Jakeshapiro ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• Jedi008 ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Darthzaman ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Fdesmet ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Surfdude08 ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

1. Special:Contributions/Surfdude08
2. Special:Contributions/Jedi008
3. Special:Contributions/Darthzaman
4. Special:Contributions/Fdesmet

All of the accounts have made either WP:SPA sole edits to the article J. David Shapiro, and/or have added wholly unsourced material to this WP:BLP article. Cirt ( talk) 22:40, 9 February 2010 (UTC) reply

See Defending yourself against claims.

Checkuser request – code letter: F (Other reason )

Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.    Requested by Cirt ( talk) 22:40, 9 February 2010 (UTC) reply

Violations of WP:BLP and disruptive editing using socks. Cirt ( talk) 22:40, 9 February 2010 (UTC) reply

 Clerk endorsed for CU on all accounts, thanks, Spitfire ^Tally-ho! 14:42, 10 February 2010 (UTC) reply

 Confirmed Jakeshapiro = Surfdude08 = Jedi008. Darthzaman is  Unrelated. Fdesmet is  Inconclusive. Dominic· t 06:06, 11 February 2010 (UTC) reply

Thank you. In that case, the account Jakeshapiro ( talk · contribs) would be another one to deal with, and tag - in addition to those previously listed above. Cirt ( talk) 06:10, 11 February 2010 (UTC) reply

Comment: Actually, from the logs, the account Jakeshapiro ( talk · contribs) appears to be the oldest and is therefore the master, not Surfdude08 ( talk · contribs) as previously thought. Cirt ( talk) 06:12, 11 February 2010 (UTC) reply

 Administrator note Jedi008 and Surfdude08 indefinitely blocked and tagged, Jakeshapiro blocked 2 weeks. The other two accounts don't readily fit the MO of the other socks, I'm afraid. – MuZemike 15:21, 11 February 2010 (UTC) reply

Nod, good judgment decision, agree with the close. Thank you, Cirt ( talk) 17:59, 11 February 2010 (UTC) reply

This case has been marked as closed. It will be archived after its final review by a Clerk or Checkuser.

• Bonkers2010 ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• Same pattern as prior  Confirmed socks, at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jakeshapiro/Archive, namely addition of unsourced info to BLP page. [1]
• All contributions are to same article as the prior socks, J. David Shapiro - WP:SPA behavior, despite the block and user talk page comments left at the main sockmaster account. [2]
• Checkuser will be helpful for technical checkuser data investigation, however a block on the sock can be made by an administrator based on the strong behavioral evidence of socking.

Thank you for your time, -- Cirt ( talk) 14:27, 1 September 2010 (UTC) reply

• Note: The last time it was discovered that the master account has been engaging in socking, it was blocked for two weeks. -- Cirt ( talk) 14:30, 1 September 2010 (UTC) reply

See Defending yourself against claims.

 Stale Bonkers2010 hasn't edited since April - this will need to be decided on behavioral evidence alone. TN X Man 14:36, 1 September 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks, please see note above, this should still be acted upon by administrators, based on the strong behavioral evidence that it is the same sockmaster, again. -- Cirt ( talk) 14:38, 1 September 2010 (UTC) reply

• Master & Sock indef blocked. NativeForeigner ^Talk/ _Contribs 04:15, 9 September 2010 (UTC) reply