After a two month absence, Samsungx635 returns to delete a discussion they participated on Talk:One Piece and had attempted to previously delete. [1] [2] [3] [4] After Marlin Setia1 reverted the blanking of the discussion and the entire talk page, User789312 immediately creates an account and deletes the discussion again. [5] Now the third account, User320259 asks that the discussion be removed [6] and contacts 1989 to remove the discussion along with another discussion that Samsungx635 participated in on 1989's talk page. [7]. All three of these accounts are obviously the same person. — Farix ( t | c) 23:54, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
same edits Theroadislong ( talk) 17:45, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
recent sock versus this account. Same talk page, same demands ("do this asap" and "change the profile picture into first volume cover.") bonadea contributions talk 16:45, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
More quacking to request title change for Case Closed [10] and the urgent request to make One Piece an FA [11], same behavior as previous socks, just not the volume 1 cover, which would sure to be one of his agenda items on making it FA. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 21:26, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
more quacking on wanting to change the Case Closed title to Detective Conan. Was banned previously for the same thing plus the Volume 1 One Piece AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 16:01, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Quacking again about volume 1 covers for One Piece and renaming Detective Conan to Case Closed. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 15:18, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
This case is being reviewed by Cabayi as part of the clerk training process. Please allow Cabayi to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on Cabayi's Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.
The IP was blocked as a sock shortly after the SPI was raised. Closing. Cabayi ( talk) 16:07, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
More quacking about Case Closed and One Piece volume 1 covers, "I'm not here to request anything anymore" implying they were here to do that before. Doesn't want to look in the Archives for the reasons. AngusW🐶🐶F ( bark • sniff) 14:39, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
After a two month absence, Samsungx635 returns to delete a discussion they participated on Talk:One Piece and had attempted to previously delete. [1] [2] [3] [4] After Marlin Setia1 reverted the blanking of the discussion and the entire talk page, User789312 immediately creates an account and deletes the discussion again. [5] Now the third account, User320259 asks that the discussion be removed [6] and contacts 1989 to remove the discussion along with another discussion that Samsungx635 participated in on 1989's talk page. [7]. All three of these accounts are obviously the same person. — Farix ( t | c) 23:54, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
same edits Theroadislong ( talk) 17:45, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
recent sock versus this account. Same talk page, same demands ("do this asap" and "change the profile picture into first volume cover.") bonadea contributions talk 16:45, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
More quacking to request title change for Case Closed [10] and the urgent request to make One Piece an FA [11], same behavior as previous socks, just not the volume 1 cover, which would sure to be one of his agenda items on making it FA. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 21:26, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
more quacking on wanting to change the Case Closed title to Detective Conan. Was banned previously for the same thing plus the Volume 1 One Piece AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 16:01, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Quacking again about volume 1 covers for One Piece and renaming Detective Conan to Case Closed. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 15:18, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
This case is being reviewed by Cabayi as part of the clerk training process. Please allow Cabayi to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on Cabayi's Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.
The IP was blocked as a sock shortly after the SPI was raised. Closing. Cabayi ( talk) 16:07, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
More quacking about Case Closed and One Piece volume 1 covers, "I'm not here to request anything anymore" implying they were here to do that before. Doesn't want to look in the Archives for the reasons. AngusW🐶🐶F ( bark • sniff) 14:39, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.