Home • Search • Translate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Categorica

Categorica ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

12 December 2016

Suspected sockpuppets


User:Hum Hum is a relatively new user whose first edits were to comment at Talk:Czech Republic regarding support for the usage of "Czechia": [1]. User:Snowsuit Wearer posted similar contents on same talk page, also in support of using "Czechia": [2]. User:Snowsuit Wearer has most recently been involved in a dispute at Wikipedia talk:Glossary. User:Hum Hum has posted at an RfC in favor of the minority position advanced by User:Snowsuit Wearer, raising the possibility of vote stacking through a sockpuppet: [3]. Is it coincidence that Hum Hum has only written on talk pages when supporting positions advanced by User:Snowsuit Wearer? Also, User:Hum Hum has only made a handful of edits. It's unlikely that a user's first edits would be on an article talk page and on Wikipedia talk:Glossary. Good Ol’factory (talk) 08:42, 12 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

14 January 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

Editing in similar topics from the sockmaster, and has contributed to discussions that the master has [4]. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 23:45, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

We don't publicly disclose the IP(s) of named accounts. CU declined.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 23:53, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply


15 January 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

Editing behaviour on [5] Bandy related articles is similar to the sockmaster. All topics edited on are exclusively bandy related. Also, it seems a bit suspicious for a new account to jump into ANI [6]. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 00:44, 15 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

15 June 2018

Suspected sockpuppets


Besides the bandy related interests as the sockmaster, reverts an edit (that the sockmaster added) to the article bandy. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 14:03, 15 June 2018 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

16 June 2018

Suspected sockpuppets


Another sock who is reverting to their preferred version on the article bandy. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 22:31, 16 June 2018 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

11 October 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

Repeated insertion of removed content from the article bandy by previous socks of the master account. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 04:15, 11 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

@ Bbb23 I find it odd that an ip\s first edit is to revert a large chunk of text by the former sock. The behaviour by both is the same. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 17:18, 11 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Red X Unrelated.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 13:05, 11 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Closing.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 23:23, 21 October 2018 (UTC) reply

21 October 2018

Suspected sockpuppets


Dormant account since 2016 returns to revert edits on the article bandy which the sockmaster (and socks) have been reverting too. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 22:55, 21 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

This is so strange! Sportsfan 1234 is likely only making these accusations because he/she doesn't like to be opposed in his/her views when he/she is erasing information which is fully referenced by a number of outside sources. Boink v. S. ( talk) 06:05, 22 October 2018 (UTC) reply

@ Bbb23 What are the next steps here? Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 13:41, 22 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Unusual results.  Possible.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 23:22, 21 October 2018 (UTC) reply

@ Sportsfan 1234: Someone else will look at the report and decide what action to take.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 13:47, 22 October 2018 (UTC) reply

22 November 2020

Suspected sockpuppets


Same edit removals on the article Bandy done by previous socks. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 03:59, 22 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Additional information needed. In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
  1. At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
  2. At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
  3. In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:32, 30 November 2020 (UTC) reply

30 August 2021

Suspected sockpuppets


New user; editing primarily on the topics that the master and socks edited on, in particular the bandy article, in which they keep insisting the article looks like the preferred version of the sockmaster. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 00:32, 30 August 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

04 December 2021

Suspected sockpuppets


User adding the same content other socks were adding to the article bandy. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 21:47, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

For ex: Suspected sock is removing parts of the lead, that other socks were blocked for [7]. Talk page discussion with multiple socks in 2018 [8]. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 16:04, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply
And again [9] Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 17:13, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Red X Unrelated on the technical data. I will reveal that both this account and the one I compared to geolocate to countries where winter sports are popular, so shared interest is not a surprise. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:46, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Categorica/Archive&oldid=1076201961"
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Categorica

Categorica ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

12 December 2016

Suspected sockpuppets


User:Hum Hum is a relatively new user whose first edits were to comment at Talk:Czech Republic regarding support for the usage of "Czechia": [1]. User:Snowsuit Wearer posted similar contents on same talk page, also in support of using "Czechia": [2]. User:Snowsuit Wearer has most recently been involved in a dispute at Wikipedia talk:Glossary. User:Hum Hum has posted at an RfC in favor of the minority position advanced by User:Snowsuit Wearer, raising the possibility of vote stacking through a sockpuppet: [3]. Is it coincidence that Hum Hum has only written on talk pages when supporting positions advanced by User:Snowsuit Wearer? Also, User:Hum Hum has only made a handful of edits. It's unlikely that a user's first edits would be on an article talk page and on Wikipedia talk:Glossary. Good Ol’factory (talk) 08:42, 12 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

14 January 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

Editing in similar topics from the sockmaster, and has contributed to discussions that the master has [4]. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 23:45, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

We don't publicly disclose the IP(s) of named accounts. CU declined.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 23:53, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply


15 January 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

Editing behaviour on [5] Bandy related articles is similar to the sockmaster. All topics edited on are exclusively bandy related. Also, it seems a bit suspicious for a new account to jump into ANI [6]. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 00:44, 15 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

15 June 2018

Suspected sockpuppets


Besides the bandy related interests as the sockmaster, reverts an edit (that the sockmaster added) to the article bandy. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 14:03, 15 June 2018 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

16 June 2018

Suspected sockpuppets


Another sock who is reverting to their preferred version on the article bandy. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 22:31, 16 June 2018 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

11 October 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

Repeated insertion of removed content from the article bandy by previous socks of the master account. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 04:15, 11 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

@ Bbb23 I find it odd that an ip\s first edit is to revert a large chunk of text by the former sock. The behaviour by both is the same. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 17:18, 11 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Red X Unrelated.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 13:05, 11 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Closing.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 23:23, 21 October 2018 (UTC) reply

21 October 2018

Suspected sockpuppets


Dormant account since 2016 returns to revert edits on the article bandy which the sockmaster (and socks) have been reverting too. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 22:55, 21 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

This is so strange! Sportsfan 1234 is likely only making these accusations because he/she doesn't like to be opposed in his/her views when he/she is erasing information which is fully referenced by a number of outside sources. Boink v. S. ( talk) 06:05, 22 October 2018 (UTC) reply

@ Bbb23 What are the next steps here? Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 13:41, 22 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Unusual results.  Possible.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 23:22, 21 October 2018 (UTC) reply

@ Sportsfan 1234: Someone else will look at the report and decide what action to take.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 13:47, 22 October 2018 (UTC) reply

22 November 2020

Suspected sockpuppets


Same edit removals on the article Bandy done by previous socks. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 03:59, 22 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Additional information needed. In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
  1. At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
  2. At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
  3. In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:32, 30 November 2020 (UTC) reply

30 August 2021

Suspected sockpuppets


New user; editing primarily on the topics that the master and socks edited on, in particular the bandy article, in which they keep insisting the article looks like the preferred version of the sockmaster. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 00:32, 30 August 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

04 December 2021

Suspected sockpuppets


User adding the same content other socks were adding to the article bandy. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 21:47, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

For ex: Suspected sock is removing parts of the lead, that other socks were blocked for [7]. Talk page discussion with multiple socks in 2018 [8]. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 16:04, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply
And again [9] Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 17:13, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Red X Unrelated on the technical data. I will reveal that both this account and the one I compared to geolocate to countries where winter sports are popular, so shared interest is not a surprise. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:46, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Categorica/Archive&oldid=1076201961"

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook




Top Of Page

Home • Search • Translate

© CSE