From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Alibarzanjilo

Alibarzanjilo ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)

08 April 2021

Suspected sockpuppets


All of these accounts have almost solely edited pages related to the Roper family, mostly within the last few days. All of them have used essentially the same modus operandi - large content removals, removal of wikilinks, etc., with some variation in the edit summary of "delete tags, promotion", "promotion to the Roper-Curzon family", or such. The (possible) original editor claimed in an edit summary Special:Diff/1016563608 to have been an undisclosed paid editor ("The family previously paid me to edit their page in their favor. Everything is promotion").

At Baron Teynham:

  • Special:Diff/1016203637 user Historymix prods the page with the only rationale "promotional page" on 5 April
  • Special:Diff/1016358671 user Castamour, removing wikilinks with the summary "Delete tags, promotion" on 6 April
  • Special:Diff/1016518542 user Everastromanof removes wikilinks and some content with the summary "It is promotion to the Roper-Curzon family" on 7 April
  • Special:Diff/1016563608 user Everastromanof again removes the material, while claiming to have been a paid editor

At Marsala wine:

  • Special:Diff/1016388902 user Castamour, removing wikilinks with the summary "Delete tags, promotion" on 6 April
  • Special:Diff/1016574697 user Mikael Rosandi, removing wikilinks and content "Eliminate promotion to the Roper-Curzon family." on 7 April

At John Roper, 1st Baron Teynham:

  • Special:Diff/1016366654 user Castamour, removing wikilinks with the summary "Delete tags, promotion" on 6 April
  • Special:Diff/1016527895 user Darkxenoverse, removing wikilinks with the summary "Delete tags. It is promotion to the Roper-Curzon family." on 7 April

At Christopher Roper, 2nd Baron Teynham:

  • Special:Diff/1016368634 user Castamour, removing wikilinks with the summary "Delete tags, promotion" on 6 April
  • Special:Diff/1016530704 user JCarl82, removing wikilinks with the summary "Eliminate promotion to the Roper-Curzon family." on 7 April

At Christopher Roper-Curzon, 19th Baron Teynham:

  • Special:Diff/1016374854 user Castamour, removing wikilinks with the summary "Delete tags, promotion" on 6 April
  • Special:Diff/1016538658 user Placetodo, removed wikilinks and large amounts of content with summary "Eliminate promotion to the Roper-Curzon family." on 7 April

At Pylewell Park:

  • Special:Diff/1016384073 user Castamour, removing wikilinks with the summary "Delete tags, promotion" on 6 April
  • Special:Diff/1016562784 user Ancestralgirl, removing wikilinks and content with the summary "Eliminate promotion to the Roper-Curzon family." on 7 April

At William Compton, 6th Marquess of Northampton:

  • Special:Diff/1016388424 user Castamour, removing wikilinks with the summary "Delete tags, promotion" on 6 April
  • Special:Diff/1016573506 user Thewolfinthesky, removing wikilinks and content with the summary "Eliminate promotion to the Roper-Curzon family." on 7 April

At Whitaker family:

  • Special:Diff/1016386972 user Castamour, removing wikilinks with the summary "Delete tags, promotion" on 6 April
  • Special:Diff/1016565532 user Historymix, removing wikilinks and content with the summary "Eliminate promotion to the Roper-Curzon family." on 7 April

I may have missed a few socks, but I think the links above are very suggestive of a sock farm of some sort. PohranicniStraze ( talk) 00:15, 8 April 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Also found and  Confirmed:
Vintagedice ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)
Alibarzanjilo ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)
Kennet Zim ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)
Diego de Romay ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)
Andyrussx ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)
 Likely:
Historymix ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)
~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 01:47, 9 April 2021 (UTC) reply

24 April 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Per an email request to the functionaries' mailing list, I checked this account against the previously blocked accounts editing Hanna Jaff, which all seem to land under this case. Please see below. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 13:22, 24 April 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

-- Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 13:22, 24 April 2021 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Alibarzanjilo

Alibarzanjilo ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)

08 April 2021

Suspected sockpuppets


All of these accounts have almost solely edited pages related to the Roper family, mostly within the last few days. All of them have used essentially the same modus operandi - large content removals, removal of wikilinks, etc., with some variation in the edit summary of "delete tags, promotion", "promotion to the Roper-Curzon family", or such. The (possible) original editor claimed in an edit summary Special:Diff/1016563608 to have been an undisclosed paid editor ("The family previously paid me to edit their page in their favor. Everything is promotion").

At Baron Teynham:

  • Special:Diff/1016203637 user Historymix prods the page with the only rationale "promotional page" on 5 April
  • Special:Diff/1016358671 user Castamour, removing wikilinks with the summary "Delete tags, promotion" on 6 April
  • Special:Diff/1016518542 user Everastromanof removes wikilinks and some content with the summary "It is promotion to the Roper-Curzon family" on 7 April
  • Special:Diff/1016563608 user Everastromanof again removes the material, while claiming to have been a paid editor

At Marsala wine:

  • Special:Diff/1016388902 user Castamour, removing wikilinks with the summary "Delete tags, promotion" on 6 April
  • Special:Diff/1016574697 user Mikael Rosandi, removing wikilinks and content "Eliminate promotion to the Roper-Curzon family." on 7 April

At John Roper, 1st Baron Teynham:

  • Special:Diff/1016366654 user Castamour, removing wikilinks with the summary "Delete tags, promotion" on 6 April
  • Special:Diff/1016527895 user Darkxenoverse, removing wikilinks with the summary "Delete tags. It is promotion to the Roper-Curzon family." on 7 April

At Christopher Roper, 2nd Baron Teynham:

  • Special:Diff/1016368634 user Castamour, removing wikilinks with the summary "Delete tags, promotion" on 6 April
  • Special:Diff/1016530704 user JCarl82, removing wikilinks with the summary "Eliminate promotion to the Roper-Curzon family." on 7 April

At Christopher Roper-Curzon, 19th Baron Teynham:

  • Special:Diff/1016374854 user Castamour, removing wikilinks with the summary "Delete tags, promotion" on 6 April
  • Special:Diff/1016538658 user Placetodo, removed wikilinks and large amounts of content with summary "Eliminate promotion to the Roper-Curzon family." on 7 April

At Pylewell Park:

  • Special:Diff/1016384073 user Castamour, removing wikilinks with the summary "Delete tags, promotion" on 6 April
  • Special:Diff/1016562784 user Ancestralgirl, removing wikilinks and content with the summary "Eliminate promotion to the Roper-Curzon family." on 7 April

At William Compton, 6th Marquess of Northampton:

  • Special:Diff/1016388424 user Castamour, removing wikilinks with the summary "Delete tags, promotion" on 6 April
  • Special:Diff/1016573506 user Thewolfinthesky, removing wikilinks and content with the summary "Eliminate promotion to the Roper-Curzon family." on 7 April

At Whitaker family:

  • Special:Diff/1016386972 user Castamour, removing wikilinks with the summary "Delete tags, promotion" on 6 April
  • Special:Diff/1016565532 user Historymix, removing wikilinks and content with the summary "Eliminate promotion to the Roper-Curzon family." on 7 April

I may have missed a few socks, but I think the links above are very suggestive of a sock farm of some sort. PohranicniStraze ( talk) 00:15, 8 April 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Also found and  Confirmed:
Vintagedice ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)
Alibarzanjilo ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)
Kennet Zim ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)
Diego de Romay ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)
Andyrussx ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)
 Likely:
Historymix ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)
~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 01:47, 9 April 2021 (UTC) reply

24 April 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Per an email request to the functionaries' mailing list, I checked this account against the previously blocked accounts editing Hanna Jaff, which all seem to land under this case. Please see below. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 13:22, 24 April 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

-- Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 13:22, 24 April 2021 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook