From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jacobmicheal232

Jacobmicheal232 ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: suspected

26 June 2024

– This SPI case is open.

Suspected sockpuppets

Aside from the fact that this accounts name follows the same format as Jacobmichaels other socks (name-name-numbers) it is engaging in the same behavior as them, namely removing reliable information which paints Sulaiman al-fahim in a negative light, readding dubious information that paints him in a positiv light, and accusing editors who revert him engaging in vandalism I believe this is worth noting as the edits these users refer to as “vandalism” are, even if they are bad edits, clearly not vandalism. I also believe that, while this wanders into speculation, it is worth noting that Harald baselessly referred to an ip editor as a “sock” in a way that doesn’t make sense for an editor actually familiar with the term, a term that they may have picked up in their previous SPI Googleguy007 ( talk) 01:20, 26 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jacobmicheal232

Jacobmicheal232 ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: suspected

26 June 2024

– This SPI case is open.

Suspected sockpuppets

Aside from the fact that this accounts name follows the same format as Jacobmichaels other socks (name-name-numbers) it is engaging in the same behavior as them, namely removing reliable information which paints Sulaiman al-fahim in a negative light, readding dubious information that paints him in a positiv light, and accusing editors who revert him engaging in vandalism I believe this is worth noting as the edits these users refer to as “vandalism” are, even if they are bad edits, clearly not vandalism. I also believe that, while this wanders into speculation, it is worth noting that Harald baselessly referred to an ip editor as a “sock” in a way that doesn’t make sense for an editor actually familiar with the term, a term that they may have picked up in their previous SPI Googleguy007 ( talk) 01:20, 26 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments



Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook