Lukabeograd ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• DusanSilniVujovic ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki) (  Clerk note: originally filed under this user)

• Gagibgd ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools

Editor is inserting same POV as master here [1], [2] and [3]. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 17:05, 6 September 2022 (UTC) Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 17:05, 6 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• The user has a topic ban after ANI discussion User_talk:Gagibgd#You_are_now_subject_to_a_topic_ban. which the user has broken several times. Pelmeen10 ( talk) 16:48, 7 September 2022 (UTC) reply

• This case is too  Stale for CU comparison, but the following accounts are  Confirmed to each other:

• Lukabeograd ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Gagibgd ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 00:05, 23 September 2022 (UTC) reply

•  Awaiting administrative action - It seems that Gagibgd was created to evade sanctions on Lukabeograd. Please, indef both accounts. I'll take care of tagging later. Thank you. MarioGom ( talk) 18:05, 24 September 2022 (UTC) reply
• Blocked as requested. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 22:06, 24 September 2022 (UTC) reply
• While I didn't completely rule out that DusanSilniVujovic and Lukabeograd are the same person, there are some hints about them being different. I'm splitting the case, tagging, and closing. Thank you. MarioGom ( talk) 08:43, 25 September 2022 (UTC) reply

• Adelbeighou ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools

Editor Interaction utility may show more relevant results with Gagibgd. Similar style with Serbian POV pushing. [4] [5] Note that user also has impolite behaviour [6] Pelmeen10 ( talk) 15:53, 15 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

•  Check declined by a checkuser -  Stale -- Amanda (she/her) 20:54, 26 March 2023 (UTC) reply
•  Additional information needed. In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:

1. At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
2. At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
3. In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this. MarioGom ( talk) 10:07, 16 April 2023 (UTC) reply

• I cannot find enough evidence.  Closing without action. MarioGom ( talk) 23:26, 21 April 2023 (UTC) reply