Russ.lienart (
talk·contribs) -- At article, Knight and Day, repeated pattern of disruption, including removal of sourced info in violation of
WP:LEADCITE[1], and again at
[2], and addition of unsourced and poorly sourced info,
[3], combined with complete refusal to participate in talk page discussions
[4].
76.173.185.174 (
talk·contribs) -- At same article as above, Knight and Day, same exact pattern shared with master sock account, of adding poorly sourced info
[5], combined with zero participation in talk page discussion
[6].
Note: Use of IP, combined with above-listed account (possibly other IPs/accounts have been used as well) in order to continue disruption at the page, obfuscate, and continue addition of poorly sourced info, removal of sourced info, and refusal to participate in talk page discussion. -- Cirt (
talk) 05:53, 20 August 2010 (UTC) -- Cirt (
talk)
05:53, 20 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Nod, understood,
no worries. Thank you for the attention to this matter, regardless. Would still request admin investigation with regard to above-presented evidence. -- Cirt (
talk)
02:46, 29 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Russ.lienart (
talk·contribs) -- At article, Knight and Day, repeated pattern of disruption, including removal of sourced info in violation of
WP:LEADCITE[1], and again at
[2], and addition of unsourced and poorly sourced info,
[3], combined with complete refusal to participate in talk page discussions
[4].
76.173.185.174 (
talk·contribs) -- At same article as above, Knight and Day, same exact pattern shared with master sock account, of adding poorly sourced info
[5], combined with zero participation in talk page discussion
[6].
Note: Use of IP, combined with above-listed account (possibly other IPs/accounts have been used as well) in order to continue disruption at the page, obfuscate, and continue addition of poorly sourced info, removal of sourced info, and refusal to participate in talk page discussion. -- Cirt (
talk) 05:53, 20 August 2010 (UTC) -- Cirt (
talk)
05:53, 20 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Nod, understood,
no worries. Thank you for the attention to this matter, regardless. Would still request admin investigation with regard to above-presented evidence. -- Cirt (
talk)
02:46, 29 August 2010 (UTC)reply