From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Report date May 12 2010, 16:42 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets
Evidence submitted by Kugao

On 26 April 2010 User:66.92.162.231 placed PROD tag on the article Brick Conners. This PROD was contested on 3 May 2010.

1: User:Canals86966 - Opens account 3 May 2010 and made first accout edit [1] to PROD the article Brick Conners. Like the other accounts, this editor created both talk and user page using his signature only. This single purpose account has been involved in the following AfDs:

2: User:Facet62 - Opens account on 5 May 2010 and made first accout edit [2] to 2nd the PROD for article Brick Conners. Like the other accounts, this editor created both talk and user page using his signature only. This single purpose account has been involved in the following AfDs:

3: User:Kylix8 - Opens account on 6 May 2010 and made first accout edits [3] to add ‘’fact” tags to the article Brick Conners. Like the other accounts, this editor created both talk and user page using his signature only. This single purpose account has been involved in the following AfDs:

4. User:166.137.10.83 made first edits [4] [5] on 10 May 2010 to the talk page and AfD for the article Brick Conners. This single purpose account has been involved in the following AfDs:

The following have also been added to the list of suspects due to their previously disruptive edits to the same article Brick Conners:

User:Hogula (see edit [6])
User:70.151.53.66 (see edit [7])
User:75.82.25.244 (see edit [8])
User:66.92.162.231 (see edit [9])
User: 99.17.217.237 who made an unconstructive edit to this page (see edit [10]
Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 Clerk note: This looks more like WP:MEAT than anything else, as the IPs are all over the United States. I highly doubt actual socking here. – MuZemike 01:21, 22 May 2010 (UTC) reply

I agree with Muzemike here. I see little evidence of actual socking. I might recommend taking up the meatpuppetry issues at WP:AN/I. Tiptoety talk 04:29, 23 May 2010 (UTC) reply
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Report date May 12 2010, 16:42 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets
Evidence submitted by Kugao

On 26 April 2010 User:66.92.162.231 placed PROD tag on the article Brick Conners. This PROD was contested on 3 May 2010.

1: User:Canals86966 - Opens account 3 May 2010 and made first accout edit [1] to PROD the article Brick Conners. Like the other accounts, this editor created both talk and user page using his signature only. This single purpose account has been involved in the following AfDs:

2: User:Facet62 - Opens account on 5 May 2010 and made first accout edit [2] to 2nd the PROD for article Brick Conners. Like the other accounts, this editor created both talk and user page using his signature only. This single purpose account has been involved in the following AfDs:

3: User:Kylix8 - Opens account on 6 May 2010 and made first accout edits [3] to add ‘’fact” tags to the article Brick Conners. Like the other accounts, this editor created both talk and user page using his signature only. This single purpose account has been involved in the following AfDs:

4. User:166.137.10.83 made first edits [4] [5] on 10 May 2010 to the talk page and AfD for the article Brick Conners. This single purpose account has been involved in the following AfDs:

The following have also been added to the list of suspects due to their previously disruptive edits to the same article Brick Conners:

User:Hogula (see edit [6])
User:70.151.53.66 (see edit [7])
User:75.82.25.244 (see edit [8])
User:66.92.162.231 (see edit [9])
User: 99.17.217.237 who made an unconstructive edit to this page (see edit [10]
Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 Clerk note: This looks more like WP:MEAT than anything else, as the IPs are all over the United States. I highly doubt actual socking here. – MuZemike 01:21, 22 May 2010 (UTC) reply

I agree with Muzemike here. I see little evidence of actual socking. I might recommend taking up the meatpuppetry issues at WP:AN/I. Tiptoety talk 04:29, 23 May 2010 (UTC) reply
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook