PODs Watch ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Report date September 28 2009, 09:11 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

• Fluffy Bunny loves NLR ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• 86.139.142.44 ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser ( log))
• 82.132.139.133 ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser ( log))
• 86.139.84.237 ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser ( log))

Evidence submitted by — SpaceFlight89

PODs Watch ( talk · contribs) is a single-purpose account created to "protect Wikipedia from blatent[sic] spamming by PODs company staff" involved in disruptive editing on PODS (company) related files and harassing Twalters82 ( talk · contribs). Similar behavior is shown by 86.139.142.44, 82.132.139.133, 86.139.84.237 (nominating PODS files for deletion or participating in those discussions [1] [2] [3] [4]). Both the IPs geolocate to London. Twalters82 claims to not have a COI, but even if they have a COI, they should not be harassed for it [5]. Using multiple accounts to edit like this and to participate in same deletion discussions is a violation of the sockpuppetry policy, and in my opinion these two accounts (PODs watch, Fluffy Bunny) should be blocked for their edits alone, even if the CheckUser comes out negative. — SpaceFlight89 09:11, 28 September 2009 (UTC) reply

Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users

CheckUser requests

Checkuser request – code letter: F (Other reason )

Current status – Declined, the reason can be found below.    Requested by — SpaceFlight89 09:11, 28 September 2009 (UTC) reply

 Clerk declined obvious cases can be handled without CU Mayalld ( talk) 14:47, 28 September 2009 (UTC) reply

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Conclusions

 Administrator note User:Fluffy Bunny loves NLR blocked indefinitely, User:PODs Watch blocked for 2 weeks for disruption and sock puppetry. I am leaving the IP addresses alone as they have not edited in a while. Rangeblocks are out of the question; the one /16 range is too busy to place a block. MuZemike 19:13, 29 September 2009 (UTC) reply

This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.