Qmbv ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

01 August 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

• Nevlos ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

• Identical edits at Margaret of Nevers: [1] [2] (using the master account to revert a revert of the puppet's contribution by User:Kansas Bear)
• Overlap of interests is too extensive to be coincidental: [3] [4] Celia Homeford ( talk) 10:15, 1 August 2018 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Technically indistinguishable, blocked, tagged, closing.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 22:22, 1 August 2018 (UTC) reply

29 August 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

• 2shill ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Frac6 ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Montarg ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

2shill was created a few days after the last sock puppet Nevlos ( talk · contribs) was blocked and carried on editing the same content: Henry VI [5] [6], Henry V [7] [8], Philip II [9] [10]. Celia Homeford ( talk) 13:00, 29 August 2018 (UTC) reply

Frac6 was created two days ago and has jumped in to the same exact topic area: King John [11] [12] [13], Henry V [14].

Montarg is another new account that has jumped into the same topic area with the same style of edits.

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

•  Confirmed plus:
  • 6071m ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • 1911l41 ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
•  Blocked and tagged. Closing.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 13:55, 10 October 2018 (UTC) reply

10 December 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

• La8at ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Same topic focus as the previous accounts: Nevlos and Qmbv [15], Montarg [16] [17], 6071m and 2shill [18]. Celia Homeford ( talk) 11:15, 10 December 2018 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Confirmed,  Blocked and tagged.
 —  Berean Hunter (talk) 13:37, 10 December 2018 (UTC) reply

11 January 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

• 1cesc ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Same topic focus as previous sock puppets: 1cesc, Nevlos -- 1cesc, 6071m -- 1cesc, Montarg, 2shill, Nevlos -- 1cesc, Montarg. Celia Homeford ( talk) 09:55, 11 January 2019 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

• CheckUser requested and endorsed by clerk - The behaviour here is fairly generic, and therefore largely inconclusive, but the name and choice of subject matter is enough to warrant a check in my opinion. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 20:10, 12 January 2019 (UTC) reply
•  Confirmed, along with Argent11. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 02:35, 13 January 2019 (UTC) reply

08 February 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

• 1asher2 ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Compare with known sock puppet 2shill ( talk · contribs): once again the same topic focus and same focus on moving medieval nobility articles. Celia Homeford ( talk) 12:10, 8 February 2019 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

•  Confirmed to those in the archive.  Blocked and tagged.
   —  Berean Hunter (talk) 20:12, 10 February 2019 (UTC) reply
• Mark closed. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 03:58, 14 February 2019 (UTC) reply

01 April 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

• Bogman10 ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

General contribs, but specifically the usual insertion of factoids into medieval English history articles and other discriminate information. Cheers! —— SerialNumber 54129 12:31, 1 April 2019 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

• This case is being reviewed by Cabayi as part of the clerk training process. Please allow Cabayi to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on Cabayi's Talk page or on this page if more appropriate. Cabayi ( talk) 14:06, 1 April 2019 (UTC) reply
• CheckUser requested and endorsed by clerk - I can only repeat SirSputnik's comment on an earlier case in this stable: The behaviour here is fairly generic, and therefore largely inconclusive, but the name and choice of subject matter is enough to warrant a check in my opinion. Cabayi ( talk) 14:09, 1 April 2019 (UTC) reply
•  Confirmed plus Tshtf ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki). — DoRD ( talk)​ 16:28, 1 April 2019 (UTC) reply
•  Awaiting administrative action - Please indef the socks. Cabayi ( talk) 17:07, 1 April 2019 (UTC) reply
•  Blocked and tagged. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 00:37, 2 April 2019 (UTC) reply