IP started editing after Marburg72 'retired' and was given the RTV. This was after Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Marburg72 and an outburst against other editors on his talk page, which led to a short block. The commonality of articles edited and the outburst against myself and other editors on the IP's talk page are also clear evidence that this is a sock. He is now adding pointy cite tags, eg in the lead where the references are clearly in the article, which is the reason I am bringing this case. A 'vanished' editor should not be editing using a sock.
Dougweller ( talk) 21:38, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk declined because Stale Spitfire Tally-ho! 19:09, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
Clerk note: closing case because the filer has withdrawn. Regards, Spitfire Tally-ho! 20:28, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
Contribution history to Walam Olum article and talk page make it clear that 71.81.36.249 is Marburg72 (this includes links added to Talk:Mount Pisgah (North Carolina) by 71.81.36.249, a link to a page by someone whose other pages were frequently added by Marburg72. 68.225.74.35 ( talk · contribs) also seems to be an old IP used by Marburg72. Note that Marburg72 has not edited since exercising the right to vanish during Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Marburg72 but he clearly has continued editing. The rtv template was at one time removed from his talk page but restored by 166.137.8.38 ( talk · contribs). Dougweller ( talk) 06:44, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
A user cannot "vanish" and then "unvanish", "un-unvanish", etc.; one you "vanish", you don't come back. Consequently, Marburg72 has been indefinitely blocked, and both 71.81.32.0/20 and 166.137.8.0/21 have been blocked 1 month apiece. Moreover, User talk:Marburg72 has been indefinitely semi-protected. – MuZemike 22:20, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
IP started editing after Marburg72 'retired' and was given the RTV. This was after Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Marburg72 and an outburst against other editors on his talk page, which led to a short block. The commonality of articles edited and the outburst against myself and other editors on the IP's talk page are also clear evidence that this is a sock. He is now adding pointy cite tags, eg in the lead where the references are clearly in the article, which is the reason I am bringing this case. A 'vanished' editor should not be editing using a sock.
Dougweller ( talk) 21:38, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk declined because Stale Spitfire Tally-ho! 19:09, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
Clerk note: closing case because the filer has withdrawn. Regards, Spitfire Tally-ho! 20:28, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
Contribution history to Walam Olum article and talk page make it clear that 71.81.36.249 is Marburg72 (this includes links added to Talk:Mount Pisgah (North Carolina) by 71.81.36.249, a link to a page by someone whose other pages were frequently added by Marburg72. 68.225.74.35 ( talk · contribs) also seems to be an old IP used by Marburg72. Note that Marburg72 has not edited since exercising the right to vanish during Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Marburg72 but he clearly has continued editing. The rtv template was at one time removed from his talk page but restored by 166.137.8.38 ( talk · contribs). Dougweller ( talk) 06:44, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
A user cannot "vanish" and then "unvanish", "un-unvanish", etc.; one you "vanish", you don't come back. Consequently, Marburg72 has been indefinitely blocked, and both 71.81.32.0/20 and 166.137.8.0/21 have been blocked 1 month apiece. Moreover, User talk:Marburg72 has been indefinitely semi-protected. – MuZemike 22:20, 1 July 2011 (UTC)