This case is being reviewed by
Sir Sputnik as part of the clerk training process. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on their Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.
I've blocked the only other account that wasn't previously blocked (Cdoesyouth), so there's no rush here. I've also revoked TPA where appropriate. @
Bbb23: Would you take a look here at Fixer88? Katietalk14:27, 22 December 2017 (UTC)reply
@
KrakatoaKatie: What do you mean by "take a look"? Check the account? Do we have enough new behavioral evidence in your view to recheck the account? Not that Fixer88 is immune just because ArbCom chose to unblock him in 2016, but I would be loath to check without a good reason.--
Bbb23 (
talk)
15:37, 22 December 2017 (UTC)reply
@
Bbb23: I need a second opinion on the totality of Fixer88's technical evidence. I don't know if he's the master or if it's a bad coincidence, and yes, there's a good reason. Katietalk19:48, 22 December 2017 (UTC)reply
After discussion with Bbb23, we're of the opinion that Fixer88 is Unrelated. Clerk assistance requested: Please retag all these socks to the oldest listed account, which I think is Metlifecc. We're tainting Fixer88 unnecessarily here and we need to stop it. Katietalk22:05, 22 December 2017 (UTC)reply
This case is being reviewed by
Sir Sputnik as part of the clerk training process. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on their Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.
I've blocked the only other account that wasn't previously blocked (Cdoesyouth), so there's no rush here. I've also revoked TPA where appropriate. @
Bbb23: Would you take a look here at Fixer88? Katietalk14:27, 22 December 2017 (UTC)reply
@
KrakatoaKatie: What do you mean by "take a look"? Check the account? Do we have enough new behavioral evidence in your view to recheck the account? Not that Fixer88 is immune just because ArbCom chose to unblock him in 2016, but I would be loath to check without a good reason.--
Bbb23 (
talk)
15:37, 22 December 2017 (UTC)reply
@
Bbb23: I need a second opinion on the totality of Fixer88's technical evidence. I don't know if he's the master or if it's a bad coincidence, and yes, there's a good reason. Katietalk19:48, 22 December 2017 (UTC)reply
After discussion with Bbb23, we're of the opinion that Fixer88 is Unrelated. Clerk assistance requested: Please retag all these socks to the oldest listed account, which I think is Metlifecc. We're tainting Fixer88 unnecessarily here and we need to stop it. Katietalk22:05, 22 December 2017 (UTC)reply