Damonthesis ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

01 May 2013

Suspected sockpuppets

• JIM MAC EGG ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

User:Damonthesis is currently engaged in several disputes [1] [2] [3]. In the process of an AfD for an article the user created, User:JIM MAC EGG voted keep, using the same rationale and grammar as Damonthesis (so, suspected WP:VOTESTACKING). A look at the contributions of Damonthesis and the log/ single contrib of JME shows a lull in Damonthesis's editing while JME was created/editing; right after the edit, Damonthesis started editing again. JME has made no edits since, and I suspect if it is really a sock will never be used again, but I'm afraid that if it is true and Damonthesis is not warned in some way about this again, they may try again in the future. I'm not requesting CU for now since 1) the AfD is still ongoing, 2) JME is not likely to be used again, and 3) I don't feel like it's needed to determine a link. Ansh 666 06:25, 1 May 2013 (UTC) reply

False and seemingly retaliatory for disputing incorrect content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Damonthesis ( talk • contribs) 17:06, 1 May 2013 (UTC) reply

I'm not involved in the content dispute at all beyond the AfD; I take those completely objectively in any case (note the other uninvolved editors' statements as well). If anything, it's your behavior that made me file this SPI, not any petty content dispute; if it hadn't been so bad, maybe I would have let it go. Ansh 666 18:42, 1 May 2013 (UTC) reply

Note: Damonthesis has been blocked for other violations. Ansh 666 20:30, 1 May 2013 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

• CheckUser requested - Self-endorsed by clerk for checkuser attention - Requesting checkuser as per the evidence provided. JIM MAC EGG might be a sockpuppet or a canvassed user. Reaper Eternal ( talk) 21:00, 1 May 2013 (UTC) reply
•  Unrelated, but Damonthesis has created several sleeper accounts: TemperLocke ( talk · contribs), Valentine Baggins ( talk · contribs), and Pete Dalton ( talk · contribs). I mentioned these users because there are also edits from an IP (a fair amount). It doesn't seem the user is trying to evade scrutiny that way, but it effectively is doing so. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 21:43, 1 May 2013 (UTC) reply
• Sleepers blocked, JIM MAC EGG was probably canvassed or something, closing. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:11, 1 May 2013 (UTC) reply

19 January 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

• Lazraegrailf ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Sock Lazraegrailf admits to being a sock of the blocked master here. -- Drm310 🍁 ( talk) 15:31, 19 January 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

•  Note: Damonthesis was blocked on 15 September and the CheckUser window has probably closed as a result, unless they've logged in since. Sdrqaz ( talk) 15:44, 19 January 2022 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

• CU  Clerk declined - previous accounts are stale.  Awaiting administrative action - given the admission of block evasion, please indef the sock. Thanks, Spicy ( talk) 18:26, 19 January 2022 (UTC) reply
•  Blocked and tagged, closing. -- Blablubbs ( talk) 20:11, 20 January 2022 (UTC) reply