From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Emperordarius

Emperordarius ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)
Report date February 1 2010, 19:21 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by Athenean

2007apm is an Albanian national POV advocacy SPA that is strongly reminiscent of the User:EmpMac sock of User:Emperordarius. He shares the same ultranationalist POV of Emperordarius [1] and the same bizarre fascination with sexual topics [2] [3] as the EmpMac sock [4]. The odds of this being the same person are thus pretty high, but a checkuser is necessary to be sure. Athenean ( talk) 19:21, 1 February 2010 (UTC) reply


Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
Current status – Declined, the reason can be found below.    Requested by Athenean ( talk) 19:21, 1 February 2010 (UTC) reply

 Clerk declined – Behavioral evidence clearly indicates that this is Emperordarius. No CU necessary. – MuZemike 20:58, 2 February 2010 (UTC) reply

information Administrator note Blocked and tagged. – MuZemike 20:58, 2 February 2010 (UTC) reply

This case has been marked as closed. It will be archived after its final review by a Clerk or Checkuser.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Emperordarius

Emperordarius ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)
Report date February 1 2010, 19:21 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by Athenean

2007apm is an Albanian national POV advocacy SPA that is strongly reminiscent of the User:EmpMac sock of User:Emperordarius. He shares the same ultranationalist POV of Emperordarius [1] and the same bizarre fascination with sexual topics [2] [3] as the EmpMac sock [4]. The odds of this being the same person are thus pretty high, but a checkuser is necessary to be sure. Athenean ( talk) 19:21, 1 February 2010 (UTC) reply


Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
Current status – Declined, the reason can be found below.    Requested by Athenean ( talk) 19:21, 1 February 2010 (UTC) reply

 Clerk declined – Behavioral evidence clearly indicates that this is Emperordarius. No CU necessary. – MuZemike 20:58, 2 February 2010 (UTC) reply

information Administrator note Blocked and tagged. – MuZemike 20:58, 2 February 2010 (UTC) reply

This case has been marked as closed. It will be archived after its final review by a Clerk or Checkuser.


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook