Prior SSP or RFCU cases may exist for this user:
Editor appears to be using sockpuppet to avoid warring block. ttonyb ( talk) 03:36, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Oh please. This is obviously the work of one of you people. Barneystimpleton ( talk) 03:38, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Continuing the same edits in 1991; Checkuser reasons NOW evading block, formerly only evading 3RR. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 05:05, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Reverts at 1991 include:
Clerk endorsed these users look fairly likely to be socks, however, I'd prefer it if a CU could please confirm the link. Kind regards, Spitfire Tally-ho! 10:01, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Administrator note Blocked and tagged. Tim Song ( talk) 06:25, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
Prior SSP or RFCU cases may exist for this user:
Editor appears to be using sockpuppet to avoid warring block. ttonyb ( talk) 03:36, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Oh please. This is obviously the work of one of you people. Barneystimpleton ( talk) 03:38, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Continuing the same edits in 1991; Checkuser reasons NOW evading block, formerly only evading 3RR. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 05:05, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Reverts at 1991 include:
Clerk endorsed these users look fairly likely to be socks, however, I'd prefer it if a CU could please confirm the link. Kind regards, Spitfire Tally-ho! 10:01, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Administrator note Blocked and tagged. Tim Song ( talk) 06:25, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |