143..241 was blocked for vandalism and the master became active almost immediately. They continued the same edits and ended up indef blocked. 50..92 followed the same pattern a day later. Not long after 143..241 was once again blocked, Kpprior popped up with the same edits so I blocked them per DUCK. Today, we have Kevboprior making the same edits. All users and one IP are now blocked, but I'd like to request a sleeper check to root out any others. Thanks — DoRD ( talk) 14:27, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Ask for sleepers and ye shall receive:
The user vandalized Jeff Daniels and created an attack page with the same material - the sockmaster is similarly obsessed with Daniels' article. Due to the user's claim here, I believe this to be the same person as the master and would like a sleeper check. Thanks. — DoRD ( talk) 13:47, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
First account blocked per DUCK and admitted to being a sock. Second and third accounts are suspected due to editing patterns and I have blocked the accounts. Requesting sleeper check since last check produced a lot of socks. Editor is also claiming " nearly one hundred sleepers". -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 17:22, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Since the DoRDo account was created at ACC, could we also have a block on the IP(s) he's using so that the ACC volunteers will have some warning? Thanks — DoRD ( talk) 17:28, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
Sleeper check. Alexandria (talk) 15:39, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
More of the same, i.e. obsession with Jeff Daniels and Dumb and Dumber. These are already blocked, and I know a couple of sweeps were recently run, but these just keep popping up. — DoRD ( talk) 19:43, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Looks like Courcelles ( talk · contribs) got them all. Elockid ( Talk) 23:08, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
143..241 was blocked for vandalism and the master became active almost immediately. They continued the same edits and ended up indef blocked. 50..92 followed the same pattern a day later. Not long after 143..241 was once again blocked, Kpprior popped up with the same edits so I blocked them per DUCK. Today, we have Kevboprior making the same edits. All users and one IP are now blocked, but I'd like to request a sleeper check to root out any others. Thanks — DoRD ( talk) 14:27, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Ask for sleepers and ye shall receive:
The user vandalized Jeff Daniels and created an attack page with the same material - the sockmaster is similarly obsessed with Daniels' article. Due to the user's claim here, I believe this to be the same person as the master and would like a sleeper check. Thanks. — DoRD ( talk) 13:47, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
First account blocked per DUCK and admitted to being a sock. Second and third accounts are suspected due to editing patterns and I have blocked the accounts. Requesting sleeper check since last check produced a lot of socks. Editor is also claiming " nearly one hundred sleepers". -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 17:22, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Since the DoRDo account was created at ACC, could we also have a block on the IP(s) he's using so that the ACC volunteers will have some warning? Thanks — DoRD ( talk) 17:28, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
Sleeper check. Alexandria (talk) 15:39, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
More of the same, i.e. obsession with Jeff Daniels and Dumb and Dumber. These are already blocked, and I know a couple of sweeps were recently run, but these just keep popping up. — DoRD ( talk) 19:43, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Looks like Courcelles ( talk · contribs) got them all. Elockid ( Talk) 23:08, 16 November 2011 (UTC)