OberRanks
- OberRanks ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- 2600:387:3:805:0:0:0:67 ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
2600:387:3:805:0:0:0:67 recently chimed in at Talk:Lion Guard, making the same evidence-free COI accusation that OberRanks has been making (example here), and perhaps trying to gain an upper hand in the discussion. Geolocates to Baltimore, Maryland. OberRanks has made multiple comments referring to an off-wiki connection to Maryland (specifically, having communicated directly with the Maryland Republican Party, which has nothing to do with the subject of the article, examples here, here). The geographical nexus could be a coincidence but it would be a very odd one indeed. FYI Husnock is a legitimate alternate (retired) account of OberRanks. -- Dr. Fleischman ( talk) 18:39, 18 October 2017 (UTC) Dr. Fleischman ( talk) 18:39, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Sorry guys, I have no idea who this account is or any other information. I've actually completely withdrawn from the article [1] as the editing was getting very aggressive and the the talk page posts were getting a bit too nasty as well as threats left on my talk page that I was being "disruptive" [2]. I kind of wonder if this SPI is an attempt to "keep the fight alive" as all this appears to be is another person commenting on the article. Not surprising, as I've posted the matter on several noticeboards. [3] [4] - O.R. Comms 01:24, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
-
Clerk declined - We cannot use CU to connect named accounts and IPs, so I'm declining the CU request. However, I think it's worth asking -
OberRanks, is this IP you or anyone you might know?
GAB
gab
23:16, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
This case is being reviewed by Sro23 as part of the clerk training process. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on their Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.
- OberRanks' explanation seems reasonable. Closing with no action. Sro23 ( talk) 15:59, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
OberRanks
- OberRanks ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- 2600:387:3:805:0:0:0:67 ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
2600:387:3:805:0:0:0:67 recently chimed in at Talk:Lion Guard, making the same evidence-free COI accusation that OberRanks has been making (example here), and perhaps trying to gain an upper hand in the discussion. Geolocates to Baltimore, Maryland. OberRanks has made multiple comments referring to an off-wiki connection to Maryland (specifically, having communicated directly with the Maryland Republican Party, which has nothing to do with the subject of the article, examples here, here). The geographical nexus could be a coincidence but it would be a very odd one indeed. FYI Husnock is a legitimate alternate (retired) account of OberRanks. -- Dr. Fleischman ( talk) 18:39, 18 October 2017 (UTC) Dr. Fleischman ( talk) 18:39, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Sorry guys, I have no idea who this account is or any other information. I've actually completely withdrawn from the article [1] as the editing was getting very aggressive and the the talk page posts were getting a bit too nasty as well as threats left on my talk page that I was being "disruptive" [2]. I kind of wonder if this SPI is an attempt to "keep the fight alive" as all this appears to be is another person commenting on the article. Not surprising, as I've posted the matter on several noticeboards. [3] [4] - O.R. Comms 01:24, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
-
Clerk declined - We cannot use CU to connect named accounts and IPs, so I'm declining the CU request. However, I think it's worth asking -
OberRanks, is this IP you or anyone you might know?
GAB
gab
23:16, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
This case is being reviewed by Sro23 as part of the clerk training process. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on their Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.
- OberRanks' explanation seems reasonable. Closing with no action. Sro23 ( talk) 15:59, 21 October 2017 (UTC)