Those users, in same pattern, have edited the top-importance page boron and its talk page, excessively promoting publications by a certain group and demoting achievements by other groups: diff ESRFBeam, diff GFZLab, diff 66.204.147.253.
This destabilizes the boron page hindering its upgrade to GA and further. My attempt to discuss the issue failed: User:GFZLab has not responded; instead new User:ESRFBeam reinstated the edits of User:GFZLab (see diff above). User:Dian john1 did not edit boron, but insisted on same changes (promotion of same group and demotion of same other groups). He previously went into personal abuse against a third-party, real-life person, for which reason his contributions 1 and 2 were erased by administrators.
Quack quack. Master blocked for 1 week; 2 socks blocked indef; IP blocked for a week. PeterSymonds ( talk) 10:26, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
PeterSymonds ( talk) 10:26, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
After taking action on Sockpuppet investigation GFZLab, User:Dian_john1 (sockpuppet of User:GFZLab) has reinstated his previous personal attacks; and IP:194.254.166.46 has recovered the previous edits of page Boron by GFZlab or ESRFBeam (promoting one team and demoting another). There was no attempt to discuss the issue at Talk:Boron, User_talk:NIMSoffice or any other Wikipedia page I am aware of.
![]() |
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
Peter blocked the account, I blocked the IP for 72 hours. Tag/archive please —— nix eagle email me 14:50, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
Newly created user:Aoganov behaves in the same pattern as Dian_john1/GFZLab (see 1, 2, bottom of 3 and his his userpage). Namely,
I declare I have no prejudices for or against any of these people (whom I know only by their work) and that I do my best to improve Wikipedia, to stay neutral and to resolve issues peacefully - and I succedeed in all previous disagreements.
However, after previous GFZLab investigation, user:Aoganov launched personal attacks on myself, editing my userpage, associating my account with Dr. Dubrovinskaia, and accusing Dr. Dubrovinskaia/NIMSoffice of unethical behavior on Wikipedia and in the scientific world (numerous personal attacks accusing real-world people on different WP pages; cleanup will be required). This does divert me from my other Wikipedia projects and puts responsibility for my actions on a distinguished scientist.
A minor comment, Aoganov does not stop with accusing individuals, but goes on to discredit organizations, e.g. a scientific journal Sci.Tech.Adv.Mater. (STAM) as highly obscure (I call it SPAM).
Technical comment: this associates previously used IP:129.49.95.70 with Aoganov and this and that edits relate IP:24.186.165.248 with Aoganov. According to his website, the user works at US university, travels a lot (e.g. to Paris). There is multiple (sometimes circumstantial) evidence that he has used several IPs. Thus blocking IP will hardly be efficient. Please note that the person posted his (real or assumed) identity and seems unreserved in his actions that makes this issue more delicate now. Please redirect to a right person if doubts. I guess User:Bjweeks has handled user:Dian john1 before opening this case.
There is circumstantial evidence: EAR request NIMSoffice/Dubrovinskaia and systematic removal of publications by Dubrovinskaia, linking IP:87.234.240.29 and maybe IP:87.164.198.76 to this case.
Compare this edit, made by 194.254.166.46, with this identical edit, made by a self-identified Oganov address for example. Indeed, compare the substance of this edit, where a citation of Sci.Tech.Adv.Mater is removed, with the statement made above.
The self-identified accountless edits pre-date the date that Aoganov claims to have started editing. So, too, do the non-self-identified accountless edits that are identical. They pre-date it by days and weeks, not hours, moreover.
It's already been established that ESRFBeam, GFZLab, and Dian john1 are all one and the same. The edits that link the two groups are this one by ESRFBeam, and this identical one by a self-identified Oganov address. entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem. There's one person behind all of these edits. Uncle G ( talk) 20:06, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
Those users, in same pattern, have edited the top-importance page boron and its talk page, excessively promoting publications by a certain group and demoting achievements by other groups: diff ESRFBeam, diff GFZLab, diff 66.204.147.253.
This destabilizes the boron page hindering its upgrade to GA and further. My attempt to discuss the issue failed: User:GFZLab has not responded; instead new User:ESRFBeam reinstated the edits of User:GFZLab (see diff above). User:Dian john1 did not edit boron, but insisted on same changes (promotion of same group and demotion of same other groups). He previously went into personal abuse against a third-party, real-life person, for which reason his contributions 1 and 2 were erased by administrators.
Quack quack. Master blocked for 1 week; 2 socks blocked indef; IP blocked for a week. PeterSymonds ( talk) 10:26, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
PeterSymonds ( talk) 10:26, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
After taking action on Sockpuppet investigation GFZLab, User:Dian_john1 (sockpuppet of User:GFZLab) has reinstated his previous personal attacks; and IP:194.254.166.46 has recovered the previous edits of page Boron by GFZlab or ESRFBeam (promoting one team and demoting another). There was no attempt to discuss the issue at Talk:Boron, User_talk:NIMSoffice or any other Wikipedia page I am aware of.
![]() |
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
Peter blocked the account, I blocked the IP for 72 hours. Tag/archive please —— nix eagle email me 14:50, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
Newly created user:Aoganov behaves in the same pattern as Dian_john1/GFZLab (see 1, 2, bottom of 3 and his his userpage). Namely,
I declare I have no prejudices for or against any of these people (whom I know only by their work) and that I do my best to improve Wikipedia, to stay neutral and to resolve issues peacefully - and I succedeed in all previous disagreements.
However, after previous GFZLab investigation, user:Aoganov launched personal attacks on myself, editing my userpage, associating my account with Dr. Dubrovinskaia, and accusing Dr. Dubrovinskaia/NIMSoffice of unethical behavior on Wikipedia and in the scientific world (numerous personal attacks accusing real-world people on different WP pages; cleanup will be required). This does divert me from my other Wikipedia projects and puts responsibility for my actions on a distinguished scientist.
A minor comment, Aoganov does not stop with accusing individuals, but goes on to discredit organizations, e.g. a scientific journal Sci.Tech.Adv.Mater. (STAM) as highly obscure (I call it SPAM).
Technical comment: this associates previously used IP:129.49.95.70 with Aoganov and this and that edits relate IP:24.186.165.248 with Aoganov. According to his website, the user works at US university, travels a lot (e.g. to Paris). There is multiple (sometimes circumstantial) evidence that he has used several IPs. Thus blocking IP will hardly be efficient. Please note that the person posted his (real or assumed) identity and seems unreserved in his actions that makes this issue more delicate now. Please redirect to a right person if doubts. I guess User:Bjweeks has handled user:Dian john1 before opening this case.
There is circumstantial evidence: EAR request NIMSoffice/Dubrovinskaia and systematic removal of publications by Dubrovinskaia, linking IP:87.234.240.29 and maybe IP:87.164.198.76 to this case.
Compare this edit, made by 194.254.166.46, with this identical edit, made by a self-identified Oganov address for example. Indeed, compare the substance of this edit, where a citation of Sci.Tech.Adv.Mater is removed, with the statement made above.
The self-identified accountless edits pre-date the date that Aoganov claims to have started editing. So, too, do the non-self-identified accountless edits that are identical. They pre-date it by days and weeks, not hours, moreover.
It's already been established that ESRFBeam, GFZLab, and Dian john1 are all one and the same. The edits that link the two groups are this one by ESRFBeam, and this identical one by a self-identified Oganov address. entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem. There's one person behind all of these edits. Uncle G ( talk) 20:06, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |