Squeezdot ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

21 August 2010

Suspected sockpuppets

• Squeezedot ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• AmyGray1226 ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Evidence submitted by Cameron Scott

Repeated attempts to recreate deleted article, all accounts edit the same sub-set of articles to add 'Michael "Mic" Neumann' to articles or to create articles about 'Michael "Mic" Neumann' (recented deleted at AFD). Recent An/I report about this editor at: second entry, sorry I don't know how to do the specific link within the archive Cameron Scott ( talk) 18:09, 21 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Comments by accused parties   

See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 Administrator note Two newer accounts blocked as pretty obvious socks - same focus on the same articles and talk pages. Oldest account, Squeezdot, blocked for two weeks. TN X Man 21:45, 21 August 2010 (UTC) reply

17 December 2013

Suspected sockpuppets

• 50.14.3.215 ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser ( log))
• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

Editing history mostly relates to Michael Mic Neumann and related projects. This edit is also an admission of identity. Rob Sinden ( talk) 13:06, 17 December 2013 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

And at Talk:Kung Faux, another Neumann related article, Squeezdot identified himself as Neumann. [1]. I've raised the IP at WP:COIN. I blocked Squeezdot indefinitely in August 2010 for "Abusing multiple accounts: clearly doesn't intend to respect block, continues to create sockpuppets". Dougweller ( talk) 13:38, 17 December 2013 (UTC) reply

Also see this old ANI report. [2] Dougweller ( talk) 14:30, 17 December 2013 (UTC) reply

• I support an escalating block to protect from COI and PROMO, because it's a fixed IP (no collateral damage), long-term single purpose account, continuously pushing promo at Helena Christensen(inserting self as co-founder), Kung Faux (massive COI buildup, though RS), overwriting Mess John with promo without disambiguation, COI, PROMO, primary source insertion into The Sucklord. Also http://www.popdetail.com [3] is COI cited as a source for insertion [4] into articles such as Yuko Shimizu (illustrator) (since removed). I didn't know about the 2010 indefinite blocks of Squeezdot et al. It may be possible to train Neumann to stop COI editing, and comply with WP:COI procedures, but I have a doubt. -- Lexein ( talk) 03:11, 19 December 2013 (UTC) reply

This can be closed, I've blocked the IP as a long term block evader. The original account always made it clear he would sock. Dougweller ( talk) 11:51, 19 December 2013 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

• Note: IP blocked one year. Mark Arsten ( talk) 20:22, 19 December 2013 (UTC) reply