Istochleukzonnaam ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

28 January 2011

Suspected sockpuppets

• Istochleukzonnaam ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• SwedishSven ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Knowalles ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• UbiDubiumIbiLibertas ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• *RollesEyes* ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Socks 1, 2 and 5 have recently been blocked for sock puppeteering on EN-Wiki and several others: [1] and [2] and [3].

Sock 1, 2 and 3 have a history of blocks in NL-Wiki: [4] and [5] and [6]

In several communications on NL-Wiki has admitted this to be an accurate list of his sock puppets: [7]. He has not indicated whether or not it is a complete list.

After these blocks and several other conflicts and pending an ArbCom case that he is a party in, user has (again on NL-Wiki) said on his Talk Page that he will retire from NL-Wiki and will return to EN-Wiki under a different name: [8] (I doubled checked and Google Translate will provide a decent enough translation).

For this reason I request that you keep the associated IP address blocked for a decent amount of time, and also preventively block socks 3 and 4. Whaledad ( talk) 03:13, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

•  Clerk note: Of the usernames listed, three are already blocked; the other two - Knowalles and UbiDubiumIbiLibertas - have either never edited here or haven't edited in months. I'm going to leave them alone for now and wait until they actually edit before blocking. And I don't think this is an appropriate time to block their underlying IPs, either. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 13:08, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply

31 May 2011

Suspected sockpuppets

• Istochleukzonnaam ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• SwedishSven ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• 101 Luftballons ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

The 101 Luftballons user account was created in EN Wiki on May 18, 2011 (never used) and on the same day from there expanded to NL Wiki. The sole purpose of this account at that time was to revert a change that I had implemented on May 6, 2011. The change is clearly not from a newby user. This user is then silent until May 29, when he again reverts on of my edits. The stalking of my edits is very similar to the JDL edits made by Istochleukzonnaam ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki) some 4 months ago. This even extends to the support by his Dutch colleague Kalsermar in reverting my edits. _W^\|/_haledad ( Talk to me) 19:03, 31 May 2011 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

•  Clerk declined - Both the master and SwedishSven are stale, so we can't run a CU there. And the master never edited Princes Flag as far as I can tell. Can you provide more diffs backing up your claims? — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 19:20, 31 May 2011 (UTC) reply
• Hmm, alright. 101 Luftballons has gone quiet, so I'm closing with no action taken. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 03:52, 2 June 2011 (UTC) reply