User:Zephrine seems to be fanatically determined to apply a very major makeover to article "Classical language" for reasons that he or she can't really explain too clearly. After User:Zephrine made some missteps (deleting a reference, then denying that he or she deleted a reference -- something which did not build confidence -- among other things), a cloud of newly-created accounts sprang up whose sole real purpose is to defend User:Zephrine and/or remake article "Classical language" in the way desired by User:Zephrine. User:MyThreeDayReprieve has zero edits other than defending User:Zephrine (see Special:Contributions/MyThreeDayReprieve). User:Tersanctus has one edit other than defending User:Zephrine (see Special:Contributions/Tersanctus). User:BrooklynStateOfMind has about 15 edits not devoted to defending User:Zephrine, or remaking "Classical language" according to Zephrine's wishes, but I'm afraid that that's "Merely corroborative detail, intended to give artistic verisimilitude to an otherwise bald and unconvincing narrative" at this point (as Gilbert and Sullivan would say), since BrooklynStateOfMind made their first-ever edit on 06:36, 5 February 2019 [1], or a little more than two hours after I started pushing back against Zephrine's radical surgery on the "Classical language" article (I posted my first message on User talk:Zephrine at 04:18, 5 February 2019). I don't really know what Checkuser is, or whether it would be desirable or useful in this case -- I just want Zephrine and Zephrine's cloud of sockpuppet accounts to stop messing with the "Classical language" article (and my user talkpage)... AnonMoos ( talk) 15:17, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I've put this case on hold. I may need to consult with another CheckUser.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 16:26, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
See below. Bbb23 ( talk) 13:48, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Well except the interest in ME food and some obscure articles seemingly on unconnected topics [8], [9], [10].They show the same interest like SS or his socks
He have also similar interest general in ethnography as evident from the diffs and the contibs
@ TonyBallioni: I have sent you mail.If there will be admin that will make behavioral evaluation I am willing to send it to him too -- Shrike ( talk) 19:41, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
User:GeneralNotability sent -- Shrike ( talk) 18:32, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. Seraphim System often edited about Middle Eastern food, but with a noticeable pro-Turkish bias; from some discussions I had with her about food, as far as I understand she is Turkish; she was familiar with Turkish food from her own experience, and not so much with Arab: [21], and these comments especially 30 November, are something I can't imagine a Lebanese person saying. I'm sure JJNito197 is Lebanese as stated on their user page. It's very hard to believe Seraphim System would be making all those edits to Lebanese cuisine, or edits like these: [22], [23]. On the other hand, that's what I said last time - apparently she's a master of disguises though, and it could all be fake...? It's still very hard to believe she was Shofet tsaddiq. Shakes head. -- IamNotU ( talk) 00:23, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
User:Zephrine seems to be fanatically determined to apply a very major makeover to article "Classical language" for reasons that he or she can't really explain too clearly. After User:Zephrine made some missteps (deleting a reference, then denying that he or she deleted a reference -- something which did not build confidence -- among other things), a cloud of newly-created accounts sprang up whose sole real purpose is to defend User:Zephrine and/or remake article "Classical language" in the way desired by User:Zephrine. User:MyThreeDayReprieve has zero edits other than defending User:Zephrine (see Special:Contributions/MyThreeDayReprieve). User:Tersanctus has one edit other than defending User:Zephrine (see Special:Contributions/Tersanctus). User:BrooklynStateOfMind has about 15 edits not devoted to defending User:Zephrine, or remaking "Classical language" according to Zephrine's wishes, but I'm afraid that that's "Merely corroborative detail, intended to give artistic verisimilitude to an otherwise bald and unconvincing narrative" at this point (as Gilbert and Sullivan would say), since BrooklynStateOfMind made their first-ever edit on 06:36, 5 February 2019 [1], or a little more than two hours after I started pushing back against Zephrine's radical surgery on the "Classical language" article (I posted my first message on User talk:Zephrine at 04:18, 5 February 2019). I don't really know what Checkuser is, or whether it would be desirable or useful in this case -- I just want Zephrine and Zephrine's cloud of sockpuppet accounts to stop messing with the "Classical language" article (and my user talkpage)... AnonMoos ( talk) 15:17, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I've put this case on hold. I may need to consult with another CheckUser.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 16:26, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
See below. Bbb23 ( talk) 13:48, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Well except the interest in ME food and some obscure articles seemingly on unconnected topics [8], [9], [10].They show the same interest like SS or his socks
He have also similar interest general in ethnography as evident from the diffs and the contibs
@ TonyBallioni: I have sent you mail.If there will be admin that will make behavioral evaluation I am willing to send it to him too -- Shrike ( talk) 19:41, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
User:GeneralNotability sent -- Shrike ( talk) 18:32, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. Seraphim System often edited about Middle Eastern food, but with a noticeable pro-Turkish bias; from some discussions I had with her about food, as far as I understand she is Turkish; she was familiar with Turkish food from her own experience, and not so much with Arab: [21], and these comments especially 30 November, are something I can't imagine a Lebanese person saying. I'm sure JJNito197 is Lebanese as stated on their user page. It's very hard to believe Seraphim System would be making all those edits to Lebanese cuisine, or edits like these: [22], [23]. On the other hand, that's what I said last time - apparently she's a master of disguises though, and it could all be fake...? It's still very hard to believe she was Shofet tsaddiq. Shakes head. -- IamNotU ( talk) 00:23, 22 June 2020 (UTC)