Prior SSP or RFCU cases may exist for this user:
Clerk endorsed on the basis that I think a technical check is needed to further show a link between Ducatista2 and Luigi 28, as both accounts have reverted edits and has had interactions with DIREKTOR.
MuZemike
17:52, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
User:PIO is banned and a multiple sockpuppeteer. The newly appeared User:Pantaleone is as blatant a PIO sock as you could wish (not) to meet. The user page is the same style as confirmed sock Ciolone [2], proclaiming the user to be a non-Italian Italian. Going straight into battle [3] against various long established editors on behalf of various of his own confirmed socks is another giveaway. For those who don't speak Italian, the message to User:Il Palazzo talks about the problem of users from Croatia who oppose Italian users and Serbs on many articles relating to Istria and Dalmatia, who round up complicit administrators who then ban users who are not sockpuppets such as User: Luigi 28, User:Barba Nane, User: Ducatista2, User: Trusciante, User: MacLot, User: Miranovic and others. It accuses User:DIREKTOR of being extremely POV and anti-Italian and asks Il Palazzo to start an SPI case against DIREKTOR and others as socks of User: No.13. PIO is fond of accusing us of being socks of No.13 [4] [5]. If any further evidence were needed, Pantaleone loves the article on Pallone [6], as did (scroll down) PIO and his sock Jxy. AlasdairGreen27 ( talk) 15:36, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk declined – behavioral evidence clearly indicates that this is PIO. No CU necessary.
MuZemike
20:44, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
Clerk note: Tagged as a blocked sock. Already blocked.
MuZemike
20:44, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
User:PIO is a banned multiple sockpuppeteer [7]. User:Vastaso is his latest blatantly obvious incarnation. With the account registered just two days [8] after User:Pantaleone was blocked [ [9]], it went straight to PIO's article on Pallone [10], and by its fourth edit was calling me a "notorious psyko vandal" [11] and by the sixth edit was at the talk page of the (presumably unrelated and thus bemused) new user HK-90 urging him her to start an ANI report against me [12]. Begone. AlasdairGreen27 ( talk) 12:51, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
See Defending yourself against claims.
Administrator note Obvious sock. Vastaso blocked.
Spellcast (
talk)
18:35, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Clerk note: Sock tagged. Next time, remember to tag the socks before marking as closed.
MuZemike
20:37, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
This case has been marked as closed. It will be archived after its final review by a Clerk or Checkuser. |
Prior SSP or RFCU cases may exist for this user:
Clerk endorsed on the basis that I think a technical check is needed to further show a link between Ducatista2 and Luigi 28, as both accounts have reverted edits and has had interactions with DIREKTOR.
MuZemike
17:52, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
User:PIO is banned and a multiple sockpuppeteer. The newly appeared User:Pantaleone is as blatant a PIO sock as you could wish (not) to meet. The user page is the same style as confirmed sock Ciolone [2], proclaiming the user to be a non-Italian Italian. Going straight into battle [3] against various long established editors on behalf of various of his own confirmed socks is another giveaway. For those who don't speak Italian, the message to User:Il Palazzo talks about the problem of users from Croatia who oppose Italian users and Serbs on many articles relating to Istria and Dalmatia, who round up complicit administrators who then ban users who are not sockpuppets such as User: Luigi 28, User:Barba Nane, User: Ducatista2, User: Trusciante, User: MacLot, User: Miranovic and others. It accuses User:DIREKTOR of being extremely POV and anti-Italian and asks Il Palazzo to start an SPI case against DIREKTOR and others as socks of User: No.13. PIO is fond of accusing us of being socks of No.13 [4] [5]. If any further evidence were needed, Pantaleone loves the article on Pallone [6], as did (scroll down) PIO and his sock Jxy. AlasdairGreen27 ( talk) 15:36, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk declined – behavioral evidence clearly indicates that this is PIO. No CU necessary.
MuZemike
20:44, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
Clerk note: Tagged as a blocked sock. Already blocked.
MuZemike
20:44, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
User:PIO is a banned multiple sockpuppeteer [7]. User:Vastaso is his latest blatantly obvious incarnation. With the account registered just two days [8] after User:Pantaleone was blocked [ [9]], it went straight to PIO's article on Pallone [10], and by its fourth edit was calling me a "notorious psyko vandal" [11] and by the sixth edit was at the talk page of the (presumably unrelated and thus bemused) new user HK-90 urging him her to start an ANI report against me [12]. Begone. AlasdairGreen27 ( talk) 12:51, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
See Defending yourself against claims.
Administrator note Obvious sock. Vastaso blocked.
Spellcast (
talk)
18:35, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Clerk note: Sock tagged. Next time, remember to tag the socks before marking as closed.
MuZemike
20:37, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
This case has been marked as closed. It will be archived after its final review by a Clerk or Checkuser. |