From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Mswari

Mswari ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)

09 January 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

Revision history of Carol Blood.

User talk:Bait30/Archives/2020 1#Mswari

User talk:Mswari

Talk:Carol Blood

I have made it clear multiple times that I am not vandalizing an article and that I am removing content on the article per specific WP policies. It seems that a single-purpose account by the name of User:SeriousPolySci2020 was created earlier today and also refers to my edits, as well as the edits of Viewmont Viking ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), as vandalism. A newly created single-purpose account parroting the same arguments as Mswari definitely makes it seem like sockpuppetry. The talk page discussions provide context for arguments I'm referring to.  Bait30  Talk? 02:52, 9 January 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Possible. After review, I would say the technical data of these users is more consistent with two people who know each other, rather than the same person, but recruiting friends to register accounts to support one's side in a dispute is still a violation of Wikipedia policy. I am going to block both Mswari and SeriousPolySci2020 indefinitely. I don't think tags are needed at this time. Mz7 ( talk) 07:27, 9 January 2020 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Mswari

Mswari ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)

09 January 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

Revision history of Carol Blood.

User talk:Bait30/Archives/2020 1#Mswari

User talk:Mswari

Talk:Carol Blood

I have made it clear multiple times that I am not vandalizing an article and that I am removing content on the article per specific WP policies. It seems that a single-purpose account by the name of User:SeriousPolySci2020 was created earlier today and also refers to my edits, as well as the edits of Viewmont Viking ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), as vandalism. A newly created single-purpose account parroting the same arguments as Mswari definitely makes it seem like sockpuppetry. The talk page discussions provide context for arguments I'm referring to.  Bait30  Talk? 02:52, 9 January 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Possible. After review, I would say the technical data of these users is more consistent with two people who know each other, rather than the same person, but recruiting friends to register accounts to support one's side in a dispute is still a violation of Wikipedia policy. I am going to block both Mswari and SeriousPolySci2020 indefinitely. I don't think tags are needed at this time. Mz7 ( talk) 07:27, 9 January 2020 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook