From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Lfeza

Lfeza ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)

01 December 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Same falsification of charts positions to "#1" [1] [2]; editing the same articles (see [3]); maybe its too old to CU, but looking for sleepers. (CC) Tbhotch 21:12, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


07 January 2022

Suspected sockpuppets


I wanted to file this report yesterday, but it all happened at the end of my day and I was too tired. My investigation was triggered by Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Reporting Sysevnig and Chronicdial92, which reported two of the above listed accounts as socks. After looking at various related articles and seeing the obvious similarities in behavior and the fact that all of the accounts have been created relatively recently, I determined that three more unblocked accounts were socks and that Bcijbbw, who had been blocked for vandalism, was part of the same group. I therefore blocked the unblocked accounts and tagged all.

Because of the number of socks, though, and the number of related articles that I didn't check, I felt it would be better to file this report to confirm the blocks technically and to find out if there are accounts I failed to find; thus, I'm requesting CU. Also, because of the recent "developments" at SPI, I didn't want the clerks and checkusers to be bored. Bbb23 ( talk) 12:48, 7 January 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


12 March 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Same old nonsense (but instead of merely changing the charts to #1, this person is now copy-pasting charts from actually successful artists. [4] v. [5]) Considering that Innocreade ( talk · contribs) was another hit-and-run account, I'm looking for sleepers. (CC)  Tbhotch 21:13, 12 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


27 April 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

I actually don't know who the sockpuppeteer of this group is ... I'll simply go by which one is the earliest. All of them have been vandalizing a number of list articles in the Billboard 200 number-one albums series. In List of Billboard 200 number-one albums of 2017 [6] [7] [8], List of Billboard 200 number-one albums of 2012 [9] [10] [11], List of Billboard 200 number-one albums of 2016 [12] [13] [14], and List of Billboard 200 number-one albums of 2011 [15] [16]. (I will note that user Lofkbfbjf is indefinitely blocked, and if any of the more recently created accounts can be tied to that blocked user, then they are evading the block.) MPFitz1968 ( talk) 02:29, 27 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Adding User:Hytgbju to this report, after their vandalism at List of Billboard 200 number-one albums of 2016 [17] [18] and List of Billboard 200 number-one albums of 2017 [19] [20]. MPFitz1968 ( talk) 06:09, 27 April 2022 (UTC) reply

More evidence at Damn (Kendrick Lamar album) [21] [22] [23]. MPFitz1968 ( talk) 06:14, 27 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


29 April 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

This user: [24] [25]

Previous socks: [26] [27] [28].

MPFitz1968 ( talk) 11:20, 29 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


29 June 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

Massive additions to the article about the Notorious B.I.G. album Life After Death, particularly with incorrect chart and certifications data ... and from a cursory look at the sources provided, they don't match up with the article's subject (appears they are using sources about different albums/artists).

Ghurf: [29]

Gzjeo: [30]

There are probably one or two other users, at least, that have vandalized the article similarly in recent weeks. MPFitz1968 ( talk) 17:31, 29 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Highly likely to each other:
Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 23:44, 29 June 2023 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Lfeza

Lfeza ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)

01 December 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Same falsification of charts positions to "#1" [1] [2]; editing the same articles (see [3]); maybe its too old to CU, but looking for sleepers. (CC) Tbhotch 21:12, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


07 January 2022

Suspected sockpuppets


I wanted to file this report yesterday, but it all happened at the end of my day and I was too tired. My investigation was triggered by Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Reporting Sysevnig and Chronicdial92, which reported two of the above listed accounts as socks. After looking at various related articles and seeing the obvious similarities in behavior and the fact that all of the accounts have been created relatively recently, I determined that three more unblocked accounts were socks and that Bcijbbw, who had been blocked for vandalism, was part of the same group. I therefore blocked the unblocked accounts and tagged all.

Because of the number of socks, though, and the number of related articles that I didn't check, I felt it would be better to file this report to confirm the blocks technically and to find out if there are accounts I failed to find; thus, I'm requesting CU. Also, because of the recent "developments" at SPI, I didn't want the clerks and checkusers to be bored. Bbb23 ( talk) 12:48, 7 January 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


12 March 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Same old nonsense (but instead of merely changing the charts to #1, this person is now copy-pasting charts from actually successful artists. [4] v. [5]) Considering that Innocreade ( talk · contribs) was another hit-and-run account, I'm looking for sleepers. (CC)  Tbhotch 21:13, 12 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


27 April 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

I actually don't know who the sockpuppeteer of this group is ... I'll simply go by which one is the earliest. All of them have been vandalizing a number of list articles in the Billboard 200 number-one albums series. In List of Billboard 200 number-one albums of 2017 [6] [7] [8], List of Billboard 200 number-one albums of 2012 [9] [10] [11], List of Billboard 200 number-one albums of 2016 [12] [13] [14], and List of Billboard 200 number-one albums of 2011 [15] [16]. (I will note that user Lofkbfbjf is indefinitely blocked, and if any of the more recently created accounts can be tied to that blocked user, then they are evading the block.) MPFitz1968 ( talk) 02:29, 27 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Adding User:Hytgbju to this report, after their vandalism at List of Billboard 200 number-one albums of 2016 [17] [18] and List of Billboard 200 number-one albums of 2017 [19] [20]. MPFitz1968 ( talk) 06:09, 27 April 2022 (UTC) reply

More evidence at Damn (Kendrick Lamar album) [21] [22] [23]. MPFitz1968 ( talk) 06:14, 27 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


29 April 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

This user: [24] [25]

Previous socks: [26] [27] [28].

MPFitz1968 ( talk) 11:20, 29 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


29 June 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

Massive additions to the article about the Notorious B.I.G. album Life After Death, particularly with incorrect chart and certifications data ... and from a cursory look at the sources provided, they don't match up with the article's subject (appears they are using sources about different albums/artists).

Ghurf: [29]

Gzjeo: [30]

There are probably one or two other users, at least, that have vandalized the article similarly in recent weeks. MPFitz1968 ( talk) 17:31, 29 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Highly likely to each other:
Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 23:44, 29 June 2023 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook