Home • Search • Translate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Chutrandi

Chutrandi ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

28 December 2017

Suspected sockpuppets


5 edits, 2 of which concerned saving the article created by Rashkeqamar [1] [2] from AfD. [3] [4] Raymond3023 ( talk) 16:28, 28 December 2017 (UTC) Raymond3023 ( talk) 16:28, 28 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This case is being reviewed by Sir Sputnik as part of the clerk training process. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on their Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.

01 April 2018

Suspected sockpuppets


  • Name resembles one of the blocked editor of this sock farm, Rehmanbarua.
  • Creation of articles about Hindi film actress. [9] [10]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

29 December 2018

Suspected sockpuppets


Silently violates WP:OVERKILL on articles like Rashkeqamar.

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

15 June 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

See below. Bbb23 ( talk) 00:43, 15 June 2019 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

11 September 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

User made some minor edits to articles to get autoconfirmed, then recreated the article Indica (Pranay Lal) with wording that is suspiciously similar to that used in the deleted version of the article by User:Shamabopanna (previously blocked as sockpuppet of User:Chutrandi). ... discospinster talk 18:16, 11 September 2019 (UTC) reply


@Discospinster :How am I included here? I am new to wikipedia. I was curious to know how to become auto-confirmed user, to create a page. I have read the book and I know the author. I can cite many reliable references. also I have knowledge on Evolution by Natural Selection, so just to contribute in a positive way .-- Sysnoperaq ( talk) 13:37, 12 September 2019 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 In progress. I'm not going to be able to finish this tonight. Too many socks, and it's too late for me. Hopefully tomorrow.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 02:21, 12 September 2019 (UTC) reply

07 February 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

Recreation of Pranay Lal, previously created by Sysnoperaq who appears to be one of many, many puppets of this user. Hug syrup 10:06, 7 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This case is being reviewed by JJMC89 as part of the clerk training process. Please allow him to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on his talk page or on this page if more appropriate.

24 February 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

Has recreated at least two articles previously created and deleted under new names: N.V.S. Reddy under Nallamilli Venkat Satyanarayan Reddy and Indica (Pranay Lal) under Indica : A Deep Natural History of the Indian Subcontinent. Pretty clear case of WP:DUCK, especially how closely together both of the articles were created time-wise. The main reason why I have requested CU is to find and root out any sleeper accounts. GPL93 ( talk) 15:47, 24 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

@ 1997kB:, I have tagged the sock's creations per G5 and reverted all of the sock's edits. Admins, please indef per WP:DUCK. -- Java Hurricane 17:11, 25 February 2020 (UTC) reply

@ 1997kB:, could you please globally rename the master for Indo-Aryan expletives per the user below? -- Java Hurricane 03:29, 26 February 2020 (UTC) reply

@ JavaHurricane: I am aware of this expletive username, but I don't thing we should go for a rename. User is already blocked and renaming will just create extra work of tagging and moving this case. Plus there's no practice of renaming expletive account other than they are not targetting specific user, in such cases accounts are generally hidden by stewards. ‐‐ 1997kB ( talk) 07:26, 26 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

07 June 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

More Indica spam, now as Indica (2016 book) Praxidicae ( talk) 12:39, 7 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This case is being reviewed by Creffett as part of the clerk training process. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on their Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.

  • Between fairly strong technical evidence and some behavioral overlap, I'm blocking RobinSingh90 as well, I'm convinced they're part of the same sockfarm.  Blocked without tags, closing. creffett ( talk) 12:58, 9 June 2020 (UTC) reply

07 February 2021

Suspected sockpuppets


Sleeper sock created last year and activated after the last SPI.

  Sounds like a duck quacking into a megaphone to me. See: [27] [28]

Updating Bhakti Rathod, [29] which he created through previous sock. [30]

Updating Patna#Smart city section. [31] [32]

Updating 'personal life' section on Akbaruddin Owaisi. [33] [34]

This needs to be checkusered because this user has always got numerous socks and sleepers. Raymond3023 ( talk) 07:51, 7 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

06 March 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Eager to edit war to restore a section [37] [38] that a sock of this sock farm was similarly restoring, [39] [40] after writing it. Aman Kumar Goel ( Talk) 11:03, 6 March 2021 (UTC) reply

@ AmandaNP: I discovered after this SPI that TheCherryPanda is clearly guilty of socking through IP addresses. Can you check that? Compare these edits on same pages:
[41] and [42]
[43] and [44]
[45] and [46]
Aman Kumar Goel ( Talk) 18:27, 11 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

23 May 2021

Suspected sockpuppets


Jirdawanasingh is same name as other blocked socks Debanjanasingh, Alanahasingh of this sock master. Adding same content [47] [48] but on a different page this time to avoid detection.

Nastrack87 is obviously Jirdawanasingh. [49] [50]   Looks like a duck to me.

Request checkuser for sleepers and other socks. Aman Kumar Goel ( Talk) 05:05, 23 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • I think the second diff here was meant to be [51].  Clerk endorsed - this seems highly plausible to me, endorsing due to the inordinate number of sleepers previously discovered in this case. Also noting that I've set |deny=yes per our handling of previous cases. -- Blablubbs| talk 10:00, 23 May 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Nastrack87 is  Unlikely to Jirdawanasingh and friends.
    Jirdawanasingh is on the same range as Chutrandi and I just blocked ~30 socks from them. TonyBallioni ( talk) 18:40, 23 May 2021 (UTC) reply
  • I'm surprised at the CU result – I'll leave that one alone given the fact that it seems to be a throwaway. Please re-report if anything else surfaces in the future, and we can revisit them then. Closing. -- Blablubbs| talk 18:57, 23 May 2021 (UTC) reply

11 July 2021

Suspected sockpuppets


@ Blablubbs and TonyBallioni: Obviously a sock. But seems to be belonging to this sock farm with the same edits as earlier socks, i.e. creating new section on Hindutva, [52] [53] and sourcing on Hindu nationalism. [54] [55] LearnIndology ( talk) 06:34, 11 July 2021 (UTC) reply

@ Oshwah: But then who's sock Shahinshah121 is? Account created in 2018 and made first edits this month like he is editing for years. Clearly a sleeper sock. LearnIndology ( talk) 06:05, 14 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

27 July 2021

Suspected sockpuppets


Restoring edits of earlier blocked sock [56] and [57], and carrying on habitual WP:OVERCITE. [58] [59] Raymond3023 ( talk) 03:12, 27 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

04 April 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Restored edits on Oindrila Sen originally made by Chutrandi sock Ritabharidevi ( talk · contribs) Bensci54 ( talk) 17:11, 4 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

22 October 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Focused on the same article with same type of content. [60] [61] [62]

Requested CU because this person socks with many accounts at a time. Azuredivay ( talk) 09:10, 22 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Chutrandi/Archive&oldid=1119118472"
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Chutrandi

Chutrandi ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

28 December 2017

Suspected sockpuppets


5 edits, 2 of which concerned saving the article created by Rashkeqamar [1] [2] from AfD. [3] [4] Raymond3023 ( talk) 16:28, 28 December 2017 (UTC) Raymond3023 ( talk) 16:28, 28 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This case is being reviewed by Sir Sputnik as part of the clerk training process. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on their Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.

01 April 2018

Suspected sockpuppets


  • Name resembles one of the blocked editor of this sock farm, Rehmanbarua.
  • Creation of articles about Hindi film actress. [9] [10]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

29 December 2018

Suspected sockpuppets


Silently violates WP:OVERKILL on articles like Rashkeqamar.

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

15 June 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

See below. Bbb23 ( talk) 00:43, 15 June 2019 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

11 September 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

User made some minor edits to articles to get autoconfirmed, then recreated the article Indica (Pranay Lal) with wording that is suspiciously similar to that used in the deleted version of the article by User:Shamabopanna (previously blocked as sockpuppet of User:Chutrandi). ... discospinster talk 18:16, 11 September 2019 (UTC) reply


@Discospinster :How am I included here? I am new to wikipedia. I was curious to know how to become auto-confirmed user, to create a page. I have read the book and I know the author. I can cite many reliable references. also I have knowledge on Evolution by Natural Selection, so just to contribute in a positive way .-- Sysnoperaq ( talk) 13:37, 12 September 2019 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 In progress. I'm not going to be able to finish this tonight. Too many socks, and it's too late for me. Hopefully tomorrow.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 02:21, 12 September 2019 (UTC) reply

07 February 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

Recreation of Pranay Lal, previously created by Sysnoperaq who appears to be one of many, many puppets of this user. Hug syrup 10:06, 7 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This case is being reviewed by JJMC89 as part of the clerk training process. Please allow him to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on his talk page or on this page if more appropriate.

24 February 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

Has recreated at least two articles previously created and deleted under new names: N.V.S. Reddy under Nallamilli Venkat Satyanarayan Reddy and Indica (Pranay Lal) under Indica : A Deep Natural History of the Indian Subcontinent. Pretty clear case of WP:DUCK, especially how closely together both of the articles were created time-wise. The main reason why I have requested CU is to find and root out any sleeper accounts. GPL93 ( talk) 15:47, 24 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

@ 1997kB:, I have tagged the sock's creations per G5 and reverted all of the sock's edits. Admins, please indef per WP:DUCK. -- Java Hurricane 17:11, 25 February 2020 (UTC) reply

@ 1997kB:, could you please globally rename the master for Indo-Aryan expletives per the user below? -- Java Hurricane 03:29, 26 February 2020 (UTC) reply

@ JavaHurricane: I am aware of this expletive username, but I don't thing we should go for a rename. User is already blocked and renaming will just create extra work of tagging and moving this case. Plus there's no practice of renaming expletive account other than they are not targetting specific user, in such cases accounts are generally hidden by stewards. ‐‐ 1997kB ( talk) 07:26, 26 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

07 June 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

More Indica spam, now as Indica (2016 book) Praxidicae ( talk) 12:39, 7 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This case is being reviewed by Creffett as part of the clerk training process. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on their Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.

  • Between fairly strong technical evidence and some behavioral overlap, I'm blocking RobinSingh90 as well, I'm convinced they're part of the same sockfarm.  Blocked without tags, closing. creffett ( talk) 12:58, 9 June 2020 (UTC) reply

07 February 2021

Suspected sockpuppets


Sleeper sock created last year and activated after the last SPI.

  Sounds like a duck quacking into a megaphone to me. See: [27] [28]

Updating Bhakti Rathod, [29] which he created through previous sock. [30]

Updating Patna#Smart city section. [31] [32]

Updating 'personal life' section on Akbaruddin Owaisi. [33] [34]

This needs to be checkusered because this user has always got numerous socks and sleepers. Raymond3023 ( talk) 07:51, 7 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

06 March 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Eager to edit war to restore a section [37] [38] that a sock of this sock farm was similarly restoring, [39] [40] after writing it. Aman Kumar Goel ( Talk) 11:03, 6 March 2021 (UTC) reply

@ AmandaNP: I discovered after this SPI that TheCherryPanda is clearly guilty of socking through IP addresses. Can you check that? Compare these edits on same pages:
[41] and [42]
[43] and [44]
[45] and [46]
Aman Kumar Goel ( Talk) 18:27, 11 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

23 May 2021

Suspected sockpuppets


Jirdawanasingh is same name as other blocked socks Debanjanasingh, Alanahasingh of this sock master. Adding same content [47] [48] but on a different page this time to avoid detection.

Nastrack87 is obviously Jirdawanasingh. [49] [50]   Looks like a duck to me.

Request checkuser for sleepers and other socks. Aman Kumar Goel ( Talk) 05:05, 23 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • I think the second diff here was meant to be [51].  Clerk endorsed - this seems highly plausible to me, endorsing due to the inordinate number of sleepers previously discovered in this case. Also noting that I've set |deny=yes per our handling of previous cases. -- Blablubbs| talk 10:00, 23 May 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Nastrack87 is  Unlikely to Jirdawanasingh and friends.
    Jirdawanasingh is on the same range as Chutrandi and I just blocked ~30 socks from them. TonyBallioni ( talk) 18:40, 23 May 2021 (UTC) reply
  • I'm surprised at the CU result – I'll leave that one alone given the fact that it seems to be a throwaway. Please re-report if anything else surfaces in the future, and we can revisit them then. Closing. -- Blablubbs| talk 18:57, 23 May 2021 (UTC) reply

11 July 2021

Suspected sockpuppets


@ Blablubbs and TonyBallioni: Obviously a sock. But seems to be belonging to this sock farm with the same edits as earlier socks, i.e. creating new section on Hindutva, [52] [53] and sourcing on Hindu nationalism. [54] [55] LearnIndology ( talk) 06:34, 11 July 2021 (UTC) reply

@ Oshwah: But then who's sock Shahinshah121 is? Account created in 2018 and made first edits this month like he is editing for years. Clearly a sleeper sock. LearnIndology ( talk) 06:05, 14 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

27 July 2021

Suspected sockpuppets


Restoring edits of earlier blocked sock [56] and [57], and carrying on habitual WP:OVERCITE. [58] [59] Raymond3023 ( talk) 03:12, 27 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

04 April 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Restored edits on Oindrila Sen originally made by Chutrandi sock Ritabharidevi ( talk · contribs) Bensci54 ( talk) 17:11, 4 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

22 October 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Focused on the same article with same type of content. [60] [61] [62]

Requested CU because this person socks with many accounts at a time. Azuredivay ( talk) 09:10, 22 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Chutrandi/Archive&oldid=1119118472"

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook




Top Of Page

Home • Search • Translate

© CSE