Bhushanbush82 ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

15 March 2012

Suspected sockpuppets

• Subhashbhosle55 ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Both users started within a very short time of each other and edit Shivaji almost exclusively, removing evidence of Rajput ancestry. They have removed the same chunks of text first set: [1] [2], second set: [3] [4]. And at User:Dbkasar, the user Bhushanbush82 writes: "Discuss before making changes...My Self ( Bhushan Pawar ) , Subhash Bhosale , Shailesh Chavan etc etc have had extensive discussions on this issue .....see the archive of discussions , The final consensus was evolved after a lot of debate...you cant just come and type YOUR point of view.. and we will not allow you to.........." which look more like personal names than user names. JanetteDoe ( talk) 21:27, 15 March 2012 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Hii ,

I have been using only one legitimate account - bhushanbush82 ; I have never sought to distort facts ( rather initiated a healthy discussion ) . I tried to state the other point of view also . Claims made some authors should not be taken as FACT , but it should be clearly enunciated as claims made by so and so author. I believe this is as per Wikipedias policy of Neutrality.

thanks , bhushanbush

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

•  Confirmed - Tiptoety ^talk 07:05, 16 March 2012 (UTC) reply
•  Administrator note B/T. T. Canens ( talk) 03:06, 18 March 2012 (UTC) reply