From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Samsungx635

Samsungx635 ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)

22 September 2017

Suspected sockpuppets


After a two month absence, Samsungx635 returns to delete a discussion they participated on Talk:One Piece and had attempted to previously delete. [1] [2] [3] [4] After Marlin Setia1 reverted the blanking of the discussion and the entire talk page, User789312 immediately creates an account and deletes the discussion again. [5] Now the third account, User320259 asks that the discussion be removed [6] and contacts 1989 to remove the discussion along with another discussion that Samsungx635 participated in on 1989's talk page. [7]. All three of these accounts are obviously the same person. — Farix ( t |  c) 23:54, 22 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


30 October 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

same edits Theroadislong ( talk) 17:45, 30 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


22 January 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

recent sock versus this account. Same talk page, same demands ("do this asap" and "change the profile picture into first volume cover.") bonadea contributions talk 16:45, 22 January 2019 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


11 February 2019

Suspected sockpuppets


More quacking to request title change for Case Closed [10] and the urgent request to make One Piece an FA [11], same behavior as previous socks, just not the volume 1 cover, which would sure to be one of his agenda items on making it FA. AngusWOOF ( barksniff) 21:26, 11 February 2019 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Accused sock puppet account has been indef'd and tagged, based on the user's similar edits and requests made to Talk:Case Closed and Talk:Mirtha Legrand compared to other previously-blocked sock puppets of Samsungx635. This SPI report can be closed... ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 22:34, 11 February 2019 (UTC) reply

08 March 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

more quacking on wanting to change the Case Closed title to Detective Conan. Was banned previously for the same thing plus the Volume 1 One Piece AngusWOOF ( barksniff) 16:01, 8 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


12 March 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

Quacking again about volume 1 covers for One Piece and renaming Detective Conan to Case Closed. AngusWOOF ( barksniff) 15:18, 12 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This case is being reviewed by Cabayi as part of the clerk training process. Please allow Cabayi to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on Cabayi's Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.

The IP was blocked as a sock shortly after the SPI was raised. Closing. Cabayi ( talk) 16:07, 12 March 2019 (UTC) reply


14 April 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

More quacking about Case Closed and One Piece volume 1 covers, "I'm not here to request anything anymore" implying they were here to do that before. Doesn't want to look in the Archives for the reasons. AngusW🐶🐶F ( barksniff) 14:39, 14 April 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Samsungx635

Samsungx635 ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)

22 September 2017

Suspected sockpuppets


After a two month absence, Samsungx635 returns to delete a discussion they participated on Talk:One Piece and had attempted to previously delete. [1] [2] [3] [4] After Marlin Setia1 reverted the blanking of the discussion and the entire talk page, User789312 immediately creates an account and deletes the discussion again. [5] Now the third account, User320259 asks that the discussion be removed [6] and contacts 1989 to remove the discussion along with another discussion that Samsungx635 participated in on 1989's talk page. [7]. All three of these accounts are obviously the same person. — Farix ( t |  c) 23:54, 22 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


30 October 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

same edits Theroadislong ( talk) 17:45, 30 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


22 January 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

recent sock versus this account. Same talk page, same demands ("do this asap" and "change the profile picture into first volume cover.") bonadea contributions talk 16:45, 22 January 2019 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


11 February 2019

Suspected sockpuppets


More quacking to request title change for Case Closed [10] and the urgent request to make One Piece an FA [11], same behavior as previous socks, just not the volume 1 cover, which would sure to be one of his agenda items on making it FA. AngusWOOF ( barksniff) 21:26, 11 February 2019 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Accused sock puppet account has been indef'd and tagged, based on the user's similar edits and requests made to Talk:Case Closed and Talk:Mirtha Legrand compared to other previously-blocked sock puppets of Samsungx635. This SPI report can be closed... ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 22:34, 11 February 2019 (UTC) reply

08 March 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

more quacking on wanting to change the Case Closed title to Detective Conan. Was banned previously for the same thing plus the Volume 1 One Piece AngusWOOF ( barksniff) 16:01, 8 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


12 March 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

Quacking again about volume 1 covers for One Piece and renaming Detective Conan to Case Closed. AngusWOOF ( barksniff) 15:18, 12 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This case is being reviewed by Cabayi as part of the clerk training process. Please allow Cabayi to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on Cabayi's Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.

The IP was blocked as a sock shortly after the SPI was raised. Closing. Cabayi ( talk) 16:07, 12 March 2019 (UTC) reply


14 April 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

More quacking about Case Closed and One Piece volume 1 covers, "I'm not here to request anything anymore" implying they were here to do that before. Doesn't want to look in the Archives for the reasons. AngusW🐶🐶F ( barksniff) 14:39, 14 April 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments



Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook