Home • Search • Translate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Keith Bridgeman

Keith Bridgeman ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

see also Wikipedia:Long term abuse/General Tojo


Report date April 19 2009, 19:18 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by Yintaɳ 

All they do is generate identical attacks on the same editor (Chris73) Yintaɳ  19:18, 19 April 2009 (UTC) reply


Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users


Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 Clerk note:: Blocked as socks of General Tojo ( talk · contribs). Nathan T (formerly Avruch) 20:18, 19 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Conclusions
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.


Report date April 18 2009, 04:01 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by Mango juice talk

User:Anders Svensen was blocked as a sock of General Tojo; like many General Tojo socks, he had a specific real name username, a local area of interest, and made an edit to General Tojo's long term abuse page. I declined Anders Svensen's third unblock request, and as an obvious sockpuppet, I locked him from using the talk page. Soon after, Svensen created an obvious sockpuppet, User:Andy Svensen which he used to berate me for having declined his unblock request. I responded and immediately blocked this sock as well.

Soon after this, User:90.210.115.169 went on a vandalism spree, making personal attacks on me and vandalizing my user page: see Special:Contributions/90.210.115.169, practically all the edits are of this sort. During this vandalism spree, this user also reverted an edit of mine at Maltese (dog), an article I've been involved in closely lately, where things are quite tense and touchy. 90.210.115.169 was blocked 48 hours for vandalism. Later, a similar revert were made by User:90.207.61.71, who also made a personal attack comment against me at User talk:Imbris, an editor I've been collaborating with at the Maltese dog article.

Tonight, this same IP editor reverted the article. Soon afterwards, User:Maltese Dog Expert registered an account, and made a bunch of minor changes to the article. After all his edits were done ( [1] was the last), another new account was registered, User:Gerenti Favalia who made some more minor changes to the article. After I reverted the IP editor's revert, Gerenti Favalia reverted the page back. At this point I realized the dovetailing nature of the edits of these two new accounts, and also noted another similarity in their edit histories.

I'm asking that General Tojo or recent socks of his be checked, just to clarify the situation: is this General Tojo or a new troll that accidentally imitated Tojo's patterns? Mango juice talk 04:20, 18 April 2009 (UTC) reply

For clarification, I had listed this request under User:Anders Svensen because it's only the behavior after I declined the unblock request that I think is necessary to consider. I am not especially presenting evidence that this user is General Tojo, it was just the allegation. But I will alert User:Chris73, the blocking admin, if he wants to comment on it. Mango juice talk 04:20, 18 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users

Anders Svensen was blocked indef by me because of heavy suspicion of sockpuppetry, being a puppet of General Tojo, also known as Keith Bridgeman from London. He is known to try to make up fake aliases ( Swedish? Even copying text from Swedish language? That's really lame.) The harassment pattern Mangojuice experienced since then fits perfectly to Tojo - reverting edits of the user and name calling on his talk page, the latter preferred in uppercase. For examples please see my page history. Block on sight and revert. I took the liberty of blocking the above sockpuppets indef, too.-- Chris 73 | Talk 05:47, 18 April 2009 (UTC) reply

CheckUser requests
Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.    Requested by Mango juice talk 04:01, 18 April 2009 (UTC) reply


 Clerk endorsed per sufficient evidence of similarity to indef-blocked user. Mayalld ( talk) 07:32, 18 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Additional information needed: Please provide a code letter. SPCUClerkbot ( talk) 04:02, 18 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Conclusions
  •  Confirmed the following as one user:
  1. Anders Svensen ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  2. Dr B.R.Bartlett ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  3. Professor Johnson ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  4. Gerry Jon Murphy ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  5. Gerenti Favalia ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  6. Maltese Dog Expert ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  7. Andy Svensen ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  8. Bkjysyr d ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  9. Mary Sillitoe ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  10. F1895875176253651 ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  11. Tr8763gb ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  12. Sea Reen ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  13. 098j7pimjh ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  14. P98n7yiluh ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  15. 8W3IVHU ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  16. L7ibg5i76tgni ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  17. Gunga Dinnnnnnnnn ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  18. Qwgwsdd ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Blocked 90.207.0.0/17 AO, ACB for 24 hours. These users aren't operating from the Tiscali ISP, but it could still be General Tojo editing from a new location and new set of IPs. Nishkid64 ( Make articles, not wikidrama) 16:47, 18 April 2009 (UTC) reply

This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. 
See my note. 
Syn
ergy 22:17, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
reply



Report date April 22 2009, 12:25 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets
Evidence submitted by — Snigbrook

Appears to be an obvious sockpuppet - user is undoing edits by User:Chris 73 without explanation, e.g. [2]. — Snigbrook 12:25, 22 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users


CheckUser requests
Checkuser request – code letter: B  + E (Ongoing serious pattern vandalism and community ban/sanction evasion)
Current status – Declined, the reason can be found below.    Requested by — Snigbrook 12:25, 22 April 2009 (UTC) reply

 Clerk declined No Cu for ducks. Mayalld ( talk) 13:14, 22 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


Conclusions

 Completed Mayalld ( talk) 13:14, 22 April 2009 (UTC) reply

This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.

Mayalld ( talk) 13:14, 22 April 2009 (UTC) reply


Report date April 26 2009, 20:04 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by Momo san Gespräch


Appear to be General Tojo sockpuppets, Need to see if range blocks can be imposed.

Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users


CheckUser requests
Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.    Requested by Momo san Gespräch 20:04, 26 April 2009 (UTC) reply


Need to see if He is on Open Proxies and/or if range blocks can be imposed, also to root out sleeper accounts too.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Additional information needed: Please provide a code letter. SPCUClerkbot ( talk) 20:04, 26 April 2009 (UTC) reply

 Clerk endorsed — Jake Wartenberg 21:20, 27 April 2009 (UTC) reply
 In progress -- lucasbfr talk 08:32, 28 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Some  IP blocked. There's obviously some collateral, but that should annoy him a bit. -- Luk talk (lucasbfr) 12:30, 30 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Conclusions
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. 
Mayalld (
talk) 12:33, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
reply



Report date August 12 2009, 17:10 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets
Evidence submitted by Feydey

Appears to be General Tojo sockpuppet since adding his own book to Ferdinand Magellan ( diff) and removing other refs. feydey ( talk) 17:10, 12 August 2009 (UTC) reply

Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users


Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


Conclusions
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.



Keith Bridgeman

Keith Bridgeman ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Report date August 12 2009, 20:19 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets
Evidence submitted by Momusufan

Please see checkuser request below

Evidence submitted by tckma

See User:Your dear friend Aaron's edits to this very sockpuppet report. -- Tckma ( talk) 12:10, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply

Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users
CheckUser requests
Checkuser request – code letter: F (Other reason )
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.    Requested by Momo san Gespräch 20:19, 12 August 2009 (UTC) reply

Need to find out if this user chain is on a static IP or is on a dynamic range. This user may go in succession (Aaron Black 7, 8, 9, etc.) Momo san Gespräch 20:19, 12 August 2009 (UTC) reply

Looks like General Tojo is involved in these sockpuppets. Momo san Gespräch 21:09, 12 August 2009 (UTC) reply
  •  Clerk endorsed to weed out the rest of the sockfarm and to check for a block on the IP/range. MuZemike 22:01, 12 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Update: Several accounts have been created in succession, up to number 21, all of which have been blocked. \ Backslash Forwardslash / { talk} 11:37, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply


Conclusions  Confirmed All confirmed, tag at will, but the IP ranges are both very large and full of uninvolved editors, so a rangeblock is contraindicated; sorry. -- Avi ( talk) 04:41, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply

 Clerk note: Tagged. — Jake Wartenberg 01:06, 15 August 2009 (UTC) reply
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.
Report date August 15 2009, 11:26 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by Hell In A Bucket ( talk)
Hell In A Bucket (
talk) 11:26, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
reply


Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users


Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


Conclusions

 Clerk note: Both accounts have been blocked indef. — Jake Wartenberg 20:40, 15 August 2009 (UTC) reply

This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.




Report date October 26 2009, 13:38 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by Wknight94
Pathetically long-term vandal General Tojo using sleeper socks. In particular, Account name 21123 recently snuck through even though it was created weeks before the latest checkuser blocks. Any more deep in the drawer? Thanks. Wknight94 talk 13:38, 26 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 Clerk note: 90.207.88.252 and 90.216.40.113 have not edited before. They're all probably socks of Tojo, but I don't think blocking those IP would do much good here, as it looks like he's IP-hopping. MuZemike 19:20, 26 October 2009 (UTC) reply

The edit filter hears a lot of his childish tantrums. Those are just provided for additional info anyway. Wknight94 talk 19:34, 26 October 2009 (UTC) reply
OK, I get it. Thanks for the clarification. MuZemike 19:35, 26 October 2009 (UTC) reply
He's doing it even now. BTW, I snapped a recent picture (see right). Wknight94 talk 19:42, 26 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Checkuser request – code letter: B (Ongoing serious pattern vandalism )
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.

 Clerk endorsed. Sleepers are present here (see page history). PeterSymonds ( talk) 19:43, 26 October 2009 (UTC) reply

 Confirmed General Togo ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki) =


Also, Aaron_Black ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki) et al. are  Confirmed as being related to these accounts, so someone may want to update his casepage and/or socks. J.delanoy gabs adds 20:17, 26 October 2009 (UTC) reply

Oh, I thought everyone knew about the Aaron Black socks. Sorry if those aren't tied together clearly. Wknight94 talk 20:20, 26 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Conclusions
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.

Cases merged. Remaining accounts tagged. PeterSymonds ( talk) 20:32, 26 October 2009 (UTC) reply



Report date October 31 2009, 21:56 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by Wknight94

Well, it's about that time to check for more General Tojo socks. The list above are all blocked (I think) and include sleepers that snuck through prior checks. Hopefully they represent all IP ranges. Any sleepers and range blocks are appreciated. Thank you. Wknight94 talk 21:56, 31 October 2009 (UTC) reply

Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Checkuser request – code letter: B + E (Ongoing serious pattern vandalism and community ban/sanction evasion)
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.
  •  Clerk endorsed NW ( Talk) 22:13, 31 October 2009 (UTC) reply

All accounts listed are  Confirmed. The IPs are mostly correct, but very, very dynamic, so blocking them is extremely unlikely to produce any results.

Also I found these, some are new, some were listed here previously


and a lot more, but all of the other accounts on the ranges are blocked already, and these should be more than enough to furnish material for the next case.

All of the accounts I found that were not blocked are blocked now. Range blocks are not going to do anything here, unfortunately. J.delanoy gabs adds 23:21, 1 November 2009 (UTC) reply

Conclusions

 Clerk note: All registered accounts tagged as socks. MuZemike 18:10, 2 November 2009 (UTC) reply

This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.



Report date November 10 2009, 12:07 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by Wknight94
Time for another check for sleeper and good-hand socks. He is using sleepers to get around semi-protection and sometimes uses good-hand socks to promote his useless web site. I included the most recent socks as well as a list from the last check as recommended by Jdelanoy. Thanks as always. Wknight94 talk 12:07, 10 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Checkuser request – code letter: B + E (Ongoing serious pattern vandalism and community ban/sanction evasion)
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.
  •  Clerk endorsed. NW ( Talk) 12:44, 10 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Conclusions
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.


16 April 2011
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Sad old Keith Bridgeman (AKA General Tojo) has returned to spam his sad old publishing company, Viartis. As usual, he'll be reverting people's edits and whining for a while until he realizes he is embarrassing himself personally and professionally - again. In case I missed any, please do a sleeper sock check. Thank you. Wknight94 talk 03:50, 16 April 2011 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
  •  Clerk endorsed - So endorsing for sleepers. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 13:10, 16 April 2011 (UTC) reply
    • No sleepers that I saw (although all the accounts listed are indeed matches to each other). If this is Tojo, it would need to be archived there. TN X Man 13:22, 16 April 2011 (UTC) reply
  •  Clerk note: Looking at the General Tojo stuff, I think we should keep them separate for now. There seems to be confusion as to what was going on there, so I don't think we need to add to the mess. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 13:53, 16 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Keith_Bridgeman/Archive&oldid=1084293656"
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Keith Bridgeman

Keith Bridgeman ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

see also Wikipedia:Long term abuse/General Tojo


Report date April 19 2009, 19:18 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by Yintaɳ 

All they do is generate identical attacks on the same editor (Chris73) Yintaɳ  19:18, 19 April 2009 (UTC) reply


Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users


Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 Clerk note:: Blocked as socks of General Tojo ( talk · contribs). Nathan T (formerly Avruch) 20:18, 19 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Conclusions
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.


Report date April 18 2009, 04:01 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by Mango juice talk

User:Anders Svensen was blocked as a sock of General Tojo; like many General Tojo socks, he had a specific real name username, a local area of interest, and made an edit to General Tojo's long term abuse page. I declined Anders Svensen's third unblock request, and as an obvious sockpuppet, I locked him from using the talk page. Soon after, Svensen created an obvious sockpuppet, User:Andy Svensen which he used to berate me for having declined his unblock request. I responded and immediately blocked this sock as well.

Soon after this, User:90.210.115.169 went on a vandalism spree, making personal attacks on me and vandalizing my user page: see Special:Contributions/90.210.115.169, practically all the edits are of this sort. During this vandalism spree, this user also reverted an edit of mine at Maltese (dog), an article I've been involved in closely lately, where things are quite tense and touchy. 90.210.115.169 was blocked 48 hours for vandalism. Later, a similar revert were made by User:90.207.61.71, who also made a personal attack comment against me at User talk:Imbris, an editor I've been collaborating with at the Maltese dog article.

Tonight, this same IP editor reverted the article. Soon afterwards, User:Maltese Dog Expert registered an account, and made a bunch of minor changes to the article. After all his edits were done ( [1] was the last), another new account was registered, User:Gerenti Favalia who made some more minor changes to the article. After I reverted the IP editor's revert, Gerenti Favalia reverted the page back. At this point I realized the dovetailing nature of the edits of these two new accounts, and also noted another similarity in their edit histories.

I'm asking that General Tojo or recent socks of his be checked, just to clarify the situation: is this General Tojo or a new troll that accidentally imitated Tojo's patterns? Mango juice talk 04:20, 18 April 2009 (UTC) reply

For clarification, I had listed this request under User:Anders Svensen because it's only the behavior after I declined the unblock request that I think is necessary to consider. I am not especially presenting evidence that this user is General Tojo, it was just the allegation. But I will alert User:Chris73, the blocking admin, if he wants to comment on it. Mango juice talk 04:20, 18 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users

Anders Svensen was blocked indef by me because of heavy suspicion of sockpuppetry, being a puppet of General Tojo, also known as Keith Bridgeman from London. He is known to try to make up fake aliases ( Swedish? Even copying text from Swedish language? That's really lame.) The harassment pattern Mangojuice experienced since then fits perfectly to Tojo - reverting edits of the user and name calling on his talk page, the latter preferred in uppercase. For examples please see my page history. Block on sight and revert. I took the liberty of blocking the above sockpuppets indef, too.-- Chris 73 | Talk 05:47, 18 April 2009 (UTC) reply

CheckUser requests
Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.    Requested by Mango juice talk 04:01, 18 April 2009 (UTC) reply


 Clerk endorsed per sufficient evidence of similarity to indef-blocked user. Mayalld ( talk) 07:32, 18 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Additional information needed: Please provide a code letter. SPCUClerkbot ( talk) 04:02, 18 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Conclusions
  •  Confirmed the following as one user:
  1. Anders Svensen ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  2. Dr B.R.Bartlett ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  3. Professor Johnson ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  4. Gerry Jon Murphy ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  5. Gerenti Favalia ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  6. Maltese Dog Expert ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  7. Andy Svensen ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  8. Bkjysyr d ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  9. Mary Sillitoe ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  10. F1895875176253651 ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  11. Tr8763gb ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  12. Sea Reen ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  13. 098j7pimjh ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  14. P98n7yiluh ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  15. 8W3IVHU ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  16. L7ibg5i76tgni ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  17. Gunga Dinnnnnnnnn ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  18. Qwgwsdd ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Blocked 90.207.0.0/17 AO, ACB for 24 hours. These users aren't operating from the Tiscali ISP, but it could still be General Tojo editing from a new location and new set of IPs. Nishkid64 ( Make articles, not wikidrama) 16:47, 18 April 2009 (UTC) reply

This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. 
See my note. 
Syn
ergy 22:17, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
reply



Report date April 22 2009, 12:25 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets
Evidence submitted by — Snigbrook

Appears to be an obvious sockpuppet - user is undoing edits by User:Chris 73 without explanation, e.g. [2]. — Snigbrook 12:25, 22 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users


CheckUser requests
Checkuser request – code letter: B  + E (Ongoing serious pattern vandalism and community ban/sanction evasion)
Current status – Declined, the reason can be found below.    Requested by — Snigbrook 12:25, 22 April 2009 (UTC) reply

 Clerk declined No Cu for ducks. Mayalld ( talk) 13:14, 22 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


Conclusions

 Completed Mayalld ( talk) 13:14, 22 April 2009 (UTC) reply

This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.

Mayalld ( talk) 13:14, 22 April 2009 (UTC) reply


Report date April 26 2009, 20:04 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by Momo san Gespräch


Appear to be General Tojo sockpuppets, Need to see if range blocks can be imposed.

Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users


CheckUser requests
Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.    Requested by Momo san Gespräch 20:04, 26 April 2009 (UTC) reply


Need to see if He is on Open Proxies and/or if range blocks can be imposed, also to root out sleeper accounts too.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Additional information needed: Please provide a code letter. SPCUClerkbot ( talk) 20:04, 26 April 2009 (UTC) reply

 Clerk endorsed — Jake Wartenberg 21:20, 27 April 2009 (UTC) reply
 In progress -- lucasbfr talk 08:32, 28 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Some  IP blocked. There's obviously some collateral, but that should annoy him a bit. -- Luk talk (lucasbfr) 12:30, 30 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Conclusions
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. 
Mayalld (
talk) 12:33, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
reply



Report date August 12 2009, 17:10 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets
Evidence submitted by Feydey

Appears to be General Tojo sockpuppet since adding his own book to Ferdinand Magellan ( diff) and removing other refs. feydey ( talk) 17:10, 12 August 2009 (UTC) reply

Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users


Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


Conclusions
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.



Keith Bridgeman

Keith Bridgeman ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Report date August 12 2009, 20:19 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets
Evidence submitted by Momusufan

Please see checkuser request below

Evidence submitted by tckma

See User:Your dear friend Aaron's edits to this very sockpuppet report. -- Tckma ( talk) 12:10, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply

Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users
CheckUser requests
Checkuser request – code letter: F (Other reason )
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.    Requested by Momo san Gespräch 20:19, 12 August 2009 (UTC) reply

Need to find out if this user chain is on a static IP or is on a dynamic range. This user may go in succession (Aaron Black 7, 8, 9, etc.) Momo san Gespräch 20:19, 12 August 2009 (UTC) reply

Looks like General Tojo is involved in these sockpuppets. Momo san Gespräch 21:09, 12 August 2009 (UTC) reply
  •  Clerk endorsed to weed out the rest of the sockfarm and to check for a block on the IP/range. MuZemike 22:01, 12 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Update: Several accounts have been created in succession, up to number 21, all of which have been blocked. \ Backslash Forwardslash / { talk} 11:37, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply


Conclusions  Confirmed All confirmed, tag at will, but the IP ranges are both very large and full of uninvolved editors, so a rangeblock is contraindicated; sorry. -- Avi ( talk) 04:41, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply

 Clerk note: Tagged. — Jake Wartenberg 01:06, 15 August 2009 (UTC) reply
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.
Report date August 15 2009, 11:26 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by Hell In A Bucket ( talk)
Hell In A Bucket (
talk) 11:26, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
reply


Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users


Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


Conclusions

 Clerk note: Both accounts have been blocked indef. — Jake Wartenberg 20:40, 15 August 2009 (UTC) reply

This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.




Report date October 26 2009, 13:38 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by Wknight94
Pathetically long-term vandal General Tojo using sleeper socks. In particular, Account name 21123 recently snuck through even though it was created weeks before the latest checkuser blocks. Any more deep in the drawer? Thanks. Wknight94 talk 13:38, 26 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 Clerk note: 90.207.88.252 and 90.216.40.113 have not edited before. They're all probably socks of Tojo, but I don't think blocking those IP would do much good here, as it looks like he's IP-hopping. MuZemike 19:20, 26 October 2009 (UTC) reply

The edit filter hears a lot of his childish tantrums. Those are just provided for additional info anyway. Wknight94 talk 19:34, 26 October 2009 (UTC) reply
OK, I get it. Thanks for the clarification. MuZemike 19:35, 26 October 2009 (UTC) reply
He's doing it even now. BTW, I snapped a recent picture (see right). Wknight94 talk 19:42, 26 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Checkuser request – code letter: B (Ongoing serious pattern vandalism )
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.

 Clerk endorsed. Sleepers are present here (see page history). PeterSymonds ( talk) 19:43, 26 October 2009 (UTC) reply

 Confirmed General Togo ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki) =


Also, Aaron_Black ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki) et al. are  Confirmed as being related to these accounts, so someone may want to update his casepage and/or socks. J.delanoy gabs adds 20:17, 26 October 2009 (UTC) reply

Oh, I thought everyone knew about the Aaron Black socks. Sorry if those aren't tied together clearly. Wknight94 talk 20:20, 26 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Conclusions
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.

Cases merged. Remaining accounts tagged. PeterSymonds ( talk) 20:32, 26 October 2009 (UTC) reply



Report date October 31 2009, 21:56 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by Wknight94

Well, it's about that time to check for more General Tojo socks. The list above are all blocked (I think) and include sleepers that snuck through prior checks. Hopefully they represent all IP ranges. Any sleepers and range blocks are appreciated. Thank you. Wknight94 talk 21:56, 31 October 2009 (UTC) reply

Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Checkuser request – code letter: B + E (Ongoing serious pattern vandalism and community ban/sanction evasion)
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.
  •  Clerk endorsed NW ( Talk) 22:13, 31 October 2009 (UTC) reply

All accounts listed are  Confirmed. The IPs are mostly correct, but very, very dynamic, so blocking them is extremely unlikely to produce any results.

Also I found these, some are new, some were listed here previously


and a lot more, but all of the other accounts on the ranges are blocked already, and these should be more than enough to furnish material for the next case.

All of the accounts I found that were not blocked are blocked now. Range blocks are not going to do anything here, unfortunately. J.delanoy gabs adds 23:21, 1 November 2009 (UTC) reply

Conclusions

 Clerk note: All registered accounts tagged as socks. MuZemike 18:10, 2 November 2009 (UTC) reply

This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.



Report date November 10 2009, 12:07 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by Wknight94
Time for another check for sleeper and good-hand socks. He is using sleepers to get around semi-protection and sometimes uses good-hand socks to promote his useless web site. I included the most recent socks as well as a list from the last check as recommended by Jdelanoy. Thanks as always. Wknight94 talk 12:07, 10 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Checkuser request – code letter: B + E (Ongoing serious pattern vandalism and community ban/sanction evasion)
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.
  •  Clerk endorsed. NW ( Talk) 12:44, 10 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Conclusions
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.


16 April 2011
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Sad old Keith Bridgeman (AKA General Tojo) has returned to spam his sad old publishing company, Viartis. As usual, he'll be reverting people's edits and whining for a while until he realizes he is embarrassing himself personally and professionally - again. In case I missed any, please do a sleeper sock check. Thank you. Wknight94 talk 03:50, 16 April 2011 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
  •  Clerk endorsed - So endorsing for sleepers. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 13:10, 16 April 2011 (UTC) reply
    • No sleepers that I saw (although all the accounts listed are indeed matches to each other). If this is Tojo, it would need to be archived there. TN X Man 13:22, 16 April 2011 (UTC) reply
  •  Clerk note: Looking at the General Tojo stuff, I think we should keep them separate for now. There seems to be confusion as to what was going on there, so I don't think we need to add to the mess. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 13:53, 16 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Keith_Bridgeman/Archive&oldid=1084293656"

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook




Top Of Page

Home • Search • Translate

© CSE