Personperson1234567
- Personperson1234567 ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Report date December 5 2009, 02:55 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets
- CoolioDroolio ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- ReversePorkies ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Evidence submitted by SlamDiego
- Edits by Personperson1234567
- Edits by CoolioDroolio
- Edits from 70.162.21.165
- Edits by ReversePorkies
- ReversePorkies claims to be a friend of Personperson1234567.
Note that these are single-purpose accounts and that ReversePorkies essentially restored the most recent version from Personperson1234567 in the context of Personperson1234567 being blocked. — SlamDiego ←T 02:55, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users
CheckUser requests
- Checkuser request – code letter: B (Ongoing serious pattern vandalism )
- Current status –
Declined, the reason can be found below. Requested by
SlamDiego
←T
02:55, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
With block evasion. — SlamDiego ←T 03:19, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Clerk declined – clear behavioral evidence indicates socking. No CU necessary.
MuZemike
18:58, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Conclusions
Administrator note All registered accounts indefinitely blocked and tagged (i.e. those who already had a temporary block have been extended to indefinite). This quacks more as socking than meatpuppetry in my opinion.
MuZemike
19:12, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
|
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
Personperson1234567
- Personperson1234567 ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Report date December 5 2009, 02:55 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets
- CoolioDroolio ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- ReversePorkies ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Evidence submitted by SlamDiego
- Edits by Personperson1234567
- Edits by CoolioDroolio
- Edits from 70.162.21.165
- Edits by ReversePorkies
- ReversePorkies claims to be a friend of Personperson1234567.
Note that these are single-purpose accounts and that ReversePorkies essentially restored the most recent version from Personperson1234567 in the context of Personperson1234567 being blocked. — SlamDiego ←T 02:55, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users
CheckUser requests
- Checkuser request – code letter: B (Ongoing serious pattern vandalism )
- Current status –
Declined, the reason can be found below. Requested by
SlamDiego
←T
02:55, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
With block evasion. — SlamDiego ←T 03:19, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Clerk declined – clear behavioral evidence indicates socking. No CU necessary.
MuZemike
18:58, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Conclusions
Administrator note All registered accounts indefinitely blocked and tagged (i.e. those who already had a temporary block have been extended to indefinite). This quacks more as socking than meatpuppetry in my opinion.
MuZemike
19:12, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
|
|
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |