Nasiryounus
- Nasiryounus ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- RayStar77 ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Omirocksthisworld ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Evidence submitted by Truefighter
- Their conversation/contribution is an evidence.
See Defending yourself against claims. The user filing the report is under suspicion for sockpuppeting themselves...however I have no issues with having this investigation, as I really have nothing to hide. Omirocksthisworld( Drop a line) 12:37, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
Lol. I think it's about time this was done, at least I won't continuously be blamed for being someone I am not. So yeah, go ahead and carry out the investigation, please. It'd resolve something at the most.-- NY7 ☆ 16:50, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
Okay, I've just a few things to say, first of all, you can check my IP and the IPs of either User:Omirocksthisworld and User:RayStar77 and see whose from where, as well as the consistency of the IPs that have been used, unlike the IPs that are different each time User:Falconkhe logs in, which was previously (two months ago at most) established that he/she uses a software to change the IP each time he logs in, hence the random IPs and random IDs of all sort and comments very similar. -- Nasir | ناصر یونس have a chat 14:16, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
Yes, I think it's only fair to check out both sides of what have been weeks-long edit wars involving several articles. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Falconkhe. Esowteric+ Talk 12:58, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
For reference, another possible sock of the "opposition" has appeared. Have started an AN/I here and also, in fairness, have mentioned Nasiryounus in that report for possible COI and in relation to the ongoing content disputes. Esowteric+ Talk 13:40, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
- I do have my suspicions about RayStar77 ( talk · contribs)...the account seemd to be created for the purpose of edit warring, and its fist edits bear that out. I would like to know if there has been any abusive puppetry on the other side of this messy dispute. — Scien tizzle 14:18, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Clerk note: cases from
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Omirocksthisworld and
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RayStar77 merged
Spitfire
Tally-ho!
The filer has been indefinitely blocked as a sock. Looking at the contribs of all three suspected socks, I cannot conclude any socking going on. This looks more like a frivolous SPI report to me. – MuZemike 02:50, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
I agree, marking as closed Spitfire Tally-ho! 08:45, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
|
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
Nasiryounus
- Nasiryounus ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- RayStar77 ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Omirocksthisworld ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Evidence submitted by Truefighter
- Their conversation/contribution is an evidence.
See Defending yourself against claims. The user filing the report is under suspicion for sockpuppeting themselves...however I have no issues with having this investigation, as I really have nothing to hide. Omirocksthisworld( Drop a line) 12:37, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
Lol. I think it's about time this was done, at least I won't continuously be blamed for being someone I am not. So yeah, go ahead and carry out the investigation, please. It'd resolve something at the most.-- NY7 ☆ 16:50, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
Okay, I've just a few things to say, first of all, you can check my IP and the IPs of either User:Omirocksthisworld and User:RayStar77 and see whose from where, as well as the consistency of the IPs that have been used, unlike the IPs that are different each time User:Falconkhe logs in, which was previously (two months ago at most) established that he/she uses a software to change the IP each time he logs in, hence the random IPs and random IDs of all sort and comments very similar. -- Nasir | ناصر یونس have a chat 14:16, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
Yes, I think it's only fair to check out both sides of what have been weeks-long edit wars involving several articles. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Falconkhe. Esowteric+ Talk 12:58, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
For reference, another possible sock of the "opposition" has appeared. Have started an AN/I here and also, in fairness, have mentioned Nasiryounus in that report for possible COI and in relation to the ongoing content disputes. Esowteric+ Talk 13:40, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
- I do have my suspicions about RayStar77 ( talk · contribs)...the account seemd to be created for the purpose of edit warring, and its fist edits bear that out. I would like to know if there has been any abusive puppetry on the other side of this messy dispute. — Scien tizzle 14:18, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Clerk note: cases from
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Omirocksthisworld and
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RayStar77 merged
Spitfire
Tally-ho!
The filer has been indefinitely blocked as a sock. Looking at the contribs of all three suspected socks, I cannot conclude any socking going on. This looks more like a frivolous SPI report to me. – MuZemike 02:50, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
I agree, marking as closed Spitfire Tally-ho! 08:45, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
|
|
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |