Iampbsocks
- Iampbsocks ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
09 October 2021
Suspected sockpuppets
- Line Bri ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Both users were created at the same exact minute ( Iampbsocks log, Line Bri logs) and are vandalizing the same article Self-Actualization; in order from earliest to latest, these edits can be found at: 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. They both could be blocked as VOA, but I'm suspicious that there might be sleepers and/or reasons to block the IP of the users so as to prohibit new account making. — Mikehawk10 ( talk) 05:19, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
This case is being reviewed by Tamzin as part of her training as a clerk. Please allow her to process the entire case without interference. You may pose any questions or concerns either on her talk page or on this page.
-
CheckUser is not for
fishing.
Clerk declined. AIV could probably handle this, but since we're here, and since these are ducks clearly created with
malice aforethought to disrupt,
Awaiting administrative action for indefinite blocks of both accounts. Normally I wouldn't ask for an indef of the master (which is technically Line Bri), but I don't see any evidence of being
here to build an encyclopedia, and furthermore have a suspicion that this ain't this user's first rodeo. --
Tamzin
cetacean needed (she/they) 06:03, 9 October 2021 (UTC) - Both now VOA-blocked by EL C. @
Tamzin: Why would it be fishing to check these two, considering that you also state that you
have a suspicion that this ain't this user's first rodeo
? -- Blablubbs ( talk) 13:14, 9 October 2021 (UTC)- @ Blablubbs: It was just a general thought as part of the rationale to indef rather than warn or tempblock; not something I'd be willing to hang an endorse on. I'd be open to endorsing based on a clearly-articulated reason to think a CU would find a master (per the "sock of someone" exception to NOTFISHING), but my comment was in response to the request for a sleeper check that did not state a reason to think there are sleepers. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she/they) 14:30, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- Closing. Since no action was taken as a direct result of this, I leave it to the next clerk's discretion whether to archive or G6. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she/they) 02:16, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Iampbsocks
- Iampbsocks ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
09 October 2021
Suspected sockpuppets
- Line Bri ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Both users were created at the same exact minute ( Iampbsocks log, Line Bri logs) and are vandalizing the same article Self-Actualization; in order from earliest to latest, these edits can be found at: 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. They both could be blocked as VOA, but I'm suspicious that there might be sleepers and/or reasons to block the IP of the users so as to prohibit new account making. — Mikehawk10 ( talk) 05:19, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
This case is being reviewed by Tamzin as part of her training as a clerk. Please allow her to process the entire case without interference. You may pose any questions or concerns either on her talk page or on this page.
-
CheckUser is not for
fishing.
Clerk declined. AIV could probably handle this, but since we're here, and since these are ducks clearly created with
malice aforethought to disrupt,
Awaiting administrative action for indefinite blocks of both accounts. Normally I wouldn't ask for an indef of the master (which is technically Line Bri), but I don't see any evidence of being
here to build an encyclopedia, and furthermore have a suspicion that this ain't this user's first rodeo. --
Tamzin
cetacean needed (she/they) 06:03, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- Both now VOA-blocked by EL C. @
Tamzin: Why would it be fishing to check these two, considering that you also state that you
have a suspicion that this ain't this user's first rodeo
? -- Blablubbs ( talk) 13:14, 9 October 2021 (UTC)- @ Blablubbs: It was just a general thought as part of the rationale to indef rather than warn or tempblock; not something I'd be willing to hang an endorse on. I'd be open to endorsing based on a clearly-articulated reason to think a CU would find a master (per the "sock of someone" exception to NOTFISHING), but my comment was in response to the request for a sleeper check that did not state a reason to think there are sleepers. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she/they) 14:30, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- Closing. Since no action was taken as a direct result of this, I leave it to the next clerk's discretion whether to archive or G6. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she/they) 02:16, 10 October 2021 (UTC)