From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Banana19208

Banana19208 ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)

18 March 2019

Suspected sockpuppets


  • Same odd fascination with PERM (Ext Confirmed) and RFPP
  • Same poor command of English - the 'tortured' English is almost identical
  • Macropedia account created after Banana19208 is blocked
  • Large article editing overlap on unlikely topics in relatively small history - [1] Begoon 06:39, 18 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This case is being reviewed by Cabayi as part of the clerk training process. Please allow Cabayi to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on Cabayi's Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.

Pink clock Awaiting administrative action The behavioural evidence is compelling. Please indef the sock. Cabayi ( talk) 07:37, 18 March 2019 (UTC) reply

  • Decided to do a follow up check, and include more for the record  Confirmed:
-- Amanda (aka DQ) 09:49, 18 March 2019 (UTC) reply
Macropedia blocked not tagged. ~ GB fan 11:36, 18 March 2019 (UTC) reply
All tagged. Closing. Cabayi ( talk) 12:09, 18 March 2019 (UTC) reply


18 March 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

Immediately after the last 'pedia account is blocked, this one pops up on the same articles. Praxidicae ( talk) 15:11, 18 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This case is being reviewed by 1997kB as part of the clerk training process. Please allow him to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on his Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.


22 March 2019

Suspected sockpuppets


Pretty obvious 'duck' comparing to contribs/behaviour of very recent previous socks. Requesting CU to check for 'sleepers'. Thank you. Begoon 03:23, 22 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


24 March 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

Sorry, I know you only just closed this, but I feel compelled to introduce you to Born2Local, who seems... eerily familiar... Begoon 10:36, 24 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Born2Local changed name to AngurisCaptain shortly after the case was filed. Cabayi ( talk) 12:10, 24 March 2019 (UTC) reply

I wasn't sure whether to add this here or open a new case, sorry. Obvious duck. -- Begoon 23:27, 25 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This case is being reviewed by Cabayi as part of the clerk training process. Please allow Cabayi to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on Cabayi's Talk page or on this page if more appropriate. Cabayi ( talk) 12:24, 24 March 2019 (UTC) reply


27 March 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

See Howard Stupp, yet again. Praxidicae ( talk) 12:22, 27 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


31 March 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

More obvious ducks. Requesting CU to check for 'sleepers' as in previous cases. Begoon 14:05, 31 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

  • I really don't see how those are socks. If they are though, can we start up an LTA page for him? Rockstone talk to me! 07:13, 1 April 2019 (UTC) reply
    The intersection in article edits on unlikely topics with previous socks in such a small number of edits and the trademark 'broken Engish' is unmistakable to anyone familiar with this user. I would be astonished if I'm wrong, but I guess it's possible. -- Begoon 11:18, 1 April 2019 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Banana19208

Banana19208 ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)

18 March 2019

Suspected sockpuppets


  • Same odd fascination with PERM (Ext Confirmed) and RFPP
  • Same poor command of English - the 'tortured' English is almost identical
  • Macropedia account created after Banana19208 is blocked
  • Large article editing overlap on unlikely topics in relatively small history - [1] Begoon 06:39, 18 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This case is being reviewed by Cabayi as part of the clerk training process. Please allow Cabayi to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on Cabayi's Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.

Pink clock Awaiting administrative action The behavioural evidence is compelling. Please indef the sock. Cabayi ( talk) 07:37, 18 March 2019 (UTC) reply

  • Decided to do a follow up check, and include more for the record  Confirmed:
-- Amanda (aka DQ) 09:49, 18 March 2019 (UTC) reply
Macropedia blocked not tagged. ~ GB fan 11:36, 18 March 2019 (UTC) reply
All tagged. Closing. Cabayi ( talk) 12:09, 18 March 2019 (UTC) reply


18 March 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

Immediately after the last 'pedia account is blocked, this one pops up on the same articles. Praxidicae ( talk) 15:11, 18 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This case is being reviewed by 1997kB as part of the clerk training process. Please allow him to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on his Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.


22 March 2019

Suspected sockpuppets


Pretty obvious 'duck' comparing to contribs/behaviour of very recent previous socks. Requesting CU to check for 'sleepers'. Thank you. Begoon 03:23, 22 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


24 March 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

Sorry, I know you only just closed this, but I feel compelled to introduce you to Born2Local, who seems... eerily familiar... Begoon 10:36, 24 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Born2Local changed name to AngurisCaptain shortly after the case was filed. Cabayi ( talk) 12:10, 24 March 2019 (UTC) reply

I wasn't sure whether to add this here or open a new case, sorry. Obvious duck. -- Begoon 23:27, 25 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This case is being reviewed by Cabayi as part of the clerk training process. Please allow Cabayi to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on Cabayi's Talk page or on this page if more appropriate. Cabayi ( talk) 12:24, 24 March 2019 (UTC) reply


27 March 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

See Howard Stupp, yet again. Praxidicae ( talk) 12:22, 27 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


31 March 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

More obvious ducks. Requesting CU to check for 'sleepers' as in previous cases. Begoon 14:05, 31 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

  • I really don't see how those are socks. If they are though, can we start up an LTA page for him? Rockstone talk to me! 07:13, 1 April 2019 (UTC) reply
    The intersection in article edits on unlikely topics with previous socks in such a small number of edits and the trademark 'broken Engish' is unmistakable to anyone familiar with this user. I would be astonished if I'm wrong, but I guess it's possible. -- Begoon 11:18, 1 April 2019 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments



Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook