Evidence
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Now this is odd, another account has just appealed to me on my user talk page, desperate to rescue the deleted article, with the rather nonsensical appeal "no other tweet made by winkipiedia (sic) has gotten that much traction for articles in creation. If it needs help then help us please! Chris nadeau." The "us" makes me wonder if this is meatpuppetry, but given the parade of accounts trying to use us a platform for this non-notable person, I think it's worth a look. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 23:10, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Unrelated. Odd is an understatement.--
Bbb23 (
talk)
15:19, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
This account has just popped up, attempting to establish a basis upon which further accounts editing from the same IP as Chrisnadeau1973 should not be blocked by us as socks of Chrisnadeau1973. He claims to be a colleague of Chrisnadeau1973 at work -- on a Sunday, for it's worth -- and appears to want to stake out a rationale for further edits on... what I wonder? Why would a new account who doesn't intend continue spamming on Kris Degioia zero right back to Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Kris Degioia or my user page -- apparently concerned in advance about the outcome of the next CU? Or we're simply being trolled for the lulz, with all these conflicting claims around wanting or not wanting to create articles about this Kris Degoia person. At any rate, WP:QUACK. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 21:41, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Likely, blocked, tagged, closing.--
Bbb23 (
talk)
00:59, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Both of these users are singularly focused on editing related to Kris Degioia and WTF Multimedia, just as previous socks of Waffen77 had done. Pliespuppy displays the standard sock behavior of making ten rapid fire minor edits to get autoconfirmed, then moving on to the promotional edits. This may also be related to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Chrisnadeau1973 and/or Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/IMZahidIqbal both of which involved socks with an interest in promoting Kris Degioia and WTF Multimedia, so maybe this should be cross-checked with those two cases. Deli nk ( talk) 15:44, 7 July 2017 (UTC) Deli nk ( talk) 15:44, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
WP:DUCK, see User talk:Truthandseek/sandbox. Already reported to AIV, placing here for tracking purposes. – Train2104 ( t • c) 18:40, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Sock was found to be likely per
this CU report. Entered for the record. IPs blocked.
—
Berean Hunter
(talk)
02:23, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Evidence
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Now this is odd, another account has just appealed to me on my user talk page, desperate to rescue the deleted article, with the rather nonsensical appeal "no other tweet made by winkipiedia (sic) has gotten that much traction for articles in creation. If it needs help then help us please! Chris nadeau." The "us" makes me wonder if this is meatpuppetry, but given the parade of accounts trying to use us a platform for this non-notable person, I think it's worth a look. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 23:10, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Unrelated. Odd is an understatement.--
Bbb23 (
talk)
15:19, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
This account has just popped up, attempting to establish a basis upon which further accounts editing from the same IP as Chrisnadeau1973 should not be blocked by us as socks of Chrisnadeau1973. He claims to be a colleague of Chrisnadeau1973 at work -- on a Sunday, for it's worth -- and appears to want to stake out a rationale for further edits on... what I wonder? Why would a new account who doesn't intend continue spamming on Kris Degioia zero right back to Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Kris Degioia or my user page -- apparently concerned in advance about the outcome of the next CU? Or we're simply being trolled for the lulz, with all these conflicting claims around wanting or not wanting to create articles about this Kris Degoia person. At any rate, WP:QUACK. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 21:41, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Likely, blocked, tagged, closing.--
Bbb23 (
talk)
00:59, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Both of these users are singularly focused on editing related to Kris Degioia and WTF Multimedia, just as previous socks of Waffen77 had done. Pliespuppy displays the standard sock behavior of making ten rapid fire minor edits to get autoconfirmed, then moving on to the promotional edits. This may also be related to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Chrisnadeau1973 and/or Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/IMZahidIqbal both of which involved socks with an interest in promoting Kris Degioia and WTF Multimedia, so maybe this should be cross-checked with those two cases. Deli nk ( talk) 15:44, 7 July 2017 (UTC) Deli nk ( talk) 15:44, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
WP:DUCK, see User talk:Truthandseek/sandbox. Already reported to AIV, placing here for tracking purposes. – Train2104 ( t • c) 18:40, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Sock was found to be likely per
this CU report. Entered for the record. IPs blocked.
—
Berean Hunter
(talk)
02:23, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.