From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Speaktruth29

Speaktruth29 ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)

06 May 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

Creating a false impression of support by pushing the same point of view from multiple "truth" accounts, adding what they perceive to be "some facts". Compare user names, edit summaries, account creation date, editing overlap, editing timing. Example for the pushing / edit warring: [1] [2] [3]. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:37, 6 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Based on the behaviour, I'm comfortable with the link between Speaktruth29, Truth4Upeople and the accounts I listed. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 05:49, 8 May 2020 (UTC) reply

17 October 2020

Suspected sockpuppets


Account made no edits from mid-February and was reactivated only by 31 August. [4]

Similar obsession with adding "controversy" sections on articles, [5] [6] and updating the section that he created on Sudarshan News which he created with his earlier sock. [7] [8] Aman Kumar Goel ( Talk) 05:25, 17 October 2020 (UTC) reply

@ Callanecc: His eagerness to add controversial content on BLPs then edit warring by solely relying on edit summaries, [9] [10] and marking of major addition of controversial content as "minor" while claiming his edits to be based on "facts" just indicates these all accounts belong to same socking master. [11] [12]
Indef the sockmaster "Speaktruth29" too, since he is still socking. Thanks. Aman Kumar Goel ( Talk) 05:16, 22 October 2020 (UTC) reply
@ Callanecc: Did you have a look? Aman Kumar Goel ( Talk) 06:20, 25 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • It's certainly technically  Possible that there is a link between Loveall.human and the previously blocked accounts but given the time that has passed I really can't do any more than that.  Behavioural evidence needs evaluation. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 02:21, 18 October 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Loveall.human is blocked and tagged. Closing. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 07:01, 8 November 2020 (UTC) reply

13 July 2021

Suspected sockpuppets


Loveall.human was blocked as a sock to this sock farm, but his unblock request was accepted, that's why I am reporting here. [13]

Loveall.human was under scrutiny after the unblock as his talk page shows, [14] that's why he is now using a new account named Shahinshah121 according to my suspicion.

  • Loveall.human came up with the idea " Rice Christian term is used in India. [15] Shahinshah121 further expanded this sentence further. [16]
  • Marks edits as 'minor' when adding 'citations'. [17] [18]
  • Falsely claims on edit summaries that he is adding more citation when he is writing a new paragraph. [19] [20]
  • Deliberately avoids signing his comments to look newbie. [21] [22] Aman Kumar Goel ( Talk) 04:40, 13 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Those similarities are sufficiently trivial that I do not see them as grounds for CU, and shared interests != sockpuppetry. Further, Shahinshah is two years older than Loveall.human, so that account could not have been created for the purpose of evading scrutiny following Loveall's block. Closing. GeneralNotability ( talk) 03:17, 14 July 2021 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Speaktruth29

Speaktruth29 ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)

06 May 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

Creating a false impression of support by pushing the same point of view from multiple "truth" accounts, adding what they perceive to be "some facts". Compare user names, edit summaries, account creation date, editing overlap, editing timing. Example for the pushing / edit warring: [1] [2] [3]. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:37, 6 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Based on the behaviour, I'm comfortable with the link between Speaktruth29, Truth4Upeople and the accounts I listed. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 05:49, 8 May 2020 (UTC) reply

17 October 2020

Suspected sockpuppets


Account made no edits from mid-February and was reactivated only by 31 August. [4]

Similar obsession with adding "controversy" sections on articles, [5] [6] and updating the section that he created on Sudarshan News which he created with his earlier sock. [7] [8] Aman Kumar Goel ( Talk) 05:25, 17 October 2020 (UTC) reply

@ Callanecc: His eagerness to add controversial content on BLPs then edit warring by solely relying on edit summaries, [9] [10] and marking of major addition of controversial content as "minor" while claiming his edits to be based on "facts" just indicates these all accounts belong to same socking master. [11] [12]
Indef the sockmaster "Speaktruth29" too, since he is still socking. Thanks. Aman Kumar Goel ( Talk) 05:16, 22 October 2020 (UTC) reply
@ Callanecc: Did you have a look? Aman Kumar Goel ( Talk) 06:20, 25 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • It's certainly technically  Possible that there is a link between Loveall.human and the previously blocked accounts but given the time that has passed I really can't do any more than that.  Behavioural evidence needs evaluation. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 02:21, 18 October 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Loveall.human is blocked and tagged. Closing. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 07:01, 8 November 2020 (UTC) reply

13 July 2021

Suspected sockpuppets


Loveall.human was blocked as a sock to this sock farm, but his unblock request was accepted, that's why I am reporting here. [13]

Loveall.human was under scrutiny after the unblock as his talk page shows, [14] that's why he is now using a new account named Shahinshah121 according to my suspicion.

  • Loveall.human came up with the idea " Rice Christian term is used in India. [15] Shahinshah121 further expanded this sentence further. [16]
  • Marks edits as 'minor' when adding 'citations'. [17] [18]
  • Falsely claims on edit summaries that he is adding more citation when he is writing a new paragraph. [19] [20]
  • Deliberately avoids signing his comments to look newbie. [21] [22] Aman Kumar Goel ( Talk) 04:40, 13 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Those similarities are sufficiently trivial that I do not see them as grounds for CU, and shared interests != sockpuppetry. Further, Shahinshah is two years older than Loveall.human, so that account could not have been created for the purpose of evading scrutiny following Loveall's block. Closing. GeneralNotability ( talk) 03:17, 14 July 2021 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook