All of them mainly edit on the same articles, all of them move the lead before the infobox template even after being recommended not to do so. DoebLoggs ( talk) 10:55, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Username is structurally similar to socks blocked earlier today. Main focus is on Sirajganj and Sirajganj District, like master and socks. Exhibits same quirk of moving lead before infobox. Continued attempts at socking seem inevitable, so strongly urge semi-protection or extended confirmed protection of Sirajganj and Sirajganj District as additional protection against disruption. -- Worldbruce ( talk) 17:13, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Same behaviour as above, same articles, same move of lede before the infobox template. DoebLoggs ( talk) 08:03, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Another loud quacking duck, same articles, same behaviour. DoebLoggs ( talk) 09:52, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Sixth sock in the past 48 hours focused on Sirajganj and Sirajganj District, places in Bangladesh of no great significance to most Bangladeshis. The articles have been on Wikipedia for 17 years. 65-75% of the edits to them have been in the past six weeks by Sauraved and their socks.
As has been noted before, they have a singular habit of moving the lead to before the infobox. [3] They also add language claiming the places are important, unsupported by sources. [4] [5] Another characteristic behaviour is adding religion and language bar charts and then fiddling endlessly with the 4th significant digit of religious percentages. [6] [7] [8] -- Worldbruce ( talk) 07:02, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
;)
--
Tamzin
cetacean needed (she/they)
01:46, 10 February 2022 (UTC)The unimaginatively named sock of the day is disrupting articles about upazilas (sub-districts) of Sirajganj District now that it and Sirajganj are protected. Example: [9] -- Worldbruce ( talk) 00:45, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Same style username as past socks. Same addition of religion bar charts to Bangladeshi district articles, without sufficiently defining a source to make the content verifiable. [10] Worldbruce ( talk) 06:30, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I've added a second account, one that started editing within 30 minutes of the first being blocked. Their first edit was to undo 24c.56.43c's addition of an improperly sourced religion bar to Bogra District. [11] Their next edits were to move the lead before the infobox on various Bangladeshi upazilla (sub-district) articles. [12] -- Worldbruce ( talk) 07:46, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Again, same type of edits, same weird habit to move the lead before the infobox template. See here for example: [13] DoebLoggs ( talk) 12:22, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Usual habit of moving lead before infobox on Bangladeshi political geography articles. [14] -- Worldbruce ( talk) 15:24, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Like master and other socks, Yklop is focused mainly on Bangladeshi human geography articles, and moves lede paragraph before infobox. [15] This edit is identical to that of another sock. -- Worldbruce ( talk) 16:23, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
The usual characteristics: focus on Bangladeshi human geography articles, adds improperly sourced religion and language bar charts, and moves the lead before the infobox. [16] [17] Worldbruce ( talk) 13:36, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Again, same articles, same edits, same weird move of lead before the infobox template. DoebLoggs ( talk) 10:40, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Similar user name to recent sock Logalo. First edit was less than 3 hours after Logalo was blocked. Returned to editing Sirajganj the day after protection expired. Characteristically placed infobox after lead in this edit.
The IP edits are interspersed among Logalo's. 103.230.107.59 in this edit made a similar change of phrasing as in this edit by sockpuppet John3478. 103.230.107.59's is similar to puppetmaster's improperly sourced edits in that it (A) cites a self-published source of questionable reliability and then (B) invents numbers that aren't even in the source.
Please consider extending semi-protection on Sirajganj. Is it worth considering a range block as well? -- Worldbruce ( talk) 01:44, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
There is no subtlety to their choice of name, their movement of the lead before the infobox, [18] or their focus on Bangladeshi human geography articles, particularly those connected to Sirajganj. [19] Worldbruce ( talk) 15:19, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Same edits and behaviour of previous socks, usual habit of moving lead before infobox. DoebLoggs ( talk) 11:57, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Same old story, same old song and dance. [20] Worldbruce ( talk) 06:36, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
In 26 edits has vandalized 26 articles. All but 6 of them were also vandalized by Sauraved or one or more of their socks, to wit 24c.56.43c, John3478, Logalo, Loganimo, and Uzbuk. The high degree of overlap is too much of a coincidence for Rabinhoodo to be anything but a sock of Sauraved. Worldbruce ( talk) 05:34, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Currently blocked by Alexf for vandalism, but for only 3 days. Similar name to master and earlier sock Sauravme. Same focus on Bangladeshi human geography articles, particularly those connected to Sirajganj (Belkuchi Upazila, Kamarkhanda Upazila, Kazipur Upazila, and Raiganj Upazila are all sub districts of Sirajganj District). Began editing hours after sock Rabinhoodo's edits were detected and reverted. Worldbruce ( talk) 13:49, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Rjyok already blocked by Deepfriedokra for persistent removal of content, but for only 72 hours. The suspects have the usual focus on Bangladeshi human geography articles, particularly related to Sirajganj ( Kazipur Upazila, Kamarkhanda Upazila, Belkuchi Upazila, and Raiganj Upazila are all sub-districts of Sirajganj District.) Adding poorly sourced and inaccurate statistics about religion is also characteristic [21] (actual 2011 census figures for Raiganj Upazila are 89% Muslim, 11% Hindu, with no mention of Sarnas, pretty much in line with the country as a whole). Worldbruce ( talk) 16:44, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Began editing 15 April 2022, two days after similarly named sock Wigalo was blocked. First six edits were to the upazilas (sub-districts) of Sirajganj District. Shows same interest as master and prior socks in Bangladeshi human geography articles, and particularly in religious percentages. After becoming autoconfirmed, began editing Sirajganj and Sirajganj District (which are protected because of the disruption by prior socks). Worldbruce ( talk) 15:24, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Other than being six letters, their recent usernames read like a poor series of Wordle guesses: Wigamo, Wigalo, Wugomo. They are focused on editing the same set of articles. To go with the edit summary "Removed ridiculous information", they make ridiculous edits like this, changing a number by one one-hundredth of a percent. Worldbruce ( talk) 04:08, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
The latest sock making a hash of Bangladeshi human geography articles, especially the upazilas of Sirajganj District. Arjayay has already taken them up the disruptive editing ladder to a final warning, but they have not actually been blocked yet. Worldbruce ( talk) 17:12, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Same behaviour as previous socks targeting some of the already targeted articles, restoring last sock (Hokpin) reverted edits. See here for example:
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Belkuchi_Upazila&action=history
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Kazipur_Upazila&action=history DoebLoggs ( talk) 10:56, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Both of these accounts are removing the same portion of content from the same article ( Kazipur Upazila, see article's revision history), that is the same portion also removed by other socks from the same sockfarm in the past ( Kinhox ( talk · contribs), Xalah ( talk · contribs), etc.)
Pucicom's edits at Rajshahi Division also looks similar to Bhubanb ( talk · contribs)'s past edits on the same page. Please, compare [22] to [23] (the pie chart in particular, same data, same colors, etc.) DoebLoggs ( talk) 10:46, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
All of them mainly edit on the same articles, all of them move the lead before the infobox template even after being recommended not to do so. DoebLoggs ( talk) 10:55, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Username is structurally similar to socks blocked earlier today. Main focus is on Sirajganj and Sirajganj District, like master and socks. Exhibits same quirk of moving lead before infobox. Continued attempts at socking seem inevitable, so strongly urge semi-protection or extended confirmed protection of Sirajganj and Sirajganj District as additional protection against disruption. -- Worldbruce ( talk) 17:13, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Same behaviour as above, same articles, same move of lede before the infobox template. DoebLoggs ( talk) 08:03, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Another loud quacking duck, same articles, same behaviour. DoebLoggs ( talk) 09:52, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Sixth sock in the past 48 hours focused on Sirajganj and Sirajganj District, places in Bangladesh of no great significance to most Bangladeshis. The articles have been on Wikipedia for 17 years. 65-75% of the edits to them have been in the past six weeks by Sauraved and their socks.
As has been noted before, they have a singular habit of moving the lead to before the infobox. [3] They also add language claiming the places are important, unsupported by sources. [4] [5] Another characteristic behaviour is adding religion and language bar charts and then fiddling endlessly with the 4th significant digit of religious percentages. [6] [7] [8] -- Worldbruce ( talk) 07:02, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
;)
--
Tamzin
cetacean needed (she/they)
01:46, 10 February 2022 (UTC)The unimaginatively named sock of the day is disrupting articles about upazilas (sub-districts) of Sirajganj District now that it and Sirajganj are protected. Example: [9] -- Worldbruce ( talk) 00:45, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Same style username as past socks. Same addition of religion bar charts to Bangladeshi district articles, without sufficiently defining a source to make the content verifiable. [10] Worldbruce ( talk) 06:30, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I've added a second account, one that started editing within 30 minutes of the first being blocked. Their first edit was to undo 24c.56.43c's addition of an improperly sourced religion bar to Bogra District. [11] Their next edits were to move the lead before the infobox on various Bangladeshi upazilla (sub-district) articles. [12] -- Worldbruce ( talk) 07:46, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Again, same type of edits, same weird habit to move the lead before the infobox template. See here for example: [13] DoebLoggs ( talk) 12:22, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Usual habit of moving lead before infobox on Bangladeshi political geography articles. [14] -- Worldbruce ( talk) 15:24, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Like master and other socks, Yklop is focused mainly on Bangladeshi human geography articles, and moves lede paragraph before infobox. [15] This edit is identical to that of another sock. -- Worldbruce ( talk) 16:23, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
The usual characteristics: focus on Bangladeshi human geography articles, adds improperly sourced religion and language bar charts, and moves the lead before the infobox. [16] [17] Worldbruce ( talk) 13:36, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Again, same articles, same edits, same weird move of lead before the infobox template. DoebLoggs ( talk) 10:40, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Similar user name to recent sock Logalo. First edit was less than 3 hours after Logalo was blocked. Returned to editing Sirajganj the day after protection expired. Characteristically placed infobox after lead in this edit.
The IP edits are interspersed among Logalo's. 103.230.107.59 in this edit made a similar change of phrasing as in this edit by sockpuppet John3478. 103.230.107.59's is similar to puppetmaster's improperly sourced edits in that it (A) cites a self-published source of questionable reliability and then (B) invents numbers that aren't even in the source.
Please consider extending semi-protection on Sirajganj. Is it worth considering a range block as well? -- Worldbruce ( talk) 01:44, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
There is no subtlety to their choice of name, their movement of the lead before the infobox, [18] or their focus on Bangladeshi human geography articles, particularly those connected to Sirajganj. [19] Worldbruce ( talk) 15:19, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Same edits and behaviour of previous socks, usual habit of moving lead before infobox. DoebLoggs ( talk) 11:57, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Same old story, same old song and dance. [20] Worldbruce ( talk) 06:36, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
In 26 edits has vandalized 26 articles. All but 6 of them were also vandalized by Sauraved or one or more of their socks, to wit 24c.56.43c, John3478, Logalo, Loganimo, and Uzbuk. The high degree of overlap is too much of a coincidence for Rabinhoodo to be anything but a sock of Sauraved. Worldbruce ( talk) 05:34, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Currently blocked by Alexf for vandalism, but for only 3 days. Similar name to master and earlier sock Sauravme. Same focus on Bangladeshi human geography articles, particularly those connected to Sirajganj (Belkuchi Upazila, Kamarkhanda Upazila, Kazipur Upazila, and Raiganj Upazila are all sub districts of Sirajganj District). Began editing hours after sock Rabinhoodo's edits were detected and reverted. Worldbruce ( talk) 13:49, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Rjyok already blocked by Deepfriedokra for persistent removal of content, but for only 72 hours. The suspects have the usual focus on Bangladeshi human geography articles, particularly related to Sirajganj ( Kazipur Upazila, Kamarkhanda Upazila, Belkuchi Upazila, and Raiganj Upazila are all sub-districts of Sirajganj District.) Adding poorly sourced and inaccurate statistics about religion is also characteristic [21] (actual 2011 census figures for Raiganj Upazila are 89% Muslim, 11% Hindu, with no mention of Sarnas, pretty much in line with the country as a whole). Worldbruce ( talk) 16:44, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Began editing 15 April 2022, two days after similarly named sock Wigalo was blocked. First six edits were to the upazilas (sub-districts) of Sirajganj District. Shows same interest as master and prior socks in Bangladeshi human geography articles, and particularly in religious percentages. After becoming autoconfirmed, began editing Sirajganj and Sirajganj District (which are protected because of the disruption by prior socks). Worldbruce ( talk) 15:24, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Other than being six letters, their recent usernames read like a poor series of Wordle guesses: Wigamo, Wigalo, Wugomo. They are focused on editing the same set of articles. To go with the edit summary "Removed ridiculous information", they make ridiculous edits like this, changing a number by one one-hundredth of a percent. Worldbruce ( talk) 04:08, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
The latest sock making a hash of Bangladeshi human geography articles, especially the upazilas of Sirajganj District. Arjayay has already taken them up the disruptive editing ladder to a final warning, but they have not actually been blocked yet. Worldbruce ( talk) 17:12, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Same behaviour as previous socks targeting some of the already targeted articles, restoring last sock (Hokpin) reverted edits. See here for example:
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Belkuchi_Upazila&action=history
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Kazipur_Upazila&action=history DoebLoggs ( talk) 10:56, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Both of these accounts are removing the same portion of content from the same article ( Kazipur Upazila, see article's revision history), that is the same portion also removed by other socks from the same sockfarm in the past ( Kinhox ( talk · contribs), Xalah ( talk · contribs), etc.)
Pucicom's edits at Rajshahi Division also looks similar to Bhubanb ( talk · contribs)'s past edits on the same page. Please, compare [22] to [23] (the pie chart in particular, same data, same colors, etc.) DoebLoggs ( talk) 10:46, 28 September 2022 (UTC)