This SPI filing procedure was recommended to me by ArbCom member: Risker [1]
Kala Bethere and Tuckerj1976 appear to be disruptive sockpuppets of a single person. Possibly the person who was previously permanently blocked for sock puppetry ie User: The7thdr who created Lotus Blossom (ak the 7th) and ClaireReal as sockpuppets. Both Kala Bethere and Tuckerj1976 are single purpose accounts whose very first edits were on the Transcendental Meditation article. Both accounts exhibit the same language, editing patterns, personal interests, bias and agenda as banned user The7thdr and his puppets: Lotus Blossom (ak the 7th) and ClaireReal. Please note that User:The7thdr has had other sock puppets [2] including Majical Camal, Mozart's Left Ankle and Meyouandhim.
Background and Timeline
1. Single purpose accounts
2. Critical of research on TM
3. Citing WP:MEDRS to make deletions of secondarily sourced text on scientific research.
4. Citing WP:FRINGE
5. Showing interest or knowledge of Bhuddist meditation practices. Note: Bhuddist meditation practices include: Shambala [62], Vippassana [63] and Mindfullness [64]
6. Accusing Littleolive Oil and Timid Guy of COI
7. Usage of the terms “intellectual dishonesty” and “omission by silence”
8. Expressing interest and knowledge of mantras
9. Interest in the lyrics of the Sexy Sadie song
10. Pretending to be new to Wiki but editing like a veteran
11. Creating artificial consensus on the talk page [110]
See Defending yourself against claims. I will refer all paranoid (and what appear to be desperate parties) to my earlier reply to this [ [111]]:
Well, if I am Kala Bethere, or indeed anyone else, this should prove interesting. I am sure a checkuser would quickly prove otherwise. I have attempted to be civil, and shall remain so, but the desperation (and paranoia it would seem) been shown by users who login from TM movement IPs is proving tiring. I will not enter into this level of childish behavior, but I am sure that a reliable admin can check. This is all I have to say on the matter although Kala has my sympathy, it must be deeply disturbing to be accused of having the same level of grammar and spilling (or should that be spelling?) as me . Have a good day Tuckerj1976 ( talk) 18:23, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
Edit: This must have taken sometime (and resources)[ [112]] However, the level of detail that has gone into this,the resources required, together with the notion that one person is really 3 or 4 might be argued to be like the statements made in this "leaked" document form the TM movement [ [113]] But I am sure this is just my paranoia developing. Nevertheless, it does seem to once again support the evidence that this article and it's editors need close scrutiny. Tuckerj1976 ( talk) 20:20, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
Finally, I would like to share Kala Bethere suggestion that this might be to simply distract from this evidence here: [ [114]] Tuckerj1976 ( talk) 20:48, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
@Kbob: Showing interest or knowledge of Bhuddist meditation practices. is [ [117]] evidence of knowledge of Buddhist Meditation Practices? I always that that Buddhism was more "rational" then this with no interest in "magic" (or is this incorrect?). I was actually referring to the "mana" cited in Christianity (Old Testament), Judaism (Torah), Islam (Koran) and Greek Myth (Homer, etc) This might be stretching the facts to make a point a little to far perhaps or is it simply that people now lack a classical education? Perhaps Disputandi pruritus ecclesiarum scabies? But let us not adversus solem ne loquitor. Or does this now make me (or the others cited) a sockpuppet of anyone editing the wiki entry on Latin? Tuckerj1976 ( talk) 17:23, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
@Kbob: "Accusing Littleolive Oil and Timid Guy of COI" True and to that you might want to add (together with Kbob) proven sockpuppetry as already found here: [ [118]] It might be considered somewhat ironic that a proven sockpuppet is accusing others of the same thing. Tuckerj1976 ( talk) 17:28, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
all having the same IP range or living in the same geographical location to be highly unlikely and would require immediate action. I would not expect any of these 3 users to use the feeble arguments being used here: [ [119]] and would be very disappointed if they were.
Should it be helpful, The7thdr made edits while logged-out using these IPs:
OTOH, I should note that some of the traits ascribed to the accounts are too common to be identifiers, at least individually. Among those are: "Critical of research on TM", "Citing WP:FRINGE", "Accusing Littleolive Oil and Timid Guy of COI", "Expressing interest and knowledge of mantras", and "Interest in the lyrics of the Sexy Sadie song". Will Beback talk 10:48, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
Clerk note: relisted for a double check by another checkuser, Spitfire Tally-ho! 08:52, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
Wien Klin Wochenschr.
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).Ospina p. 187
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).Ospina p. 148
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).Dakwar09
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).
This SPI filing procedure was recommended to me by ArbCom member: Risker [1]
Kala Bethere and Tuckerj1976 appear to be disruptive sockpuppets of a single person. Possibly the person who was previously permanently blocked for sock puppetry ie User: The7thdr who created Lotus Blossom (ak the 7th) and ClaireReal as sockpuppets. Both Kala Bethere and Tuckerj1976 are single purpose accounts whose very first edits were on the Transcendental Meditation article. Both accounts exhibit the same language, editing patterns, personal interests, bias and agenda as banned user The7thdr and his puppets: Lotus Blossom (ak the 7th) and ClaireReal. Please note that User:The7thdr has had other sock puppets [2] including Majical Camal, Mozart's Left Ankle and Meyouandhim.
Background and Timeline
1. Single purpose accounts
2. Critical of research on TM
3. Citing WP:MEDRS to make deletions of secondarily sourced text on scientific research.
4. Citing WP:FRINGE
5. Showing interest or knowledge of Bhuddist meditation practices. Note: Bhuddist meditation practices include: Shambala [62], Vippassana [63] and Mindfullness [64]
6. Accusing Littleolive Oil and Timid Guy of COI
7. Usage of the terms “intellectual dishonesty” and “omission by silence”
8. Expressing interest and knowledge of mantras
9. Interest in the lyrics of the Sexy Sadie song
10. Pretending to be new to Wiki but editing like a veteran
11. Creating artificial consensus on the talk page [110]
See Defending yourself against claims. I will refer all paranoid (and what appear to be desperate parties) to my earlier reply to this [ [111]]:
Well, if I am Kala Bethere, or indeed anyone else, this should prove interesting. I am sure a checkuser would quickly prove otherwise. I have attempted to be civil, and shall remain so, but the desperation (and paranoia it would seem) been shown by users who login from TM movement IPs is proving tiring. I will not enter into this level of childish behavior, but I am sure that a reliable admin can check. This is all I have to say on the matter although Kala has my sympathy, it must be deeply disturbing to be accused of having the same level of grammar and spilling (or should that be spelling?) as me . Have a good day Tuckerj1976 ( talk) 18:23, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
Edit: This must have taken sometime (and resources)[ [112]] However, the level of detail that has gone into this,the resources required, together with the notion that one person is really 3 or 4 might be argued to be like the statements made in this "leaked" document form the TM movement [ [113]] But I am sure this is just my paranoia developing. Nevertheless, it does seem to once again support the evidence that this article and it's editors need close scrutiny. Tuckerj1976 ( talk) 20:20, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
Finally, I would like to share Kala Bethere suggestion that this might be to simply distract from this evidence here: [ [114]] Tuckerj1976 ( talk) 20:48, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
@Kbob: Showing interest or knowledge of Bhuddist meditation practices. is [ [117]] evidence of knowledge of Buddhist Meditation Practices? I always that that Buddhism was more "rational" then this with no interest in "magic" (or is this incorrect?). I was actually referring to the "mana" cited in Christianity (Old Testament), Judaism (Torah), Islam (Koran) and Greek Myth (Homer, etc) This might be stretching the facts to make a point a little to far perhaps or is it simply that people now lack a classical education? Perhaps Disputandi pruritus ecclesiarum scabies? But let us not adversus solem ne loquitor. Or does this now make me (or the others cited) a sockpuppet of anyone editing the wiki entry on Latin? Tuckerj1976 ( talk) 17:23, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
@Kbob: "Accusing Littleolive Oil and Timid Guy of COI" True and to that you might want to add (together with Kbob) proven sockpuppetry as already found here: [ [118]] It might be considered somewhat ironic that a proven sockpuppet is accusing others of the same thing. Tuckerj1976 ( talk) 17:28, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
all having the same IP range or living in the same geographical location to be highly unlikely and would require immediate action. I would not expect any of these 3 users to use the feeble arguments being used here: [ [119]] and would be very disappointed if they were.
Should it be helpful, The7thdr made edits while logged-out using these IPs:
OTOH, I should note that some of the traits ascribed to the accounts are too common to be identifiers, at least individually. Among those are: "Critical of research on TM", "Citing WP:FRINGE", "Accusing Littleolive Oil and Timid Guy of COI", "Expressing interest and knowledge of mantras", and "Interest in the lyrics of the Sexy Sadie song". Will Beback talk 10:48, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
Clerk note: relisted for a double check by another checkuser, Spitfire Tally-ho! 08:52, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
Wien Klin Wochenschr.
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).Ospina p. 187
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).Ospina p. 148
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).Dakwar09
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).