From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Danrz

Danrz ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)

Prior SSP or RFCU cases may exist for this user:

Report date March 19 2010, 03:36 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by ttonyb ( talk)

Editor appears to be using sockpuppet to avoid warring block. ttonyb ( talk) 03:36, 19 March 2010 (UTC) reply


Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.

Oh please. This is obviously the work of one of you people. Barneystimpleton ( talk) 03:38, 19 March 2010 (UTC) reply

Mmmm.... I'm just a birdie, too!   NavalExpanse ( talk) 07:25, 19 March 2010 (UTC) reply
Comments by other users

Continuing the same edits in 1991; Checkuser reasons NOW evading block, formerly only evading 3RR. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 05:05, 19 March 2010 (UTC) reply

Reverts at 1991 include:

  1. 02:33 as master
  2. 02:46
  3. 02:51
  4. 02:55
  5. 03:07
  6. 03:10
  7. 03:39
    block at 04:01
  8. 04:52 as sock
  9. 04:59 as sock


Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Checkuser request – code letter: E + D (Community ban/sanction evasion and 3RR using socks)
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.

 Clerk endorsed these users look fairly likely to be socks, however, I'd prefer it if a CU could please confirm the link. Kind regards, Spitfire Tally-ho! 10:01, 19 March 2010 (UTC) reply

  • Ok. So the other account here, NavalExpanse ( talk · contribs) was shown to have been using multiple accounts as part of this check and a cursory glance shows at least some of them to be used to evade scrutiny. See here and here, for just two examples - there are others. There appear to be two distinct editors, though, at this address as there is another person using the same computer who just creates accounts with abusive names. They may or may not be the same editor. I'm assuming they're not. Most of these accounts appear to have some beef with User:Arthur Rubin.
  • The following accounts are socks of the same editor;
  • The following accounts are socks of the same editor - these appear to be just trying to make a point by having dubious usernames which continually get blocked;
- Alison 05:59, 20 March 2010 (UTC) reply
Moved to show Danrz ( talk · contribs) as the sockmaster, who seems to have the earliest registration date. Tim Song ( talk) 06:18, 20 March 2010 (UTC) reply
Conclusions

information Administrator note Blocked and tagged. Tim Song ( talk) 06:25, 20 March 2010 (UTC) reply

This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Danrz

Danrz ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)

Prior SSP or RFCU cases may exist for this user:

Report date March 19 2010, 03:36 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by ttonyb ( talk)

Editor appears to be using sockpuppet to avoid warring block. ttonyb ( talk) 03:36, 19 March 2010 (UTC) reply


Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.

Oh please. This is obviously the work of one of you people. Barneystimpleton ( talk) 03:38, 19 March 2010 (UTC) reply

Mmmm.... I'm just a birdie, too!   NavalExpanse ( talk) 07:25, 19 March 2010 (UTC) reply
Comments by other users

Continuing the same edits in 1991; Checkuser reasons NOW evading block, formerly only evading 3RR. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 05:05, 19 March 2010 (UTC) reply

Reverts at 1991 include:

  1. 02:33 as master
  2. 02:46
  3. 02:51
  4. 02:55
  5. 03:07
  6. 03:10
  7. 03:39
    block at 04:01
  8. 04:52 as sock
  9. 04:59 as sock


Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Checkuser request – code letter: E + D (Community ban/sanction evasion and 3RR using socks)
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.

 Clerk endorsed these users look fairly likely to be socks, however, I'd prefer it if a CU could please confirm the link. Kind regards, Spitfire Tally-ho! 10:01, 19 March 2010 (UTC) reply

  • Ok. So the other account here, NavalExpanse ( talk · contribs) was shown to have been using multiple accounts as part of this check and a cursory glance shows at least some of them to be used to evade scrutiny. See here and here, for just two examples - there are others. There appear to be two distinct editors, though, at this address as there is another person using the same computer who just creates accounts with abusive names. They may or may not be the same editor. I'm assuming they're not. Most of these accounts appear to have some beef with User:Arthur Rubin.
  • The following accounts are socks of the same editor;
  • The following accounts are socks of the same editor - these appear to be just trying to make a point by having dubious usernames which continually get blocked;
- Alison 05:59, 20 March 2010 (UTC) reply
Moved to show Danrz ( talk · contribs) as the sockmaster, who seems to have the earliest registration date. Tim Song ( talk) 06:18, 20 March 2010 (UTC) reply
Conclusions

information Administrator note Blocked and tagged. Tim Song ( talk) 06:25, 20 March 2010 (UTC) reply

This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook