations with his fake nonsense, mirroring Starmaker1234's efforts on 2016 State of Origin series, 2016 Rugby League Trans-Tasman Test Match, Cheeselandabc's vandalism on 2017 State of Origin series as well as 2017 Rugby League World Cup (same article as this IP). A quick glance at the other sockpuppets' edits will show very similar editing styles and hoaxes. Satellizer el Bridget  (Talk) 03:53, 12 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Try these edits [5] [6] compared to this [7] Mattlore ( talk) 20:44, 27 June 2016 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook