Since User:Ronald Wenonah has been Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive647#User:Ronald Wenonah and edits to War of 1812 warned about disruptive editing to the article War of 1812, a number of different comments have been left on the talk page by the above either making one edit supporting WP's POV or simply making one edit to the article talk page and no other edits. Seems like a DUCK to me. PBS ( talk) 21:14, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
Voucherman forgot to sign the edit and it was bot generated as 109.175.173.95 before Voucherman signed, as Voucherman has a small edit history and was using an address in the UK this may just be a coincidence, that (s)he made similar comments to the other accounts. -- PBS ( talk)
Auto-generated every six hours.
See Defending yourself against claims.
Completely
Unrelated based on technical evidence.
–
MuZemike
00:44, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Obviously this is the same editor based on similarity of name and edits. Ronald Wenonah has previously notified of an SPI, [1] so should be aware of the rules of using multiple accounts. While the new account was not created for purposes of block or 3rr evasion, he should follow procedures in Wikipedia:Changing username or change his signature. Note that the original account has a block history which does not appear under the new account. TFD ( talk) 20:17, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I would let this issue go. Firstly, Rwenonah ( talk) explained on my talk page that he forgot his password. Also, the name is so close to that originally used ( Ronald Wenonah) that the new name is obviously not an attempt to evade scrutiny. HLGallon ( talk) 20:46, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
I concur with HLGallon. There is no overlap in editing dates and a forgotten password is a plausible excuse. I think it would be good for Rwenonah to mark the previous account as his, however. Unless there's more, I'll mark for close soon. TN X Man 17:21, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
Since User:Ronald Wenonah has been Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive647#User:Ronald Wenonah and edits to War of 1812 warned about disruptive editing to the article War of 1812, a number of different comments have been left on the talk page by the above either making one edit supporting WP's POV or simply making one edit to the article talk page and no other edits. Seems like a DUCK to me. PBS ( talk) 21:14, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
Voucherman forgot to sign the edit and it was bot generated as 109.175.173.95 before Voucherman signed, as Voucherman has a small edit history and was using an address in the UK this may just be a coincidence, that (s)he made similar comments to the other accounts. -- PBS ( talk)
Auto-generated every six hours.
See Defending yourself against claims.
Completely
Unrelated based on technical evidence.
–
MuZemike
00:44, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Obviously this is the same editor based on similarity of name and edits. Ronald Wenonah has previously notified of an SPI, [1] so should be aware of the rules of using multiple accounts. While the new account was not created for purposes of block or 3rr evasion, he should follow procedures in Wikipedia:Changing username or change his signature. Note that the original account has a block history which does not appear under the new account. TFD ( talk) 20:17, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I would let this issue go. Firstly, Rwenonah ( talk) explained on my talk page that he forgot his password. Also, the name is so close to that originally used ( Ronald Wenonah) that the new name is obviously not an attempt to evade scrutiny. HLGallon ( talk) 20:46, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
I concur with HLGallon. There is no overlap in editing dates and a forgotten password is a plausible excuse. I think it would be good for Rwenonah to mark the previous account as his, however. Unless there's more, I'll mark for close soon. TN X Man 17:21, 9 January 2012 (UTC)