MarkB40n is a sockpuppet of indefinitely-blocked user Plateau99. Plateau99 was blocked for a month, and this was when he started using MarkB40n. The first thing his sockpuppet attempted to do was make Zoophilia a sexual orientation, [1], similar to what Plateau99 tried to do [2] in the past. Here both are undoing "blanking" when it doesn't fit their pro-Zoophilia POV: Plateau99: [3] but was later reverted [4]. His sockpuppet [5] but later reverted [6]. An IP was involved [7] with valid concerns stated on the talk page and his reasons for removal, but MarkB40n accuses it as vandalism because it doesn't fit his pro-zoophilia POV and tries to get the page protected [8]. They both have the same edit summaries, and both edit a few times a month only to add non-neutral content to the Zoophilia articles. MarkB40n tries to hide his Zoophilia-related edits by making minor changes to other articles. For such a "new" user, MarkB40n sure knows his way around Wikipedia (using the book citation format in one of his very first edits, requesting page protection, warning users on their talk pages, etc.). Someone963852 ( talk) 23:37, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
MarkB40n is pushing the same sort of POV as Plateau [9] [10] I was alerted to this on my talk page on the 29th but I was too busy to follow up on this until now. Guerillero | My Talk 04:55, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Technically indistinguishable:
AGK [•] 16:30, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
All three exhibit similar editing patterns as User:Plateau99, who was indefinitely blocked for disruptive editing on Zoophilia related pages. Plateau99's sock User:MarkB40n was also blocked after Plateau99's indef, and this leads me to believe that he has not stop sock-puppeting.
If these are indeed confirmed socks, I highly doubt Latitude0116/ Plateau99 will stop sockpuppeting in the future. Someone963852 ( talk) 13:45, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Account created after the latest socks were blocked; seems to know his way around Wikipedia very well for a "new" user. Similar editing patterns as the previous socks User:Plateau99 and especially User:Female bodybuilder enthusiast (with the editing of tables and such). Similar edit summaries [17] as the other socks. I don't think he will stop socking in the future. Someone963852 ( talk) 14:53, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
(added)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Account was created on 22 October 2013, which was after the date the latest sock was banned. Exhibits the same editing patterns as the other previous socks, specifically 'CentrumZero' and 'Female bodybuilder enthusiast'.
All three have edited random LGBT articles, such as LGBT rights in the United States, LGBT rights in [state], Public opinion of same-sex marriage in the United States [18] [19] [20] (with all three accounts editing the tables), Same-sex marriage legislation in the United States [21] [22] [23], List of supporters of same-sex marriage in the United States [24] [25] [26], List of opponents of same-sex marriage in the United States [27] [28] etc. All three socks don't leave edit summaries.
The user is trying to 'legitimize' these socks by editing a bunch of LGBT articles, then later adding non-neutral POV material to the zoophilia articles (the purpose of Latitude0116's socks). Someone963852 ( talk) 05:59, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
-- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 16:29, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Gdca1 is another account created by the user Latitude0116/ Plateau99 after the account and its socks were blocked.
AHC300 was created a month after the previous sock was blocked [57]. User also has similar contribution history [58] to previous socks [59] [60] [61]. Reasons are similar to the previous socks [62]. These socks are all trying to appear "legitimate" by editing a bunch of LGBT related articles (mostly to edit templates and maps, while not leaving edit summaries) to hide their zoophilia-related edits. All socks had a lack of edit summaries. This user edited a female bodybuilding article [63], and one of the past socks was named Female bodybuilder enthusiast [64].
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I am not this other user, Latitude0116. I find it offensive that I am being accused of being someone I am not. I am also not User:AHC300. AHC300 has done a great job adding information to zoophilia-related articles. The only commonality is that we have edited zoophilia-related articles -- nothing more.
Looking at User:Someone963852's contributions history, it appears he accuses anyone who adds "pro-zoophilia" material of being a sockpuppet of this one user (Latitude0116). That is to say, if anyone adds anything perceived as being "pro-zoophilia", Someone963862 will then proceed to accuse that person of being a sockpuppet of this one user (Latitude0116).
Also, the accusations are baseless. Starting an edit summary with a capital letter? That's something most people do. Using the word "zoo"? That's also a commonly-used noun when discussing articles related to zoophilia. Gdca1 ( talk) 07:00, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
Gdca1 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
logs ·
filter log ·
block user ·
block log):
Closing because of inaction.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 16:26, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Timeline
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
User:AHC300 is a disruptive editor who exhibits the same agenda editing as the previous blocked socks, such as adding a bunch of original research and false claims not supported by the references in order to push a pro-zoophilia POV (see diffs from the archive). The user focuses on zoophilia-related articles such as Zoophilia, Legality of bestiality by country and territory, Legality of bestiality in the United States, Enumclaw horse sex case, etc. as did the previous socks, and edits other similar articles as the confirmed socks, such as Female bodybuilder enthusiast, CentrumZero, 61-1099lm, Chiseled abs cutter, GayTenn and Dawkinsfan44 (sort the first column of the table to 'F').
Here is an example of AHC300 adding original research, non-neutral POV, undue weight content in the "Arguments for bestiality" section [70] in order to promote the legalization of bestiality.
AHC300 was created less than a month after 61-1099lm/Chiseled/GayTenn were blocked.
AHC300 also has a particular interest in editing female bodybuilding-related articles and one of the past blocked sockpuppets was named ' Female bodybuilder enthusiast', who was blocked back in April 2013 [71]. The Editor Interaction Analyser tool shows that AHC300 and blocked sock Female bodybuilder enthusiast: [72] edit at least 80 articles in common. AHC300 has 135 overlapping articles with the confirmed socks, based on AHC300's edits matching theirs: [73]; these are very distinct and niche topics revolving around zoophilia, bestiality, female bodybuilding, same political views, LGBT rights in ____, etc.
'Female bodybuilder enthusiast' created the Legality of bestiality in the United States article [74] (which was previous reverted by another editor [75] because "some or most of the 'references' do not support what is written in the article") but the sock reverted it back in. After the socks were blocked, AHC300 popped up and became the main editor of that article, adding their own OR/SYNTH/deceptive content to the article [76] and still continues to do so. 'Female bodybuilder enthusiast' created an image to add to the Legality of bestiality in the United States article [77] and AHC300 also created a very similar image file to add to that same article [78] (accuracy of those images is debatable).
This is a clear case of WP:DUCK, but please let me know if you have additional questions. A checkuser on AHC300 would be helpful to check for sleeper accounts, since the previous blocked socks had multiple accounts at once and used proxies. Some1 ( talk) 15:55, 30 December 2020 (UTC) copy-edited, Some1 ( talk) 00:43, 31 December 2020 (UTC) Small additions, Some1 ( talk) 00:09, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Very likely based on behavior IMO. Previous sock created Rising Phoenix World Championships for example, and AHC300 has pretty much been the only other person interested in this topic. Both edit female bodybuilding, zoophilia/beastiality, LGBT legislative history and US elections. This seems quite a niche... AHC300 also registered a month after the last sock GayTenn had been blocked. Sadly, this is probably another sock that has evaded their block for years. -- Pudeo ( talk) 01:34, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
MarkB40n is a sockpuppet of indefinitely-blocked user Plateau99. Plateau99 was blocked for a month, and this was when he started using MarkB40n. The first thing his sockpuppet attempted to do was make Zoophilia a sexual orientation, [1], similar to what Plateau99 tried to do [2] in the past. Here both are undoing "blanking" when it doesn't fit their pro-Zoophilia POV: Plateau99: [3] but was later reverted [4]. His sockpuppet [5] but later reverted [6]. An IP was involved [7] with valid concerns stated on the talk page and his reasons for removal, but MarkB40n accuses it as vandalism because it doesn't fit his pro-zoophilia POV and tries to get the page protected [8]. They both have the same edit summaries, and both edit a few times a month only to add non-neutral content to the Zoophilia articles. MarkB40n tries to hide his Zoophilia-related edits by making minor changes to other articles. For such a "new" user, MarkB40n sure knows his way around Wikipedia (using the book citation format in one of his very first edits, requesting page protection, warning users on their talk pages, etc.). Someone963852 ( talk) 23:37, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
MarkB40n is pushing the same sort of POV as Plateau [9] [10] I was alerted to this on my talk page on the 29th but I was too busy to follow up on this until now. Guerillero | My Talk 04:55, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Technically indistinguishable:
AGK [•] 16:30, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
All three exhibit similar editing patterns as User:Plateau99, who was indefinitely blocked for disruptive editing on Zoophilia related pages. Plateau99's sock User:MarkB40n was also blocked after Plateau99's indef, and this leads me to believe that he has not stop sock-puppeting.
If these are indeed confirmed socks, I highly doubt Latitude0116/ Plateau99 will stop sockpuppeting in the future. Someone963852 ( talk) 13:45, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Account created after the latest socks were blocked; seems to know his way around Wikipedia very well for a "new" user. Similar editing patterns as the previous socks User:Plateau99 and especially User:Female bodybuilder enthusiast (with the editing of tables and such). Similar edit summaries [17] as the other socks. I don't think he will stop socking in the future. Someone963852 ( talk) 14:53, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
(added)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Account was created on 22 October 2013, which was after the date the latest sock was banned. Exhibits the same editing patterns as the other previous socks, specifically 'CentrumZero' and 'Female bodybuilder enthusiast'.
All three have edited random LGBT articles, such as LGBT rights in the United States, LGBT rights in [state], Public opinion of same-sex marriage in the United States [18] [19] [20] (with all three accounts editing the tables), Same-sex marriage legislation in the United States [21] [22] [23], List of supporters of same-sex marriage in the United States [24] [25] [26], List of opponents of same-sex marriage in the United States [27] [28] etc. All three socks don't leave edit summaries.
The user is trying to 'legitimize' these socks by editing a bunch of LGBT articles, then later adding non-neutral POV material to the zoophilia articles (the purpose of Latitude0116's socks). Someone963852 ( talk) 05:59, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
-- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 16:29, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Gdca1 is another account created by the user Latitude0116/ Plateau99 after the account and its socks were blocked.
AHC300 was created a month after the previous sock was blocked [57]. User also has similar contribution history [58] to previous socks [59] [60] [61]. Reasons are similar to the previous socks [62]. These socks are all trying to appear "legitimate" by editing a bunch of LGBT related articles (mostly to edit templates and maps, while not leaving edit summaries) to hide their zoophilia-related edits. All socks had a lack of edit summaries. This user edited a female bodybuilding article [63], and one of the past socks was named Female bodybuilder enthusiast [64].
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I am not this other user, Latitude0116. I find it offensive that I am being accused of being someone I am not. I am also not User:AHC300. AHC300 has done a great job adding information to zoophilia-related articles. The only commonality is that we have edited zoophilia-related articles -- nothing more.
Looking at User:Someone963852's contributions history, it appears he accuses anyone who adds "pro-zoophilia" material of being a sockpuppet of this one user (Latitude0116). That is to say, if anyone adds anything perceived as being "pro-zoophilia", Someone963862 will then proceed to accuse that person of being a sockpuppet of this one user (Latitude0116).
Also, the accusations are baseless. Starting an edit summary with a capital letter? That's something most people do. Using the word "zoo"? That's also a commonly-used noun when discussing articles related to zoophilia. Gdca1 ( talk) 07:00, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
Gdca1 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
logs ·
filter log ·
block user ·
block log):
Closing because of inaction.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 16:26, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Timeline
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
User:AHC300 is a disruptive editor who exhibits the same agenda editing as the previous blocked socks, such as adding a bunch of original research and false claims not supported by the references in order to push a pro-zoophilia POV (see diffs from the archive). The user focuses on zoophilia-related articles such as Zoophilia, Legality of bestiality by country and territory, Legality of bestiality in the United States, Enumclaw horse sex case, etc. as did the previous socks, and edits other similar articles as the confirmed socks, such as Female bodybuilder enthusiast, CentrumZero, 61-1099lm, Chiseled abs cutter, GayTenn and Dawkinsfan44 (sort the first column of the table to 'F').
Here is an example of AHC300 adding original research, non-neutral POV, undue weight content in the "Arguments for bestiality" section [70] in order to promote the legalization of bestiality.
AHC300 was created less than a month after 61-1099lm/Chiseled/GayTenn were blocked.
AHC300 also has a particular interest in editing female bodybuilding-related articles and one of the past blocked sockpuppets was named ' Female bodybuilder enthusiast', who was blocked back in April 2013 [71]. The Editor Interaction Analyser tool shows that AHC300 and blocked sock Female bodybuilder enthusiast: [72] edit at least 80 articles in common. AHC300 has 135 overlapping articles with the confirmed socks, based on AHC300's edits matching theirs: [73]; these are very distinct and niche topics revolving around zoophilia, bestiality, female bodybuilding, same political views, LGBT rights in ____, etc.
'Female bodybuilder enthusiast' created the Legality of bestiality in the United States article [74] (which was previous reverted by another editor [75] because "some or most of the 'references' do not support what is written in the article") but the sock reverted it back in. After the socks were blocked, AHC300 popped up and became the main editor of that article, adding their own OR/SYNTH/deceptive content to the article [76] and still continues to do so. 'Female bodybuilder enthusiast' created an image to add to the Legality of bestiality in the United States article [77] and AHC300 also created a very similar image file to add to that same article [78] (accuracy of those images is debatable).
This is a clear case of WP:DUCK, but please let me know if you have additional questions. A checkuser on AHC300 would be helpful to check for sleeper accounts, since the previous blocked socks had multiple accounts at once and used proxies. Some1 ( talk) 15:55, 30 December 2020 (UTC) copy-edited, Some1 ( talk) 00:43, 31 December 2020 (UTC) Small additions, Some1 ( talk) 00:09, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Very likely based on behavior IMO. Previous sock created Rising Phoenix World Championships for example, and AHC300 has pretty much been the only other person interested in this topic. Both edit female bodybuilding, zoophilia/beastiality, LGBT legislative history and US elections. This seems quite a niche... AHC300 also registered a month after the last sock GayTenn had been blocked. Sadly, this is probably another sock that has evaded their block for years. -- Pudeo ( talk) 01:34, 31 December 2020 (UTC)