Qpmx10084 ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• Fleurplan ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• MMNJ ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Long term vandalism and unsourced edits at Alan Dubin. Suspect user is running other socks to vandalize other articles. Petri Krohn ( talk) 01:39, 11 October 2010 (UTC) reply

Alan Dubin On this article all these users are making the same basic edits. The Qpmx10084 is already blocked as a vandalism only account. The other two seem intent on adding unsourced fanboy stuff to the article, nothing bad, just bigging the BLP up. mark 07:32, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

See Defending yourself against claims.

•  Note:: Case moved to correct sock master. Tiptoety ^talk 16:47, 12 October 2010 (UTC) reply
• Qpmx10084 ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki) is  Stale;
• The other two are  Confirmed. Tiptoety ^talk 16:54, 12 October 2010 (UTC) reply
•  Administrator note I indef blocked Fleurplan, and left MMNJ a warning about sockpuppeting. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 23:08, 12 October 2010 (UTC) reply

Suspected sockpuppets

• Chewjewlick ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Several months ago, a report was submitted concerning several different accounts adding unsourced information to the article Alan Dubin. One account (Fleurplan) was blocked and another (MMNJ) was warned about using sockpuppets. Recently, I'm starting to see the same behavior cropping up again. A new account exhibiting very similar behavior (new account, no edits to other articles, adding trivia/potential vandalism, returning the edit when it is undone for no source, not using edit summaries or attempting to talk to other editors) has edited the article and I have a strong feeling it's the same user. I appreciate any help you can give. Rnb ( talk) 04:33, 13 January 2011 (UTC) reply

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

 Clerk declined Suspected sockmaster is  Stale. Will have to be addressed using behavioral evidence alone. -- Shirik ( Questions or Comments?) 04:44, 13 January 2011 (UTC) reply

•  Administrator note Based on behavioral evidence, I've blocked and tagged the sock. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 17:46, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply

Suspected sockpuppets

• BnR2000 ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Zimbabweking ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

History of adding hoax content to Alan Dubin January ^(talk) 23:04, 18 January 2011 (UTC) reply

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

•  Administrator note Both accounts blocked and tagged per WP:DUCK. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 00:19, 19 January 2011 (UTC) reply