DatBoopyGuy ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

03 April 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

• BeepBoop8664 yt ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki) (  Clerk note: original case name)

• BeepBoop8664 ytt ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • SPI Tools

Please take a look at User_talk:BeepBoop8664_yt, seemingly very strange impersonation or sock? Pavlov2 ( talk) 17:08, 3 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. @ BeepBoop8664 ytt and BeepBoop8664 yt: Pavlov2 ( talk) 17:20, 3 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Very interesting, I was wondering if that was the case with Ohok and the Dumdum account. The only purpose for the socks seems to be just wasting other editors time. I'll be keeping an eye out for these in future, as for some reason they have a special interest in me. I have a suspicion that all these accounts are actually linked to another master who I have had a run-in with before, which is why they are hassling me. Could BKFIP be behind this? Mako001  (C)   (T)  🇺🇦 22:23, 3 April 2022 (UTC) reply

I am not a BKIP expert, but from the data I've got available, I'd say they're unrelated. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:01, 3 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

•  In progress - -- RoySmith (talk) 19:52, 3 April 2022 (UTC) reply
• The following are all  Confirmed:
  • BeepBoop8664 yt ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • BeepBoop8664 ytt ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • Ohokguy4078 ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • Dumdumfumlum ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • FUKASSHET66Y ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • DatBoopyGuy ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  -- RoySmith (talk) 19:54, 3 April 2022 (UTC) reply
• This one is  Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely) but probably not worth the effort to investigate further. I'm going to move this to DatBoopyGuy.
  • Guydabestyboizz ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki) -- RoySmith (talk) 19:58, 3 April 2022 (UTC) reply
• I requested locks for the two that were unlocked. Not tagging per WP:DENY - these are obvious vandalism accounts that are going to get blocked regardless of whether anyone knows they're a sock or not. Closing. Thanks, Spicy ( talk) 01:34, 4 April 2022 (UTC) reply